IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v8y2020i1p3-d304744.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In-Sample Hazard Forecasting Based on Survival Models with Operational Time

Author

Listed:
  • Stephan M. Bischofberger

    (Cass Business School, University of London, London EC1Y 8TZ, UK)

Abstract

We introduce a generalization of the one-dimensional accelerated failure time model allowing the covariate effect to be any positive function of the covariate. This function and the baseline hazard rate are estimated nonparametrically via an iterative algorithm. In an application in non-life reserving, the survival time models the settlement delay of a claim and the covariate effect is often called operational time. The accident date of a claim serves as covariate. The estimated hazard rate is a nonparametric continuous-time alternative to chain-ladder development factors in reserving and is used to forecast outstanding liabilities. Hence, we provide an extension of the chain-ladder framework for claim numbers without the assumption of independence between settlement delay and accident date. Our proposed algorithm is an unsupervised learning approach to reserving that detects operational time in the data and adjusts for it in the estimation process. Advantages of the new estimation method are illustrated in a data set consisting of paid claims from a motor insurance business line on which we forecast the number of outstanding claims.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephan M. Bischofberger, 2020. "In-Sample Hazard Forecasting Based on Survival Models with Operational Time," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:8:y:2020:i:1:p:3-:d:304744
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/8/1/3/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/8/1/3/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Hiabu & E. Mammen & M. D. Martìnez-Miranda & J. P. Nielsen, 2016. "In-sample forecasting with local linear survival densities," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 103(4), pages 843-859.
    2. Crevecoeur, Jonas & Antonio, Katrien & Verbelen, Roel, 2019. "Modeling the number of hidden events subject to observation delay," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 930-944.
    3. Larsen, Christian Roholte, 2007. "An Individual Claims Reserving Model," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 37(1), pages 113-132, May.
    4. Maximilien Baudry & Christian Y. Robert, 2019. "A machine learning approach for individual claims reserving in insurance," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(5), pages 1127-1155, September.
    5. Taylor, G. C., 1981. "Speed of Finalization of Claims and Claims Runoff Analysis," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(2), pages 81-100, December.
    6. Badescu, Andrei L. & Lin, X. Sheldon & Tang, Dameng, 2016. "A marked Cox model for the number of IBNR claims: Theory," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 29-37.
    7. Taylor, Greg & McGuire, Gráinne & Sullivan, James, 2008. "Individual Claim Loss Reserving Conditioned by Case Estimates," Annals of Actuarial Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(1-2), pages 215-256, September.
    8. Mack, Thomas, 1993. "Distribution-free Calculation of the Standard Error of Chain Ladder Reserve Estimates," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(2), pages 213-225, November.
    9. Jewell, William S., 1990. "Predicting IBNYR Events and Delays II. Discrete Time," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 93-111, April.
    10. Zhao, Xiao Bing & Zhou, Xian & Wang, Jing Long, 2009. "Semiparametric model for prediction of individual claim loss reserving," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 1-8, August.
    11. Kevin Kuo, 2018. "DeepTriangle: A Deep Learning Approach to Loss Reserving," Papers 1804.09253, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2019.
    12. England, P.D. & Verrall, R.J., 2002. "Stochastic Claims Reserving in General Insurance," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 443-518, August.
    13. Zhao, XiaoBing & Zhou, Xian, 2010. "Applying copula models to individual claim loss reserving methods," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 290-299, April.
    14. Renshaw, A.E. & Verrall, R.J., 1998. "A Stochastic Model Underlying the Chain-Ladder Technique," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(4), pages 903-923, October.
    15. D. Kuang & B. Nielsen & J. P. Nielsen, 2009. "Chain-Ladder as Maximum Likelihood Revisited," Economics Papers 2009-W08, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
    16. Jewell, William S., 1989. "Predicting Ibnyr Events and Delays: I. Continuous Time," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 25-55, April.
    17. Taylor, G. C., 1982. "Zehnwirth's comments on the see-saw method: a reply," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(2), pages 105-108, April.
    18. Jens Perch Nielsen & Carsten Tanggaard, 2001. "Boundary and Bias Correction in Kernel Hazard Estimation," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 28(4), pages 675-698, December.
    19. Linton, Oliver & Mammen, Enno & Nielsen, Jens Perch & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2011. "Nonparametric regression with filtered data," LIDAM Reprints ISBA 2011008, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    20. Huang, Jinlong & Qiu, Chunjuan & Wu, Xianyi & Zhou, Xian, 2015. "An individual loss reserving model with independent reporting and settlement," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 232-245.
    21. Austin, Matthew D. & Betensky, Rebecca A., 2014. "Eliminating bias due to censoring in Kendall’s tau estimators for quasi-independence of truncation and failure," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 16-26.
