Democracy Undone. Systematic Minority Advantage in Competitive Vote Markets
We study the competitive equilibrium of a market for votes where voters can trade votes for a numeraire before making a decision via majority rule. The choice is binary and the number of supporters of either alternative is known. We identify a sufficient condition guaranteeing the existence of an ex ante equilibrium. In equilibrium, only the most intense voter on each side demands votes and each demand enough votes to alone control a majority. The probability of a minority victory is independent of the size of the minority and converges to one half, for any minority size, when the electorate is arbitrarily large. In a large electorate, the numerical advantage of the majority becomes irrelevant: democracy is undone by the market.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
|Date of creation:||Dec 2012|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Centre for Economic Policy Research, 77 Bastwick Street, London EC1V 3PZ.|
Phone: 44 - 20 - 7183 8801
Fax: 44 - 20 - 7183 8820
|Order Information:|| Email: |
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Beth Allen & James S. Jordan, 1998. "The existence of rational expectations equilibrium: a retrospective," Staff Report 252, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
- Alessandra Casella & Aniol Llorente-Saguer & Thomas R. Palfrey, 2012.
"Competitive Equilibrium in Markets for Votes,"
Journal of Political Economy,
University of Chicago Press, vol. 120(4), pages 593 - 658.
- Alessandra Casella & Aniol Llorente-Saguer & Thomas R. Palfrey, 2010. "Competitive Equilibrium in Markets for Votes," NBER Working Papers 16315, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Alessandra Casella & Aniol Llorente-Saguer & Thomas R. Palfrey, 2012. "Competitive Equilibrium in Markets for Votes," Working Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2012_03, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
- Alessandra Casella & Aniol Llorente-Saguer & Thomas R. Palfrey, 2010. "Competitive Equilibrium in Markets for Votes," Levine's Working Paper Archive 661465000000000143, David K. Levine.
- Casella, Alessandra & Llorente-Saguer, Aniol & Palfrey, Thomas R, 2010. "Competitive equilibrium in Markets for Votes," CEPR Discussion Papers 7992, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Dirk Engelmann & Veronika Grimm, 2012.
"Mechanisms for Efficient Voting with Private Information about Preferences,"
Royal Economic Society, vol. 122(563), pages 1010-1041, 09.
- Engelmann, Dirk & Grimm, Veronika, 2008. "Mechanisms for efficient voting with private information about preferences," FAU Discussion Papers in Economics 03/2008, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Institute for Economics.
- Jackson, Matthew O. & Dekel, Eddie & Wolinsky, Asher, 2005.
1215, California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences.
- Klaus Kultti & Hannu Salonen, 2005. "Market for Votes," Homo Oeconomicus, Institute of SocioEconomics, vol. 23, pages 323-332.
- Tobin, James, 1970. "On Limiting the Domain of Inequality," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 13(2), pages 263-77, October.
- Tullock, Gordon, 1970. "A Simple Algebraic Logrolling Model," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 60(3), pages 419-26, June.
- Bernholz, Peter, 1974. "Logrolling, Arrow-Paradox and Decision Rules-A Generalization," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 49-62.
- Haefele, Edwin T, 1971. "A Utility Theory of Representative Government," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 61(3), pages 350-67, June.
- Ilyana Kuziemko & Eric Werker, 2006. "How Much Is a Seat on the Security Council Worth? Foreign Aid and Bribery at the United Nations," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 114(5), pages 905-930, October.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:9242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.