IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bas/econst/y2024i2p27-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenges of Bulgaria‘s Fiscal Policy towards Green Transition in the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Iana Paliova

Abstract

The article is dedicated to the challenges of the fiscal policy of Bulgaria in the context of the European Union’s (EU) priorities for a green, climate neutral economy’s transition. The article analyzes the fiscal aspects of the EU Green Deal and related initiatives NextGenerationEU, Fit for 55 package, RePower Plan, Just Transition Mechanism for the EU program period 2021-2027. It examines the objectives of the EU Green Deal’s implementation in the context of the EU Strategy for Financing the Transition to a Sustainable Economy. It studies the mechanisms, tools and alternative approaches in the application of EU funding and modern financial instruments to stimulate the green transformation of the EU economy. The research assesses the opportunities for the green transition in Bulgaria through the application of national and European financial instruments. The study assesses the effects of the fiscal instruments for mitigating and adaptation to climate change on fiscal deficit of Bulgaria. The study shows that the fiscal policy with EU funding and national co-financing for green policies under the National Recovery and Resilience Plan and the Partnership Agreement for 2021-2027 could augment the green transition and have a net positive impact on the fiscal balance. The study also outlines the possible risks and negative impact on budgetary aggregates.

Suggested Citation

  • Iana Paliova, 2024. "Challenges of Bulgaria‘s Fiscal Policy towards Green Transition in the European Union," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 27-49.
    • Handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2024:i:2:p:27-49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iki.bas.bg/Journals/EconomicStudies/2024/2024-2/02_Iana-Paliova.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mr. Simon Black & Ms. Ruo Chen & Ms. Aiko Mineshima & Mr. Victor Mylonas & Ian W.H. Parry & Dinar Prihardini, 2021. "Scaling up Climate Mitigation Policy in Germany," IMF Working Papers 2021/241, International Monetary Fund.
    2. Sebastian Miller & Mauricio Vela, 2013. "Are Environmentally Related Taxes Effective?," Research Department Publications IDB-WP-467, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    3. International Monetary Fund, 2022. "Paraguay: 2022 Article IV Consultation-Press Release; and Staff Report," IMF Staff Country Reports 2022/177, International Monetary Fund.
    4. Antoine Dechezleprêtre & Misato Sato, 2017. "The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Competitiveness," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 11(2), pages 183-206.
    5. International Monetary Fund, 2022. "Oman: 2022 Article IV Consultation-Press Release; and Staff Report," IMF Staff Country Reports 2022/343, International Monetary Fund.
    6. International Monetary Fund, 2022. "Israel: 2022 Article IV Consultation-Press Release and Staff Report," IMF Staff Country Reports 2022/081, International Monetary Fund.
    7. International Monetary Fund, 2022. "Canada: 2022 Article IV Consultation-Press Release; and Staff Report," IMF Staff Country Reports 2022/361, International Monetary Fund.
    8. Eugénie Joltreau & Katrin Sommerfeld, 2019. "Why does emissions trading under the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) not affect firms’ competitiveness? Empirical findings from the literature," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 453-471, April.
    9. Dimitar Zlatinov, 2020. "How Fiscal Policy in Bulgaria may Affect the Transition to a Low Carbon Economy?," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 4, pages 525-535, December.
    10. Sebastian Miller & Mauricio Vela, 2013. "Are Environmentally Related Taxes Effective?," Research Department Publications IDB-WP-467, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    11. International Monetary Fund, 2022. "Austria: 2022 Article IV Consultation-Press Release; Staff Report," IMF Staff Country Reports 2022/284, International Monetary Fund.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Runst, Petrik & Höhle, David, 2022. "The German eco tax and its impact on CO2 emissions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    2. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/6d7es28iae9pjoil7092hs41h3 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Richard M. Bird, 2014. "Global Taxes and International Taxation: Mirage and Reality," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper1429, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    4. Francesco Vona, 2019. "Job losses and political acceptability of climate policies: why the ‘job-killing’ argument is so persistent and how to overturn it," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 524-532, April.
