IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pbo459.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Iwan Bos

Personal Details

First Name:Iwan
Middle Name:
Last Name:Bos
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pbo459
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]
https://sites.google.com/view/iwanbos

Affiliation

(50%) Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE)
School of Business and Economics
Maastricht University

Maastricht, Netherlands
http://www.maastrichtuniversity.nl/SBE
RePEc:edi:meteonl (more details at EDIRC)

(50%) Vakgroep Organisatie en Strategie
School of Business and Economics
Maastricht University

Maastricht, Netherlands
http://www.maastrichtuniversity.nl/web/Faculties/SBE/Theme/Departments/OrganizationAndStrategy.htm
RePEc:edi:domaanl (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Bos, Iwan, 2021. "A Theory of “Too Big To Jail”," Research Memorandum 007, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
  2. Bos, Iwan & Marini, Marco A. & Saulle, Riccardo D., 2021. "Myopic Oligopoly Pricing," FEEM Working Papers 310282, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
  3. Bos, Iwan & Marini, Marco A., 2020. "Collusion in Quality-Segmented Markets," 2030 Agenda 307986, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
  4. Bos, Iwan & Marini, Marco A. & Saulle, Riccardo, 2019. "Cartel Formation with Quality Differentiation," MPRA Paper 97820, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  5. Bos, Iwan, 2019. "Competition Policy within the Coordinated and Hierarchical Market Tradition: The Case of Germany and France," Research Memorandum 018, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
  6. Bos, Iwan & Vermeulen, Dries, 2019. "On the Microfoundation of Linear Oligopoly Demand," Research Memorandum 004, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
  7. Bos, Iwan & Peeters, Ronald, 2019. "Price Competition in a Vertizontally Differentiated Duopoly," Research Memorandum 017, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
  8. Bos, Iwan, 2019. "U.S. Competition Policy and the Free Market Philosophy: A Moral Justification," Research Memorandum 003, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
  9. Bos, Iwan & Marini, Marco A., 2018. "Cartel Stability under Quality Differentiation," MPRA Paper 88335, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  10. Bos, I. & Vermeulen, A.J., 2015. "On pure-strategy Nash equilibria in price-quantity games," Research Memorandum 018, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
  11. Iwan Bos & Stephen Davies & Peter L. Ormosi, 2014. "The deterrent effect of anti-cartel enforcement: A tale of two tails," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Competition Policy (CCP) 2014-06v2, Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
  12. Bos, A.M. & Letterie, W.A. & Vermeulen, A.J., 2013. "Antitrust as facilitating factor for collusion," Research Memorandum 011, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
  13. Bos, A.M. & Harrington Jr., J.E., 2013. "Competition policy and cartel size," Research Memorandum 027, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
  14. van den Berg, A.H.J. & Bos, A.M., 2011. "Collusion in a price-quantity oligopoly," Research Memorandum 039, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
  15. Bos, A.M. & Wandschneider, F., 2011. "Cartel ringleaders and the corporate leniency program," Research Memorandum 038, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
  16. Bos, I. & Pot, E.A. & Peeters, R.J.A.P., 2010. "Competition versus collusion: the impact of consumer inertia," Research Memorandum 024, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
  17. Bos, A.M. & Pot, E.A., 2010. "Welfare-enhancing hard core cartels," Research Memorandum 004, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
  18. Bos, I. & Pot, E.A. & Peeters, R.J.A.P., 2010. "Do antitrust agencies facilitate meetings in smoke-filled rooms?," Research Memorandum 030, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
  19. Iwan Bos & Maarten Pieter Schinkel, 2009. "Tracing the Base: A Topographic Test for Collusive Basing-Point Pricing," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 09-007/1, Tinbergen Institute.
  20. Iwan Bos & Joseph E. Harrington, Jr., 2008. "Endogenous Cartel Formation with Heterogeneous Firms," Economics Working Paper Archive 544, The Johns Hopkins University,Department of Economics, revised Nov 2008.

