IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/poicbe/v11y2017i1p637-648n68.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Operational risk quantification and modelling within Romanian insurance industry

Author

Listed:
  • Tudor Răzvan

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Badea Dumitru

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

This paper aims at covering and describing the shortcomings of various models used to quantify and model the operational risk within insurance industry with a particular focus on Romanian specific regulation: Norm 6/2015 concerning the operational risk issued by IT systems. While most of the local insurers are focusing on implementing the standard model to compute the Operational Risk solvency capital required, the local regulator has issued a local norm that requires to identify and assess the IT based operational risks from an ISO 27001 perspective. The challenges raised by the correlations assumed in the Standard model are substantially increased by this new regulation that requires only the identification and quantification of the IT operational risks. The solvency capital requirement stipulated by the implementation of Solvency II doesn’t recommend a model or formula on how to integrate the newly identified risks in the Operational Risk capital requirements. In this context we are going to assess the academic and practitioner’s understanding in what concerns: The Frequency-Severity approach, Bayesian estimation techniques, Scenario Analysis and Risk Accounting based on risk units, and how they could support the modelling of operational risk that are IT based. Developing an internal model only for the operational risk capital requirement proved to be, so far, costly and not necessarily beneficial for the local insurers. As the IT component will play a key role in the future of the insurance industry, the result of this analysis will provide a specific approach in operational risk modelling that can be implemented in the context of Solvency II, in a particular situation when (internal or external) operational risk databases are scarce or not available.

Suggested Citation

  • Tudor Răzvan & Badea Dumitru, 2017. "Operational risk quantification and modelling within Romanian insurance industry," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 637-648, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:637-648:n:68
    DOI: 10.1515/picbe-2017-0068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/picbe-2017-0068
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/picbe-2017-0068?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Răzvan TUDOR & Dumitru Gh. BADEA, 2016. "Operational risk assessment with Bayesian beliefs networks – successful application in other industries. New approaches that could fit Solvency 2," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 0(Special(I), pages 9-18.
    2. Taleb, Nassim Nicholas, 2009. "Errors, robustness, and the fourth quadrant," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 744-759, October.
    3. Tripp, Michael Howard & Bradley, H. L. & Devitt, R. & Orros, G. C. & Overton, G. L. & Pryor, L. M. & Shaw, R. A., 2004. "Quantifying Operational Risk in General Insurance Companies. Developed by a Giro Working Party," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(5), pages 919-1012, December.
    4. Neil, Martin & Fenton, Norman, 2008. "Using Bayesian networks to model the operational risk to information technology infrastructure in financial institutions," Journal of Financial Transformation, Capco Institute, vol. 22, pages 131-138.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ersilia CATRINA, 2018. "Insurance, A Guaranteed Risk Or A Risk Assumed?," Junior Scientific Researcher, SC Research Publishing SRL, vol. 4(1), pages 121-133, May.
    2. CATRINA, Ersilia, 2018. "Insurance, A Guaranteed Risk Or A Risk Assumed?," MPRA Paper 87769, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Apr 2018.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. N. N. Taleb & R. Douady, 2013. "Mathematical definition, mapping, and detection of (anti)fragility," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(11), pages 1677-1689, November.
    2. Hendry, David F. & Mizon, Grayham E., 2014. "Unpredictability in economic analysis, econometric modeling and forecasting," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 182(1), pages 186-195.
    3. Taleb, Nassim N. & Tapiero, Charles S., 2010. "Risk externalities and too big to fail," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(17), pages 3503-3507.
    4. Makridakis, Spyros & Spiliotis, Evangelos & Assimakopoulos, Vassilios, 2020. "The M4 Competition: 100,000 time series and 61 forecasting methods," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 54-74.
    5. Ahmad Hajihasani & Ali Namaki & Nazanin Asadi & Reza Tehrani, 2020. "Non-Extensive Value-at-Risk Estimation During Times of Crisis," Papers 2005.09036, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2021.
    6. Hendry, David F. & Mizon, Grayham E., 2014. "Unpredictability in economic analysis, econometric modeling and forecasting," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 182(1), pages 186-195.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:637-648:n:68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.