IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v137y2019icp133-154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of in-sample forecasting methods

Author

Listed:
  • Bischofberger, Stephan M.
  • Hiabu, Munir
  • Mammen, Enno
  • Nielsen, Jens Perch

Abstract

In-sample forecasting is a recent continuous modification of well-known forecasting methods based on aggregated data. These aggregated methods are known as age-cohort methods in demography, economics, epidemiology and sociology and as chain ladder in non-life insurance. Data is organized in a two-way table with age and cohort as indices, but without measures of exposure. It has recently been established that such structured forecasting methods based on aggregated data can be interpreted as structured histogram estimators. Continuous in-sample forecasting transfers these classical forecasting models into a modern statistical world including smoothing methodology that is more efficient than smoothing via histograms. All in-sample forecasting estimators are collected and their performance is compared via a finite sample simulation study. All methods are extended via multiplicative bias correction. Asymptotic theory is being developed for the histogram-type method of sieves and for the multiplicatively corrected estimators. The multiplicative bias corrected estimators improve all other known in-sample forecasters in the simulation study. The density projection approach seems to have the best performance with forecasting based on survival densities being the runner-up.

Suggested Citation

  • Bischofberger, Stephan M. & Hiabu, Munir & Mammen, Enno & Nielsen, Jens Perch, 2019. "A comparison of in-sample forecasting methods," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 133-154.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:137:y:2019:i:c:p:133-154
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2019.02.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947319300581
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2019.02.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Hiabu & E. Mammen & M. D. Martìnez-Miranda & J. P. Nielsen, 2016. "In-sample forecasting with local linear survival densities," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 103(4), pages 843-859.
    2. Kosei Fukuda, 2006. "Age-period-cohort decomposition of aggregate data: an application to US and Japanese household saving rates," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(7), pages 981-998.
    3. Duraisamy, P., 2002. "Changes in returns to education in India, 1983-94: by gender, age-cohort and location," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 609-622, December.
    4. Mammen, Enno & Martínez Miranda, María Dolores & Nielsen, Jens Perch, 2015. "In-sample forecasting applied to reserving and mesothelioma mortality," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 76-86.
    5. Linton, Oliver & Nielsen, Jens Perch, 1994. "A multiplicative bias reduction method for nonparametric regression," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 181-187, February.
    6. Zoë Fannon & B. Nielsen, 2018. "Age-period cohort models," Economics Papers 2018-W04, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
    7. Jonas Harnau & Bent Nielsen, 2018. "Over-Dispersed Age-Period-Cohort Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 113(524), pages 1722-1732, October.
    8. England, P.D. & Verrall, R.J., 2002. "Stochastic Claims Reserving in General Insurance," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 443-518, August.
    9. Reither, Eric N. & Hauser, Robert M. & Yang, Yang, 2009. "Do birth cohorts matter? Age-period-cohort analyses of the obesity epidemic in the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 1439-1448, November.
    10. Bent Nielsen & María Dolores Martínez-Miranda & Jens Perch Nielsen, 2016. "A simple benchmark for mesothelioma projection for Great Britain," Economics Papers 2016-W03, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
    11. D. Kuang & B. Nielsen & J. P. Nielsen, 2009. "Chain-Ladder as Maximum Likelihood Revisited," Economics Papers 2009-W08, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
    12. Jens Perch Nielsen & Carsten Tanggaard, 2001. "Boundary and Bias Correction in Kernel Hazard Estimation," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 28(4), pages 675-698, December.
    13. Kuang, D. & Nielsen, B. & Nielsen, J. P., 2009. "Chain-Ladder as Maximum Likelihood Revisited," Annals of Actuarial Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 105-121, March.
    14. María Luz Gámiz & Enno Mammen & María Dolores Martínez Miranda & Jens Perch Nielsen, 2016. "Double one-sided cross-validation of local linear hazards," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(4), pages 755-779, September.
    15. Yu-Kang Tu & George Davey Smith & Mark S Gilthorpe, 2011. "A New Approach to Age-Period-Cohort Analysis Using Partial Least Squares Regression: The Trend in Blood Pressure in the Glasgow Alumni Cohort," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(4), pages 1-9, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mammen, Enno & Martínez-Miranda, María Dolores & Nielsen, Jens Perch & Vogt, Michael, 2021. "Calendar effect and in-sample forecasting," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 31-52.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stephan M. Bischofberger, 2020. "In-Sample Hazard Forecasting Based on Survival Models with Operational Time," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Valandis Elpidorou & Carolin Margraf & María Dolores Martínez-Miranda & Bent Nielsen, 2019. "A Likelihood Approach to Bornhuetter–Ferguson Analysis," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-20, December.
    3. M. Hiabu & E. Mammen & M. D. Martìnez-Miranda & J. P. Nielsen, 2016. "In-sample forecasting with local linear survival densities," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 103(4), pages 843-859.
    4. Mammen, Enno & Martínez-Miranda, María Dolores & Nielsen, Jens Perch & Vogt, Michael, 2021. "Calendar effect and in-sample forecasting," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 31-52.
    5. Bent Nielsen, 2014. "Deviance analysis of age-period-cohort models," Economics Papers 2014-W03, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
    6. D. Kuang & B. Nielsen, 2018. "Generalized Log-Normal Chain-Ladder," Papers 1806.05939, arXiv.org.
    7. Liivika Tee & Meelis Käärik & Rauno Viin, 2017. "On Comparison of Stochastic Reserving Methods with Bootstrapping," Risks, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-21, January.
    8. Di Kuang & Bent Nielsen & Jens Perch Nielsen, 2011. "Forecasting in an Extended Chain‐Ladder‐Type Model," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 78(2), pages 345-359, 06.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:137:y:2019:i:c:p:133-154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.