Articles

  1. Iwan Bos, 2022. "A Buyer-Based Measure of Seller Concentration," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(14), pages 1-6, July.
  2. Bos Iwan & Vermeulen Dries, 2022. "On the Microfoundation of Linear Oligopoly Demand," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 22(1), pages 1-15, January.
  3. Iwan Bos & Marco A. Marini, 2022. "Collusion in quality‐segmented markets," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 24(2), pages 293-323, April.
  4. Bos, Iwan & Vermeulen, Dries, 2021. "On pure-strategy Nash equilibria in price–quantity games," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
  5. Bos, Iwan & Vermeulen, Dries, 2021. "Equilibrium existence with spillover demand," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
  6. Bos Iwan, 2021. "A Theory of ‘Too Big To Jail’," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(3), pages 569-582, November.
  7. Bos, Iwan & Marini, Marco A. & Saulle, Riccardo D., 2020. "Cartel formation with quality differentiation," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 36-50.
  8. Bos, Iwan & Marini, Marco A., 2019. "Cartel stability under quality differentiation," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 70-73.
  9. Iwan Bos & Wilko Letterie & Nina Scherl, 2019. "Industry Impact Of Cartels: Evidence From The Stock Market1," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 15(2-3), pages 358-379.
  10. Bos, Iwan & Davies, Stephen & Harrington, Joseph E. & Ormosi, Peter L., 2018. "Does enforcement deter cartels? A tale of two tails," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 372-405.
  11. van den Berg, Anita & Bos, Iwan, 2017. "Collusion in a price-quantity oligopoly," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 159-185.
  12. Iwan Bos & Ronald Peeters & Erik Pot, 2017. "Competition versus collusion: The impact of consumer inertia," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 13(4), pages 387-400, December.
  13. Bos Iwan & Letterie Wilko & Vermeulen Dries, 2015. "Antitrust as Facilitating Factor for Collusion," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 15(2), pages 797-814, April.
  14. Iwan Bos & Joseph E. Harrington, 2015. "Competition Policy And Cartel Size," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 56(1), pages 133-153, February.
  15. Iwan Bos & Frederick Wandschneider, 2013. "A note on cartel ringleaders and the corporate leniency programme," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(11), pages 1100-1103, July.
  16. Iwan Bos & Ronald Peeters & Erik Pot, 2013. "Do antitrust agencies facilitate meetings in smoke-filled rooms?," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(6), pages 611-614, April.
  17. van den Berg, Anita & Bos, Iwan & Herings, P. Jean-Jacques & Peters, Hans, 2012. "Dynamic Cournot duopoly with intertemporal capacity constraints," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 174-192.
  18. Iwan Bos & Erik Pot, 2012. "On the possibility of welfare-enhancing hard core cartels," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 107(3), pages 199-216, November.
  19. Iwan Bos & Joseph E. Harrington, Jr, 2010. "Endogenous cartel formation with heterogeneous firms," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 41(1), pages 92-117, March.
  20. Iwan Bos & Maarten Pieter Schinkel, 2006. "On The Scope For The European Commission'S 2006 Fining Guidelines Underthe Legal Maximum Fine," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 2(4), pages 673-682.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Bos, Iwan & Marini, Marco A. & Saulle, Riccardo D., 2021. "Myopic Oligopoly Pricing," FEEM Working Papers 310282, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).

    Cited by:

    1. Edwards, Robert A. & Routledge, Robert R., 2022. "Information, Bertrand–Edgeworth competition and the law of one price," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).

  2. Bos, Iwan & Marini, Marco A. & Saulle, Riccardo, 2019. "Cartel Formation with Quality Differentiation," MPRA Paper 97820, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. Iwan Bos & Marco A. Marini, 2020. "Collusion in Quality-Segmented Markets," Working Papers 22/20, Sapienza University of Rome, DISS.
    2. Federico Innocenti & Domenico Menicucci, 2021. "Partial Compatibility in Oligopoly," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2021_278, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    3. Martin, Simon & Schmal, W. Benedikt, 2021. "Collusive compensation schemes aided by algorithms," DICE Discussion Papers 375, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).

  3. Bos, Iwan & Vermeulen, Dries, 2019. "On the Microfoundation of Linear Oligopoly Demand," Research Memorandum 004, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).

    Cited by:

    1. Soeiro, Renato & Adrego Pinto, Alberto, 2019. "Social power as a solution to the Bertrand Paradox," MPRA Paper 94271, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Choné, Philippe & Linnemer, Laurent, 2020. "Linear demand systems for differentiated goods: Overview and user’s guide," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).

  4. Bos, Iwan & Marini, Marco A., 2018. "Cartel Stability under Quality Differentiation," MPRA Paper 88335, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. Iwan Bos & Marco A. Marini, 2020. "Collusion in Quality-Segmented Markets," Working Papers 22/20, Sapienza University of Rome, DISS.
    2. Federico Innocenti & Domenico Menicucci, 2021. "Partial Compatibility in Oligopoly," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2021_278, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    3. Bos, Iwan & Marini, Marco A. & Saulle, Riccardo, 2019. "Cartel Formation with Quality Differentiation," MPRA Paper 97820, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Thanos Athanasopoulos & Burak Dindaroglu & Georgios Petropoulos, 2021. "Stability of collusion and quality differentiation- a Nash bargaining approach," Working Papers 43226, Bruegel.

  5. Bos, I. & Vermeulen, A.J., 2015. "On pure-strategy Nash equilibria in price-quantity games," Research Memorandum 018, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).

