IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/not/notcfc/2020-02.html

Switching-track after the Great Recession

Author

Listed:
  • Francesca Vinci
  • Omar Licandro

Abstract

Data suggests that the level of GDP shifted to a permanently lower trend following the Great Recession for most advanced countries, and researchers have not yet reached a consensus concerning the drivers of this phenomenon. We contribute to this literature by suggesting a DSGE model with financial frictions and endogenous growth through learning-by-doing. With an aggregate AK technology, a negative shock to the capital stock has the effect of moving the economy to a lower trend. A Taylor rule policy designed to reduce the output gap may counterbalance the shock, bringing the economy back to the past trend. However, when the recession is deep and persistent and the ZLB binds, a revision of potential output measures may weaken the recovering role of monetary policy, making the economy converge to a lower trend. We calibrate the model to the U.S. economy and find that GDP can fully recover from a textbook TFP shock under a standard Taylor rule, whilst large demand shocks can affect the supply side permanently. Our framework is thus consistent with episodes of economic recovery as well as episodes of no-recovery. Results rely on the observation that the measurement of U.S. potential output switched track as the Great Recession unfolded, because the severe and prolonged slump put downward pressure on estimates. As a consequence, the output gap closed following the switching-track of potential output, rather than faster GDP growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesca Vinci & Omar Licandro, 2020. "Switching-track after the Great Recession," Discussion Papers 2020/02, University of Nottingham, Centre for Finance, Credit and Macroeconomics (CFCM).
  • Handle: RePEc:not:notcfc:2020/02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/cfcm/documents/papers/2020/cfcm2020-02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Beqiraj, Elton & Cao, Qingqing & Minetti, Raoul & Tarquini, Giulio, 2025. "Persistent slumps: Innovation and the credit channel of monetary policy," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    2. Fornaro, Luca & Wolf, Martin, 2023. "The scars of supply shocks: Implications for monetary policy," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(S), pages 18-36.
    3. Valerie Cerra & Antonio Fatás & Sweta C. Saxena, 2023. "Hysteresis and Business Cycles," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 61(1), pages 181-225, March.
    4. repec:rim:rimwps:21-22 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Cristiana Benedetti-Fasil & Giammario Impullitti & Omar Licandro & Petr Sedlacek, 2021. "Heterogeneous Firms, R&D Policies and the Long Shadow of Business Cycles," JRC Working Papers on Territorial Modelling and Analysis 2021-04, Joint Research Centre.
    6. Fatás, Antonio & Singh, Sanjay R., 2024. "Supply or demand? Policy makers’ confusion in the presence of hysteresis," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    7. Omar Licandro & Francesca Vinci, 2021. "Potential output, the Taylor Rule and the Fed," Discussion Papers 2021/03, University of Nottingham, Centre for Finance, Credit and Macroeconomics (CFCM).
    8. León-Ledesma, Miguel & Shibayama, Katsuyuki, 2023. "(Endogenous) Growth Slowdowns," CEPR Discussion Papers 18506, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    9. Bianca Barbaro & Giorgio Massari & Patrizio Tirelli, 2022. "Who killed business dynamism in the U.S.?," Working Papers 494, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised Aug 2022.
    10. Fabrice Collard & Omar Licandro, 2025. "The Neoclassical Model and the Welfare Costs of Selection"," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 57, July.
    11. Matteo Cacciatore & Dmitry Matveev & Rodrigo Sekkel, 2022. "Uncertainty and Monetary Policy Experimentation: Empirical Challenges and Insights from Academic Literature," Discussion Papers 2022-9, Bank of Canada.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • E12 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General Aggregative Models - - - Keynes; Keynesian; Post-Keynesian; Modern Monetary Theory
    • E22 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Investment; Capital; Intangible Capital; Capacity
    • E32 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles - - - Business Fluctuations; Cycles
    • O41 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - One, Two, and Multisector Growth Models
    • E52 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit - - - Monetary Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:not:notcfc:2020/02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Hilary Hughes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cfnotuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.