    22. Martin, Emily C. & Betensky, Rebecca A., 2005. "Testing Quasi-Independence of Failure and Truncation Times via Conditional Kendall's Tau," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 100, pages 484-492, June.
    23. Kevin Kuo, 2019. "DeepTriangle: A Deep Learning Approach to Loss Reserving," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-12, September.
    24. Kuang, D. & Nielsen, B. & Nielsen, J. P., 2009. "Chain-Ladder as Maximum Likelihood Revisited," Annals of Actuarial Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 105-121, March.
    25. Norberg, Ragnar, 1993. "Prediction of Outstanding Liabilities in Non-Life Insurance1," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(1), pages 95-115, May.
    26. Greg Taylor, 2019. "Loss Reserving Models: Granular and Machine Learning Forms," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-18, July.
    27. Avanzi, Benjamin & Wong, Bernard & Yang, Xinda, 2016. "A micro-level claim count model with overdispersion and reporting delays," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1-14.
    28. Mario V. Wüthrich, 2018. "Machine learning in individual claims reserving," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2018(6), pages 465-480, July.
    29. Norberg, Ragnar, 1999. "Prediction of Outstanding Liabilities II. Model Variations and Extensions," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(1), pages 5-25, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vali Asimit & Ioannis Kyriakou & Jens Perch Nielsen, 2020. "Special Issue “Machine Learning in Insurance”," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-2, May.
    2. Mammen, Enno & Martínez-Miranda, María Dolores & Nielsen, Jens Perch & Vogt, Michael, 2021. "Calendar effect and in-sample forecasting," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 31-52.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maciak, Matúš & Okhrin, Ostap & Pešta, Michal, 2021. "Infinitely stochastic micro reserving," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 30-58.
    2. Francis Duval & Mathieu Pigeon, 2019. "Individual Loss Reserving Using a Gradient Boosting-Based Approach," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Mat'uv{s} Maciak & Ostap Okhrin & Michal Pev{s}ta, 2019. "Infinitely Stochastic Micro Forecasting," Papers 1908.10636, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2019.
    4. Mat'uv{s} Maciak & Ostap Okhrin & Michal Pev{s}ta, 2018. "Dynamic and granular loss reserving with copulae," Papers 1801.01792, arXiv.org.
    5. Łukasz Delong & Mario V. Wüthrich, 2020. "Neural Networks for the Joint Development of Individual Payments and Claim Incurred," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-34, April.
    6. Benjamin Avanzi & Gregory Clive Taylor & Bernard Wong & Xinda Yang, 2020. "On the modelling of multivariate counts with Cox processes and dependent shot noise intensities," Papers 2004.11169, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2020.
    7. Badescu, Andrei L. & Lin, X. Sheldon & Tang, Dameng, 2016. "A marked Cox model for the number of IBNR claims: Theory," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 29-37.
    8. Avanzi, Benjamin & Wong, Bernard & Yang, Xinda, 2016. "A micro-level claim count model with overdispersion and reporting delays," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1-14.
    9. Avanzi, Benjamin & Taylor, Greg & Wong, Bernard & Yang, Xinda, 2021. "On the modelling of multivariate counts with Cox processes and dependent shot noise intensities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 9-24.
    10. Crevecoeur, Jonas & Antonio, Katrien & Verbelen, Roel, 2019. "Modeling the number of hidden events subject to observation delay," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 930-944.
    11. Liivika Tee & Meelis Käärik & Rauno Viin, 2017. "On Comparison of Stochastic Reserving Methods with Bootstrapping," Risks, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-21, January.
    12. Richard J. Verrall & Mario V. Wüthrich, 2016. "Understanding Reporting Delay in General Insurance," Risks, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-36, July.
    13. Yanez, Juan Sebastian & Pigeon, Mathieu, 2021. "Micro-level parametric duration-frequency-severity modeling for outstanding claim payments," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 106-119.
    14. Fersini, Paola & Melisi, Giuseppe, 2016. "Stochastic model to evaluate the fair value of motor third-party liability under the direct reimbursement scheme and quantification of the capital requirement in a Solvency II perspective," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 27-44.
    15. Valandis Elpidorou & Carolin Margraf & María Dolores Martínez-Miranda & Bent Nielsen, 2019. "A Likelihood Approach to Bornhuetter–Ferguson Analysis," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-20, December.
    16. Ihsan Chaoubi & Camille Besse & H'el`ene Cossette & Marie-Pier C^ot'e, 2022. "Micro-level Reserving for General Insurance Claims using a Long Short-Term Memory Network," Papers 2201.13267, arXiv.org.
    17. Bischofberger, Stephan M. & Hiabu, Munir & Mammen, Enno & Nielsen, Jens Perch, 2019. "A comparison of in-sample forecasting methods," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 133-154.
    18. Arthur Charpentier & Mathieu Pigeon, 2016. "Macro vs. Micro Methods in Non-Life Claims Reserving (an Econometric Perspective)," Risks, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-18, May.
    19. Huang, Jinlong & Qiu, Chunjuan & Wu, Xianyi & Zhou, Xian, 2015. "An individual loss reserving model with independent reporting and settlement," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 232-245.
    20. M. Hiabu & E. Mammen & M. D. Martìnez-Miranda & J. P. Nielsen, 2016. "In-sample forecasting with local linear survival densities," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 103(4), pages 843-859.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:8:y:2020:i:1:p:3-:d:304744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.