    Cited by:

    1. Bos, Iwan & Vermeulen, Dries, 2021. "Equilibrium existence with spillover demand," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    2. Tasnádi, Attila, 2020. "Production in advance versus production to order: Equilibrium and social surplus," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 11-18.
    3. Mongoljin Batsaikhan & Norovsambuu Tumennasan, 2018. "Output Decisions and Price Matching: Theory and Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(8), pages 3609-3624, August.
    4. Edwards, Robert A. & Routledge, Robert R., 2022. "Information, Bertrand–Edgeworth competition and the law of one price," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).

  6. Bos, A.M. & Letterie, W.A. & Vermeulen, A.J., 2013. "Antitrust as facilitating factor for collusion," Research Memorandum 011, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).

    Cited by:

    1. Chowdhury, Subhasish M. & Crede, Carsten J., 2020. "Post-cartel tacit collusion: Determinants, consequences, and prevention," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    2. Jochem, Annabelle & Parrotta, Pierpaolo & Valletta, Giacomo, 2020. "The impact of the 2002 reform of the EU leniency program on cartel outcomes," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    3. Carsten J. Crede & Liang Lu, 2016. "The effects of endogenous enforcement on strategic uncertainty and cartel deterrence," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS) 16-08, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    4. Annabelle Jochem & Pierpaolo Parrotta & Giacomo Valletta, 2020. "The impact of the 2002 reform of the EU leniency program on cartel outcomes," Post-Print hal-03131313, HAL.
    5. Moritz Birgit & Becker Martin & Schmidtchen Dieter, 2018. "Measuring the Deterrent Effect of European Cartel Law Enforcement," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 18(3), pages 1-27, July.

  7. van den Berg, A.H.J. & Bos, A.M., 2011. "Collusion in a price-quantity oligopoly," Research Memorandum 039, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Cited by:

    1. Christian Ewerhart, 2022. "Diagonal payoff security and equilibrium existence in quasi-symmetric discontinuous games," ECON - Working Papers 414, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Aug 2022.
    2. Quan-tao Zhu & Xin-wang Wu & Laixiang Sun, 2014. "A generalized framework for endogenous timing in duopoly games and an application to price-quantity competition," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 112(2), pages 137-164, June.
    3. Jóna, György, 2020. "Versengő együttműködés versus összejátszás, avagy hálózati szintű csalás? [Coopetition versus collusion, or fraud at network level?]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 164-180.
    4. Wu, Jiang & Zou, Liuxin & Gong, Yeming & Chen, Mingyang, 2021. "The anti-collusion dilemma: Information sharing of the supply chain under buyback contracts," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    5. Bos, I. & Vermeulen, A.J., 2015. "On pure-strategy Nash equilibria in price-quantity games," Research Memorandum 018, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    6. Tasnádi, Attila, 2020. "Production in advance versus production to order: Equilibrium and social surplus," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 11-18.

  8. Bos, A.M. & Wandschneider, F., 2011. "Cartel ringleaders and the corporate leniency program," Research Memorandum 038, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Cited by:

    1. Pavlova, Natalia & Shastitko, Andrey, 2014. "Effects of Hostility Tradition in Antitrust: Leniency Programs and Cooperation Agreements," EconStor Preprints 122051, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    2. Benjamin Radoc & Philip Amadeus Libre & Shanti Aubren Prado, 2020. "Incentive to squeal: an experiment on leniency programs for antitrust violators," Department of Economics, Ateneo de Manila University, Working Paper Series 202003, Department of Economics, Ateneo de Manila University.
    3. Rau, Holger & Clemens, Georg, 2014. "Do Leniency Policies facilitate Collusion? Experimental Evidence," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100509, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    4. Pavlova, Natalia & Shastitko, Andrey, 2016. "Leniency programs and socially beneficial cooperation: Effects of type I errors," Russian Journal of Economics, Elsevier, vol. 2(4), pages 375-401.
    5. Clemens, Georg & Rau, Holger A., 2014. "Do leniency policies facilitate collusion? Experimental evidence," DICE Discussion Papers 130, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    6. Chen, Zhiqi & Ghosh, Subhadip & Ross, Thomas W., 2015. "Denying leniency to cartel instigators: Costs and benefits," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 19-29.
    7. Catarina Marvão & Giancarlo Spagnolo, 2018. "Cartels and leniency: Taking stock of what we learnt," Chapters, in: Luis C. Corchón & Marco A. Marini (ed.), Handbook of Game Theory and Industrial Organization, Volume II, chapter 4, pages 57-90, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Christos Papahristodoulou, 2019. "Internal and External Cartel Stability: Numerical Solutions," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 53(4), pages 1451-1465, April.

  9. Bos, I. & Pot, E.A. & Peeters, R.J.A.P., 2010. "Competition versus collusion: the impact of consumer inertia," Research Memorandum 024, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Cited by:

    1. Guillem Roig, 2021. "Collusive equilibria with switching costs: The effect of consumer concentration," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 100-121, February.
    2. Pot, E.A. & Flesch, J. & Peeters, R.J.A.P. & Vermeulen, A.J., 2011. "Dynamic competition with consumer inertia," Research Memorandum 016, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    3. DREZE, Jacques & DURRE, Alain, 2013. "Fiscal integration and growth stimulation in Europe," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2013013, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    4. Roos, Nicolas de & Smirnov, Vladimir, 2021. "Collusion, price dispersion, and fringe competition," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).