    5. Tipper, Adam & Harkness, Jane, 2018. "Environmental Taxation and Expenditure in New Zealand," Working Paper Series 7627, Victoria University of Wellington, Chair in Public Finance.
    6. Fawzia Mohammed Idris, "undated". "Evaluating an environmental tax as a source of funding for Social Health Insurance: Sudan case," Review of Socio - Economic Perspectives 202194, Reviewsep.
    7. Böning, Justus & Di Nino, Virginia & Folger, Till, 2023. "Benefits and costs of the ETS in the EU, a lesson learned for the CBAM design," Working Paper Series 2764, European Central Bank.
    8. Ionel Bostan & Mihaela Onofrei & Elena-Doina Dascalu & Bogdan Fîrtescu, 2016. "Impact of Sustainable Environmental Expenditures Policy on Air Pollution Reduction, During European Integration Framework," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 18(42), pages 286-286, May.
    9. Svetlana V. Doroshenko & Anna D. Mingaleva, 2020. "Carbon Exchanges: European Experience in Developing the Mechanism of Emission Permit Trading," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 4, pages 52-68, August.
    10. Marian Zaharia & Aurelia Pătrașcu & Manuela Rodica Gogonea & Ana Tănăsescu & Constanța Popescu, 2017. "A Cluster Design on the Influence of Energy Taxation in Shaping the New EU-28 Economic Paradigm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-21, February.
    11. Aliénor Cameron & Marc Baudry, 2023. "The case for carbon leakage and border adjustments: where do economists stand?," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 25(3), pages 435-469, July.
    12. Richard M. Bird, 2018. "Are global taxes feasible?," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 25(5), pages 1372-1400, October.
    13. Beata Zofia Filipiak & Dorota Wyszkowska, 2022. "Determinants of Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in European Union Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-24, December.
    14. Alina Georgiana Manta & Nicoleta Mihaela Florea & Roxana Maria Bădîrcea & Jenica Popescu & Daniel Cîrciumaru & Marius Dalian Doran, 2020. "The Nexus between Carbon Emissions, Energy Use, Economic Growth and Financial Development: Evidence from Central and Eastern European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-21, September.
    15. Zarkovic, Maja, 2020. "Cap-and-trade and produce at least cost? Investigating firm behaviour in the EU ETS," Working papers 2020/12, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    16. Roxana Maria Bădîrcea & Nicoleta Mihaela Florea & Alina Georgiana Manta & Silvia Puiu & Marius Dalian Doran, 2020. "Comparison between Romania and Sweden Based on Three Dimensions: Environmental Performance, Green Taxation and Economic Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, May.
    17. Vandyck, Toon & Weitzel, Matthias & Wojtowicz, Krzysztof & Rey Los Santos, Luis & Maftei, Anamaria & Riscado, Sara, 2021. "Climate policy design, competitiveness and income distribution: A macro-micro assessment for 11 EU countries," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    18. Jaime Vallés-Giménez & Anabel Zárate-Marco, 2020. "A Dynamic Spatial Panel of Subnational GHG Emissions: Environmental Effectiveness of Emissions Taxes in Spanish Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-22, April.
    19. Yemane Wolde-Rufael & Eyob Mulat-weldemeskel, 2023. "Effectiveness of environmental taxes and environmental stringent policies on CO2 emissions: the European experience," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 5211-5239, June.
    20. Nihal Ahmed & Adnan Ahmed Sheikh & Zeeshan Hamid & Piotr Senkus & Ricardo Cosio Borda & Aneta Wysokińska-Senkus & Waldemar Glabiszewski, 2022. "Exploring the Causal Relationship among Green Taxes, Energy Intensity, and Energy Consumption in Nordic Countries: Dumitrescu and Hurlin Causality Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-15, July.
    21. Weiming Lin & Jianling Chen & Jianbang Gan & Yongwu Dai, 2022. "Do Firms That Are Disadvantaged by Unilateral Climate Policy Receive Compensation? Evidence from China’s Energy-Saving Quota Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2024:i:2:p:27-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Diana Dimitrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ikbasbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.