IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eecrev/v178y2025ics0014292125001424.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dark versus light personality types and moral choice

Author

Listed:
  • Dickinson, David L.

Abstract

In this preregistered study, participants were administered validated short-form instruments assessing dark and light personality traits, and they also completed simple building-block tasks relevant to business ethics (e.g., organizational citizenship and counterproductive workplace behaviors). Specifically, participants were administered consequential prosociality and dishonesty decision tasks, as well as the hypothetical moral (Trolley) dilemma task. Overall, the results support the hypotheses that dark, compared to light, personality traits are associated with lower levels of prosociality, higher likelihood of dishonesty, and an increased willingness to make immoral choices. Follow-up data suggest the likely mechanisms connecting personality to (un)ethical choices are at least two-fold: darker personality types are less sensitive to behavioral deviations from a common norm; darker types also have different perceptions of what is others’ ethical norm.

Suggested Citation

  • Dickinson, David L., 2025. "Dark versus light personality types and moral choice," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:178:y:2025:i:c:s0014292125001424
    DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.105092
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014292125001424
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.105092?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:178:y:2025:i:c:s0014292125001424. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eer .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.