  10. Bos, A.M. & Pot, E.A., 2010. "Welfare-enhancing hard core cartels," Research Memorandum 004, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Cited by:

    1. Panayiotis Agisilaou, 2013. "Collusion in Industrial Economics and Optimally Designed Leniency Programmes - A Survey," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Competition Policy (CCP) 2013-03, Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    2. Iwan Bos & Erik Pot, 2012. "On the possibility of welfare-enhancing hard core cartels," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 107(3), pages 199-216, November.

  11. Bos, I. & Pot, E.A. & Peeters, R.J.A.P., 2010. "Do antitrust agencies facilitate meetings in smoke-filled rooms?," Research Memorandum 030, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Cited by:

    1. Bos, I. & Pot, E.A. & Peeters, R.J.A.P., 2010. "Competition versus collusion: the impact of consumer inertia," Research Memorandum 024, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    2. Bos, A.M. & Letterie, W.A. & Vermeulen, A.J., 2013. "Antitrust as facilitating factor for collusion," Research Memorandum 011, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).

  12. Iwan Bos & Joseph E. Harrington, Jr., 2008. "Endogenous Cartel Formation with Heterogeneous Firms," Economics Working Paper Archive 544, The Johns Hopkins University,Department of Economics, revised Nov 2008.

    Cited by:

    1. Georg Clemens & Holger A. Rau, 2022. "Either with us or against us: experimental evidence on partial cartels," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 93(2), pages 237-257, September.
    2. Mariana Cunha & Paula Sarmento, 2012. "Does Vertical Integration Promote Downstream Incomplete Collusion? An Evaluation of Static and Dynamic Stability," FEP Working Papers 465, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    3. Helland, Eric & Sovinsky, Michelle, 2019. "Do Research Joint Ventures Serve a Collusive Function?," CEPR Discussion Papers 13533, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    4. Jeroen Hinloopen & Sander Onderstal, 2010. "Collusion and the Choice of Auction: An Experimental Study," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 10-120/1, Tinbergen Institute, revised 28 Mar 2013.
    5. Sovinsky, Michelle & Helland, Eric, 2012. "Do Research Joint Ventures Serve a Collusive Function?," Economic Research Papers 270429, University of Warwick - Department of Economics.
    6. Benjamin Radoc & Philip Amadeus Libre & Shanti Aubren Prado, 2020. "Incentive to squeal: an experiment on leniency programs for antitrust violators," Department of Economics, Ateneo de Manila University, Working Paper Series 202003, Department of Economics, Ateneo de Manila University.
    7. Swoboda, Sandra Maria, 2017. "Einfluss ausgewählter Determinanten auf die Kartellbildung und -stabilität: Eine Literaturstudie," Arbeitspapiere 176, University of Münster, Institute for Cooperatives.
    8. Iwan Bos & Marco A. Marini, 2020. "Collusion in Quality-Segmented Markets," Working Papers 22/20, Sapienza University of Rome, DISS.
    9. Tanja Artiga González & Markus Schmid & David Yermack, 2019. "Does Price Fixing Benefit Corporate Managers?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(10), pages 4813-4840, October.
    10. Trost, Michael, 2022. "Unraveling the spreading pattern of collusively effective competition clauses," Hohenheim Discussion Papers in Business, Economics and Social Sciences 01-2022, University of Hohenheim, Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences.
    11. Luke, Garrod & Matthew, Olczak, 2016. "Collusion under Imperfect Monitoring with Asymmetric Firms," MPRA Paper 70647, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. van den Berg, A.H.J. & Bos, A.M., 2011. "Collusion in a price-quantity oligopoly," Research Memorandum 039, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    13. Hattori, Keisuke, 2021. "Profit-Sharing vs Price-Fixing Collusion with Heterogeneous Firms," MPRA Paper 110800, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Iwan Bos & Joseph E. Harrington, 2015. "Competition Policy And Cartel Size," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 56(1), pages 133-153, February.
    15. Duso, Tomaso & Röller, Lars-Hendrik & Seldeslachts, Jo, 2010. "Collusion through Joint R&D: An Empirical Assessment," Discussion Paper Series of SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems 343, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich.
    16. Delina Agnosteva & Constantinos Syropoulos & Yoto V. Yotov, 2020. "Preferential Trade Liberalization with Endogenous Cartel Discipline: Implications for Welfare and Optimal Trade Policies," CESifo Working Paper Series 8554, CESifo.
    17. von Auer, Ludwig & Pham, Tu Anh, 2020. "Optimal Destabilization of Cartels," VfS Annual Conference 2020 (Virtual Conference): Gender Economics 224521, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    18. Karp, Larry & Simon, Leo, 2013. "Participation games and international environmental agreements: A non-parametric model," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 326-344.
    19. Harrington, Joseph E. & Hüschelrath, Kai & Laitenberger, Ulrich & Smuda, Florian, 2015. "The discontent cartel member and cartel collapse: The case of the German cement cartel," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 106-119.
    20. Bos, Iwan & Marini, Marco A. & Saulle, Riccardo, 2019. "Cartel Formation with Quality Differentiation," MPRA Paper 97820, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. Johannes Paha, 2013. "The Impact of Persistent Shocks and Concave Objective Functions on Collusive Behavior," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201328, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    22. Garrod, Luke & Olczak, Matthew, 2016. "Collusion, Firm Numbers and Asymmetries Revisited," MPRA Paper 74352, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    23. António Brandão & Joana Pinho & Hélder Vasconcelos, 2014. "Asymmetric Collusion with Growing Demand," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 429-472, December.
    24. Dong, Ailin & Massa, Massimo & Zaldokas, Alminas, 2016. "Busted! Now What? Effects of Cartel Enforcement on Firm Value and Corporate Policies," CEPR Discussion Papers 11470, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    25. Argenton, Cédric, 2019. "Colluding on excluding," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 194-206.
    26. Ferrés, Daniel & Ormazabal, Gaizka & Povel, Paul & Sertsios, Giorgo, 2021. "Capital structure under collusion," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    27. Jihyun Park & Juhyun Lee & Suneung Ahn, 2018. "Bayesian Approach for Estimating the Probability of Cartel Penalization under the Leniency Program," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, June.
    28. Rausser, Gordon & Stuermer, Martin, 2020. "A Dynamic Analysis of Collusive Action: The Case of the World Copper Market, 1882-2016," MPRA Paper 104708, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    29. Roos, Nicolas de & Smirnov, Vladimir, 2021. "Collusion, price dispersion, and fringe competition," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    30. Aya Ahmed, 2015. "Asymmetric cartel formation under trade liberalization: Heterogeneous ï¬ rms with capacity constraints," Working Papers 2015.02, International Network for Economic Research - INFER.
    31. Hannes Wallimann & David Imhof & Martin Huber, 2020. "A Machine Learning Approach for Flagging Incomplete Bid-rigging Cartels," Papers 2004.05629, arXiv.org.
    32. Guillaume Cheikbossian & Philippe Mahenc, 2018. "On the Difficulty of Collusion in the Presence of a More Efficient Outsider," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 174(4), pages 595-628, December.
    33. Simon Loertscher & Leslie M. Marx, 2019. "Mix-and-Match Divestitures and Merger Harm," The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 70(3), pages 346-366, September.
