IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/insuma/v101y2021ipbp572-586.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dispersion modelling of outstanding claims with double Poisson regression models

Author

Listed:
  • Gao, Guangyuan
  • Meng, Shengwang
  • Shi, Yanlin

Abstract

Over-dispersed Poisson chain-ladder models are widely used in general insurance claims reserving. Although such models can accommodate the over-dispersion frequently observed in run-off triangles, they also impose an additional constraint of fixed variance to mean ratio across cells. In this paper, we relax this constraint and develop a flexible dispersion structure in a double Poisson chain-ladder model. The proposed model nests the classic over-dispersed Poisson model as a special case. A generalized likelihood ratio test is further proposed to compare different dispersion structures. In contrast to the existing claims reserving methods, our proposed method is more flexible in terms of the dispersion modelling. Simulation and empirical studies are conducted to demonstrate the importance of flexible dispersion modelling.

Suggested Citation

  • Gao, Guangyuan & Meng, Shengwang & Shi, Yanlin, 2021. "Dispersion modelling of outstanding claims with double Poisson regression models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 572-586.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:101:y:2021:i:pb:p:572-586
    DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2021.10.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167668721001487
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2021.10.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tzougas, George & Karlis, Dimitris, 2020. "An Em Algorithm For Fitting A New Class Of Mixed Exponential Regression Models With Varying Dispersion," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 50(2), pages 555-583, May.
    2. Andrea Gabrielli & Mario V. Wüthrich, 2018. "An Individual Claims History Simulation Machine," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-32, March.
    3. England, P. D. & Verrall, R. J., 2006. "Predictive Distributions of Outstanding Liabilities in General Insurance," Annals of Actuarial Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(2), pages 221-270, September.
    4. Mack, Thomas, 1993. "Distribution-free Calculation of the Standard Error of Chain Ladder Reserve Estimates," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(2), pages 213-225, November.
    5. Mario V. Wuthrich & Michael Merz, 2015. "Stochastic Claims Reserving Manual: Advances in Dynamic Modeling," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 15-34, Swiss Finance Institute.
    6. Gisler, Alois, 2019. "The Reserve Uncertainties In The Chain Ladder Model Of Mack Revisited," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(3), pages 787-821, September.
    7. Michael Merz & Mario V. Wuthrich, 2014. "Claims Run-Off Uncertainty: The Full Picture," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 14-69, Swiss Finance Institute.
    8. Gabrielli, Andrea, 2020. "A Neural Network Boosted Double Overdispersed Poisson Claims Reserving Model," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 50(1), pages 25-60, January.
    9. George Tzougas & Himchan Jeong, 2021. "An Expectation-Maximization Algorithm for the Exponential-Generalized Inverse Gaussian Regression Model with Varying Dispersion and Shape for Modelling the Aggregate Claim Amount," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, January.
    10. Zoë Fannon & B. Nielsen, 2018. "Age-period cohort models," Economics Papers 2018-W04, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
    11. Jonas Harnau & Bent Nielsen, 2018. "Over-Dispersed Age-Period-Cohort Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 113(524), pages 1722-1732, October.
    12. England, P.D. & Verrall, R.J., 2002. "Stochastic Claims Reserving in General Insurance," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 443-518, August.
    13. Renshaw, A.E. & Verrall, R.J., 1998. "A Stochastic Model Underlying the Chain-Ladder Technique," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(4), pages 903-923, October.
    14. Tzougas, George & Jeong, Himchan, 2021. "An expectation-maximization algorithm for the exponential-generalized inverse Gaussian regression model with varying dispersion and shape for modelling the aggregate claim amount," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108210, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Tzougas, George & Karlis, Dimitris, 2020. "An EM algorithm for fitting a new class of mixed exponential regression models with varying dispersion," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 104027, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Peters, Gareth W. & Targino, Rodrigo S. & Wüthrich, Mario V., 2017. "Full Bayesian analysis of claims reserving uncertainty," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 41-53.