    34. Gomez-Martinez, Francisco, 2017. "Partial Cartels and Mergers with Heterogenous Firms: Experimental Evidence," EconStor Preprints 169380, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    35. Hasnas, Irina & Wey, Christian, 2015. "Full versus partial collusion among brands and private label producers," DICE Discussion Papers 190, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    36. Chen, Zhiqi & Ghosh, Subhadip & Ross, Thomas W., 2015. "Denying leniency to cartel instigators: Costs and benefits," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 19-29.
    37. Matthew Weinberg & Gloria Sheu & Nathan Miller, 2019. "Oligopolistic Price Leadership and Mergers: An Empirical Model of the U.S. Beer Industry," 2019 Meeting Papers 1210, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    38. Gustavo Piga, 2011. "A Fighting Chance Against Corruption in Public Procurement?," Chapters, in: Susan Rose-Ackerman & Tina Søreide (ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Corruption, Volume Two, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    39. Swoboda, Sandra Maria, 2018. "Market structure and cartel duration: Evidence from detected EU cartel cases," Arbeitspapiere 184, University of Münster, Institute for Cooperatives.
    40. Simon Loertscher & Leslie M. Marx, 2021. "Coordinated Effects in Merger Review," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 64(4), pages 705-744.
    41. Omkar Palsule-Desai, 2016. "Impact of equity and equality on stability and collusion in a decentralized network," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 411-447, March.
    42. Roman Inderst & Frank Maier-Rigaud & Ulrich Schwalbe, 2013. "Umbrella Effects," Working Papers 2013-ECO-17, IESEG School of Management.
    43. Catarina Marvão & Giancarlo Spagnolo, 2018. "Cartels and leniency: Taking stock of what we learnt," Chapters, in: Luis C. Corchón & Marco A. Marini (ed.), Handbook of Game Theory and Industrial Organization, Volume II, chapter 4, pages 57-90, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    44. Harrington, Joseph E. & Hüschelrath, Kai & Laitenberger, Ulrich, 2016. "Rent sharing to control non-cartel supply in the German cement market," ZEW Discussion Papers 16-025, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    45. Koski, Heli, 2018. "How Do Competition Policy and Data Brokers Shape Product Market Competition?," ETLA Working Papers 61, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    46. Grüb, Jens, 2019. "Mergers and partial tacit collusion," Hohenheim Discussion Papers in Business, Economics and Social Sciences 15-2019, University of Hohenheim, Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences.
    47. Arai Koki, 2013. "Analyzing the Motivations of a Joint Venture to Provide High-Quality Music Download Service to Mobile Phones," Asian Journal of Law and Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1-2), pages 1-31, December.
    48. Margaret C. Levenstein & Valerie Y. Suslow, 2016. "Price Fixing Hits Home: An Empirical Study of US Price-Fixing Conspiracies," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 48(4), pages 361-379, June.
    49. Garrod, Luke & Olczak, Matthew, 2018. "Explicit vs tacit collusion: The effects of firm numbers and asymmetries," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 1-25.
    50. Ferrés, Daniel & Marcet, Francisco, 2021. "Corporate social responsibility and corporate misconduct," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    51. Gomez-Martinez, Francisco, 2016. "Partial Cartels and Mergers with Heterogeneous Firms: Experimental Evidence," MPRA Paper 81132, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 Jul 2017.
    52. Amore, Mario Daniele & Marzano, Riccardo, 2019. "Family Ownership and Antitrust Violations," CEPR Discussion Papers 14018, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    53. Stefan Napel & Dominik Welter, 2017. "Responsibility-based allocation of cartel damages," Working Papers 171, Bavarian Graduate Program in Economics (BGPE).
    54. Hasan, Iftekhar & Marinc, Matej, 2013. "Should competition policy in banking be amended during crises? : Lessons from the EU," Research Discussion Papers 7/2013, Bank of Finland.
    55. Iwan Bos & Frederick Wandschneider, 2011. "Cartel Ringleaders and the Corporate Leniency Program," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Competition Policy (CCP) 2011-13, Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    56. Ludwig von Auer & Tu Anh Pham, 2019. "Optimal Destabilization of Cartels," Research Papers in Economics 2019-07, University of Trier, Department of Economics.
    57. Hüschelrath, Kai & Veith, Tobias, 2011. "The impact of cartelization on pricing dynamics: Evidence from the German cement industry," ZEW Discussion Papers 11-067, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    58. Ay?e Gül Mermer & Sander Onderstal & Joep Sonnemans, 2022. "Can Communication Mitigate Strategic Delays in Investment Timing?," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 22-065/I, Tinbergen Institute.
    59. Katsoulacos, Yannis & Motchenkova, Evgenia & Ulph, David, 2020. "Combining cartel penalties and private damage actions: The impact on cartel prices," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    60. Omkar D. Palsule-Desai, 2016. "Impact of equity and equality on stability and collusion in a decentralized network," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 411-447, March.
    61. Fagart, Thomas, 2022. "Collusion in capacity under irreversible investment," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    62. Trost, Michael, 2021. "The collusive efficacy of competition clauses in Bertrand Markets with capacity-constrained retailers," Hohenheim Discussion Papers in Business, Economics and Social Sciences 04-2021, University of Hohenheim, Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences.
    63. Hinloopen, Jeroen & Onderstal, Sander, 2014. "Going once, going twice, reported! Cartel activity and the effectiveness of antitrust policies in experimental auctions," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 317-336.
    64. Darong DAI & Kunrong SHEN, 2014. "Stochastic evolutionary cartel formation," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 0(1(590)), pages 7-26, January.
    65. Odenkirchen, Johannes, 2017. "Pricing Behavior of Cartel Outsiders in Incomplete Cartels," VfS Annual Conference 2017 (Vienna): Alternative Structures for Money and Banking 168309, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    66. Johannes Paha, 2010. "Simulation and Prosecution of a Cartel with Endogenous Cartel Formation," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201007, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).

Articles

  1. Bos Iwan & Vermeulen Dries, 2022. "On the Microfoundation of Linear Oligopoly Demand," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 22(1), pages 1-15, January.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  2. Bos, Iwan & Vermeulen, Dries, 2021. "On pure-strategy Nash equilibria in price–quantity games," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    See citations under working paper version above.
  3. Bos, Iwan & Marini, Marco A. & Saulle, Riccardo D., 2020. "Cartel formation with quality differentiation," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 36-50.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  4. Bos, Iwan & Marini, Marco A., 2019. "Cartel stability under quality differentiation," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 70-73.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  5. Iwan Bos & Wilko Letterie & Nina Scherl, 2019. "Industry Impact Of Cartels: Evidence From The Stock Market1," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 15(2-3), pages 358-379.

    Cited by:

    1. Aditya Bhattacharjea & Oindrila De, 2021. "India’s Cartel Penalty Practices, Optimal Restitution and Deterrence," IEG Working Papers 424, Institute of Economic Growth.

  6. Bos, Iwan & Davies, Stephen & Harrington, Joseph E. & Ormosi, Peter L., 2018. "Does enforcement deter cartels? A tale of two tails," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 372-405.

    Cited by:

    1. Berkay Akyapi & Douglas C. Turner, 2022. "Cartel Penalties Under Endogenous Detection," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 61(3), pages 341-371, November.
    2. Joan-Ramon Borrell & Carmen García & Juan Luis Jiménez & José Manuel Ordóñez-de-Haro, 2022. ""Cartel destabilization effect of leniency programs"," IREA Working Papers 202213, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Sep 2022.
    3. Yannis Katsoulacos & Evgenia (E.) Motchenkova & David Ulph, 2017. "Penalising on the basis of the severity of the offence: A sophisticated revenue-based cartel penalty," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 17-120/VII, Tinbergen Institute.
    4. Winand Emons, 2018. "The Effectiveness of Leniency Programs when Firms choose the Degree of Collusion," Diskussionsschriften dp1816, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft.
    5. Fischer, Christian & Normann, Hans-Theo, 2019. "Collusion and bargaining in asymmetric Cournot duopoly—An experiment," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 360-379.
    6. Catarina Marvão & Giancarlo Spagnolo, 2018. "Cartels and leniency: Taking stock of what we learnt," Chapters, in: Luis C. Corchón & Marco A. Marini (ed.), Handbook of Game Theory and Industrial Organization, Volume II, chapter 4, pages 57-90, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Katsoulacos, Yannis & Motchenkova, Evgenia & Ulph, David, 2020. "Combining cartel penalties and private damage actions: The impact on cartel prices," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).

  7. van den Berg, Anita & Bos, Iwan, 2017. "Collusion in a price-quantity oligopoly," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 159-185.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  8. Iwan Bos & Ronald Peeters & Erik Pot, 2017. "Competition versus collusion: The impact of consumer inertia," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 13(4), pages 387-400, December.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  9. Bos Iwan & Letterie Wilko & Vermeulen Dries, 2015. "Antitrust as Facilitating Factor for Collusion," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 15(2), pages 797-814, April.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  10. Iwan Bos & Frederick Wandschneider, 2013. "A note on cartel ringleaders and the corporate leniency programme," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(11), pages 1100-1103, July.

    Cited by:

    1. Joseph E. Harrington Jr. & Myong-Hun Chang, 2015. "When Can We Expect a Corporate Leniency Program to Result in Fewer Cartels?," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 58(2), pages 417-449.
    2. Rau, Holger & Clemens, Georg, 2014. "Do Leniency Policies facilitate Collusion? Experimental Evidence," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100509, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    3. Clemens, Georg & Rau, Holger A., 2014. "Do leniency policies facilitate collusion? Experimental evidence," DICE Discussion Papers 130, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    4. Georg Clemens & Holger A. Rau, 2019. "Do discriminatory leniency policies fight hard‐core cartels?," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 336-354, April.
    5. Jochem, Annabelle & Parrotta, Pierpaolo & Valletta, Giacomo, 2020. "The impact of the 2002 reform of the EU leniency program on cartel outcomes," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    6. Annabelle Jochem & Pierpaolo Parrotta & Giacomo Valletta, 2020. "The impact of the 2002 reform of the EU leniency program on cartel outcomes," Post-Print hal-03131313, HAL.

  11. Iwan Bos & Ronald Peeters & Erik Pot, 2013. "Do antitrust agencies facilitate meetings in smoke-filled rooms?," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(6), pages 611-614, April.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  12. van den Berg, Anita & Bos, Iwan & Herings, P. Jean-Jacques & Peters, Hans, 2012. "Dynamic Cournot duopoly with intertemporal capacity constraints," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 174-192.

    Cited by:

    1. van den Berg, A.H.J. & Bos, A.M., 2011. "Collusion in a price-quantity oligopoly," Research Memorandum 039, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    2. Berk, Istemi, 2015. "Two-Period Resource Duopoly with Endogenous Intertemporal Capacity Constraints," EWI Working Papers 2014-13, Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universitaet zu Koeln (EWI).
    3. Pierre Bernhard & Marc Deschamps, 2016. "Dynamic equilibrium in games with randomly arriving players," Working Papers hal-01394813, HAL.
    4. Ruda Zhang & Roger Ghanem, 2020. "Multi-market Oligopoly of Equal Capacity," Papers 2012.06742, arXiv.org.
    5. James D. Dana Jr. & Kevin R. Williams, 2018. "Oligopoly Price Discrimination: The Role of Inventory Controls," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2136, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    6. James D. Dana Jr. & Kevin R. Williams, 2018. "Intertemporal Price Discrimination in Sequential Quantity-Price Games," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2136R2, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, revised Mar 2019.
    7. James D. Dana Jr. & Kevin R. Williams, 2020. "Intertemporal Price Discrimination in Sequential Quantity-Price Games," NBER Working Papers 26794, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. James D. Dana Jr. & Kevin R. Williams, 2018. "Oligopoly Price Discrimination: The Role of Inventory Controls," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2136R, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, revised Sep 2018.
    9. James D. Dana Jr. & Kevin R. Williams, 2018. "Intertemporal Price Discrimination in Sequential Quantity-Price Games," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2136R3, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, revised Feb 2020.
    10. Pierre Bernhard & Marc Deschamps, 2016. "Cournot oligopoly with randomly arriving producers," Working Papers hal-01413910, HAL.
    11. van den Berg, A.H.J. & Herings, P.J.J. & Peters, H.J.M., 2014. "The economic order decision with continuous dynamic pricing and batch supply," Research Memorandum 001, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    12. James D. Dana Jr. & Kevin R. Williams, 2018. "This paper develops an oligopoly model in which firms first choose capacity and then compete in prices in a series of advance-purchase markets. We show the existence of multiple sales opportunities cr," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2136R4, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, revised Nov 2021.

  13. Iwan Bos & Erik Pot, 2012. "On the possibility of welfare-enhancing hard core cartels," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 107(3), pages 199-216, November.

    Cited by:

    1. In `t Veld, D. & Tuinstra, J., 2012. "Market-Induced Rationalization and Welfare Enhancing Cartels," CeNDEF Working Papers 12-06, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Center for Nonlinear Dynamics in Economics and Finance.

  14. Iwan Bos & Joseph E. Harrington, Jr, 2010. "Endogenous cartel formation with heterogeneous firms," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 41(1), pages 92-117, March.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  15. Iwan Bos & Maarten Pieter Schinkel, 2006. "On The Scope For The European Commission'S 2006 Fining Guidelines Underthe Legal Maximum Fine," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 2(4), pages 673-682.

    Cited by:

    1. Bageri, Vasiliki & Katsoulacos, Yannis & Spagnolo, Giancarlo, 2013. "The Distortive Effects of Antitrust Fines Based on Revenue," CEPR Discussion Papers 9518, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Katsoulacos, Yannis & Motchenkova, Evgenia & Ulph, David, 2020. "Combining cartel penalties and private damage actions: The impact on cartel prices," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 28 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-COM: Industrial Competition (26) 2008-09-29 2009-02-28 2010-03-28 2010-05-22 2010-06-18 2013-04-13 2014-02-02 2015-09-26 2018-09-03 2019-01-14 2019-02-04 2019-02-04 2019-07-29 2019-07-29 2020-01-06 2020-01-20 2020-12-14 2021-01-18 2021-03-15 2021-04-05 2021-04-19 2021-04-26 2021-09-06 2022-01-31 2022-02-07 2022-02-28. Author is listed
  2. NEP-GTH: Game Theory (16) 2015-09-26 2018-09-03 2019-01-14 2019-07-29 2020-01-06 2020-01-20 2020-12-14 2021-01-18 2021-03-15 2021-04-05 2021-04-19 2021-04-26 2021-09-06 2022-01-31 2022-02-07 2022-02-28. Author is listed
  3. NEP-IND: Industrial Organization (15) 2010-03-28 2010-06-18 2013-06-16 2014-02-02 2018-09-03 2019-01-14 2019-02-04 2019-07-29 2019-07-29 2020-01-06 2020-01-20 2020-12-14 2021-01-18 2021-04-05 2021-04-19. Author is listed
  4. NEP-CWA: Central & Western Asia (6) 2021-04-05 2021-04-19 2021-09-06 2022-01-31 2022-02-07 2022-02-28. Author is listed
  5. NEP-REG: Regulation (4) 2021-09-06 2022-01-31 2022-02-07 2022-02-28
  6. NEP-BEC: Business Economics (3) 2010-03-28 2013-04-13 2022-02-07
  7. NEP-MIC: Microeconomics (3) 2008-09-29 2015-09-26 2019-07-29
  8. NEP-ORE: Operations Research (3) 2019-07-29 2020-01-06 2022-01-31
  9. NEP-CDM: Collective Decision-Making (2) 2020-01-06 2020-01-20
  10. NEP-LAW: Law & Economics (2) 2009-02-28 2021-07-26
  11. NEP-CSE: Economics of Strategic Management (1) 2010-05-22
  12. NEP-CTA: Contract Theory & Applications (1) 2013-04-13
  13. NEP-EXP: Experimental Economics (1) 2021-02-01
  14. NEP-HPE: History & Philosophy of Economics (1) 2015-09-26
  15. NEP-ISF: Islamic Finance (1) 2021-09-06
  16. NEP-PPM: Project, Program & Portfolio Management (1) 2009-02-28

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Iwan Bos should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.