    17. Taylor, G. C. & Ashe, F. R., 1983. "Second moments of estimates of outstanding claims," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 37-61, September.
    18. Lindholm, Mathias & Lindskog, Filip & Wahl, Felix, 2020. "Estimation of conditional mean squared error of prediction for claims reserving," Annals of Actuarial Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(1), pages 93-128, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. England, P.D. & Verrall, R.J. & Wüthrich, M.V., 2019. "On the lifetime and one-year views of reserve risk, with application to IFRS 17 and Solvency II risk margins," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 74-88.
    2. Eduardo Ramos-P'erez & Pablo J. Alonso-Gonz'alez & Jos'e Javier N'u~nez-Vel'azquez, 2020. "Stochastic reserving with a stacked model based on a hybridized Artificial Neural Network," Papers 2008.07564, arXiv.org.
    3. Steinmetz, Julia & Jentsch, Carsten, 2022. "Asymptotic theory for Mack's model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 223-268.
    4. Verdonck, T. & Debruyne, M., 2011. "The influence of individual claims on the chain-ladder estimates: Analysis and diagnostic tool," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 85-98, January.
    5. Valandis Elpidorou & Carolin Margraf & María Dolores Martínez-Miranda & Bent Nielsen, 2019. "A Likelihood Approach to Bornhuetter–Ferguson Analysis," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Nils Engler & Filip Lindskog, 2023. "Mack's estimator motivated by large exposure asymptotics in a compound Poisson setting," Papers 2310.12056, arXiv.org.
    7. Gian Paolo Clemente & Nino Savelli & Diego Zappa, 2019. "Modelling Outstanding Claims with Mixed Compound Processes in Insurance," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(3), pages 123-138, March.
    8. Peters, Gareth W. & Targino, Rodrigo S. & Wüthrich, Mario V., 2017. "Full Bayesian analysis of claims reserving uncertainty," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 41-53.
    9. Lindholm, Mathias & Verrall, Richard, 2020. "Regression based reserving models and partial information," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 109-124.
    10. Verrall, R.J. & England, P.D., 2005. "Incorporating expert opinion into a stochastic model for the chain-ladder technique," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 355-370, October.
    11. Alessandro Ricotta & Edoardo Luini, 2019. "Bayesian Estimation of Structure Variables in the Collective Risk Model for Reserve Risk," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 9(2), pages 1-2.
    12. Eduardo Ramos-P'erez & Pablo J. Alonso-Gonz'alez & Jos'e Javier N'u~nez-Vel'azquez, 2022. "Mack-Net model: Blending Mack's model with Recurrent Neural Networks," Papers 2205.07334, arXiv.org.
    13. Pešta, Michal & Hudecová, Šárka, 2012. "Asymptotic consistency and inconsistency of the chain ladder," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 472-479.
    14. Crevecoeur, Jonas & Antonio, Katrien & Verbelen, Roel, 2019. "Modeling the number of hidden events subject to observation delay," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 930-944.
    15. Pitselis, Georgios & Grigoriadou, Vasiliki & Badounas, Ioannis, 2015. "Robust loss reserving in a log-linear model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 14-27.
    16. Bischofberger, Stephan M. & Hiabu, Munir & Mammen, Enno & Nielsen, Jens Perch, 2019. "A comparison of in-sample forecasting methods," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 133-154.
    17. Benjamin Avanzi & Yanfeng Li & Bernard Wong & Alan Xian, 2022. "Ensemble distributional forecasting for insurance loss reserving," Papers 2206.08541, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    18. Liivika Tee & Meelis Käärik & Rauno Viin, 2017. "On Comparison of Stochastic Reserving Methods with Bootstrapping," Risks, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-21, January.
    19. Stefano Cavastracci Strascia & Agostino Tripodi, 2018. "Overdispersed-Poisson Model in Claims Reserving: Closed Tool for One-Year Volatility in GLM Framework," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-24, December.
    20. Portugal, Luís & Pantelous, Athanasios A. & Verrall, Richard, 2021. "Univariate and multivariate claims reserving with Generalized Link Ratios," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 57-67.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Incurred but not reported (IBNR) claims; Double Poisson distribution; Approximate restricted or residual maximum likelihood (approximate REML); Chain-ladder technique; Over-dispersed Poisson model; Prediction error;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C18 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Methodolical Issues: General
    • G22 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:101:y:2021:i:pb:p:572-586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505554 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.