IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/respol/v48y2019i3p584-600.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“All for One and One for All?” - Knowledge broker roles in managing tensions of internal coopetition: The Ubisoft case

Author

Listed:
  • Chiambaretto, Paul
  • Massé, David
  • Mirc, Nicola

Abstract

Coopetition, i.e., cooperation between competing actors, has become a pervasive strategy for innovative firms. The primary focus of studies investigating coopetition centers on inter-firm relationships, highlighting the benefits, limits and configurational patterns of cooperative relationships between competing firms. Only a small, emerging group of studies seeks to extend the concept to the intra-firm level, stressing the existence and effects of competition and cooperation between units that are part of the same organization. This paper contributes to this latter group by investigating the effects of internal coopetition on knowledge and innovation sharing and highlighting the fundamental role of knowledge brokers in managing the resulting tensions. Based on a qualitative case study of the video game publisher Ubisoft, we stress how the tensions raised by internal coopetitive settings limit knowledge sharing between units, and we analyze the mechanisms through which the knowledge broker helps to overcome these limits. We identify three main functions of this knowledge broker that allow the promotion of knowledge and innovation transfer to occur between coopeting units: (1) protecting the unit’s competitive advantage by introducing a lagging principle in the transfer process, (2) reducing sharing costs by standardizing innovative solutions, and (3) enhancing awareness of and trust in innovative solutions by centralizing knowledge diffusion.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiambaretto, Paul & Massé, David & Mirc, Nicola, 2019. "“All for One and One for All?” - Knowledge broker roles in managing tensions of internal coopetition: The Ubisoft case," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 584-600.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:respol:v:48:y:2019:i:3:p:584-600
    DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733318302415
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Colette Depeyre & Hervé Dumez, 2010. "The role of architectural players in coopetition: the case of the US defense industry," Post-Print hal-00539561, HAL.
    2. Justin J.P. Jansen & Frans A.J. Van den Bosch & Henk W. Volberda, 2005. "Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, And Ambidexterity: The Impact Of Environmental And Organizational Antecedents," Schmalenbach Business Review (sbr), LMU Munich School of Management, vol. 57(4), pages 351-363, October.
    3. Wenpin Tsai, 2002. "Social Structure of “Coopetition” Within a Multiunit Organization: Coordination, Competition, and Intraorganizational Knowledge Sharing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 179-190, April.
    4. Bruce Kogut & Udo Zander, 1992. "Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(3), pages 383-397, August.
    5. repec:bla:stratm:v:15:y:1994:i:s2:p:91-112 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Duc De Ngo & Mahito Okura, 2008. "Coopetition in a Mixed Duopoly Market," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 12(21), pages 1-9.
    7. Howells, Jeremy, 2006. "Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 715-728, June.
    8. Rauno Rusko, 2015. "New business model: intentional and unintentional degree one and degree two consumer coopetition in a branch of the Finnish game industry," International Journal of Business Environment, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(3), pages 219-241.
    9. Cillo, Paola, 2005. "Fostering Market Knowledge Use in Innovation:: The Role of Internal Brokers," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 404-412, August.
    10. Thuy Seran & Estelle Pellegrin-Boucher & Calin Gurau, 2016. "The management of coopetitive tensions within multi-unit organizations," Post-Print hal-02013744, HAL.
    11. Baruch, Yehuda & Lin, Chieh-Peng, 2012. "All for one, one for all: Coopetition and virtual team performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 79(6), pages 1155-1168.
    12. Cohendet, Patrick, et al, 1999. "Knowledge Coordination, Competence Creation and Integrated Networks in Globalised Firms," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(2), pages 225-241, March.
    13. Hong, Jacky F.L. & Snell, Robin Stanley, 2015. "Knowledge development through co-opetition: A case study of a Japanese foreign subsidiary and its local suppliers," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 50(4), pages 769-780.
    14. Michael L. Tushman & Ralph Katz, 1980. "External Communication and Project Performance: An Investigation into the Role of Gatekeepers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(11), pages 1071-1085, November.
    15. Bouncken, Ricarda B. & Kraus, Sascha, 2013. "Innovation in knowledge-intensive industries: The double-edged sword of coopetition," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 2060-2070.
    16. Ikujiro Nonaka, 1994. "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 14-37, February.
    17. Robert S. Huckman & Gary P. Pisano, 2006. "The Firm Specificity of Individual Performance: Evidence from Cardiac Surgery," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 473-488, April.
    18. Boari, Cristina & Riboldazzi, Federico, 2014. "How knowledge brokers emerge and evolve: The role of actors’ behaviour," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 683-695.
    19. repec:bla:stratm:v:29:y:2008:i:13:p:1465-1474 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. repec:spr:rvmgts:v:12:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11846-017-0269-5 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Thomas Paris & Lê Patrick & Massé David, 2013. " Technological Change at the Heart of the Creative Process: Insights From the Videogame Industry ," Post-Print halshs-00921155, HAL.
    22. Raymond van Wijk & Justin J. P. Jansen & Marjorie A. Lyles, 2008. "Inter- and Intra-Organizational Knowledge Transfer: A Meta-Analytic Review and Assessment of its Antecedents and Consequences," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(4), pages 830-853, June.
    23. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5571 is not listed on IDEAS
    24. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt & Claudia Bird Schoonhoven, 1996. "Resource-based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 136-150, April.
    25. Kenichi Ohkita & Mahito Okura, 2014. "Coopetition and coordinated investment: protecting Japanese video games' intellectual property rights," International Journal of Business Environment, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1), pages 92-105.
    26. Julian Birkinshaw & Robert Nobel & Jonas Ridderstråle, 2002. "Knowledge as a Contingency Variable: Do the Characteristics of Knowledge Predict Organization Structure?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 274-289, June.
    27. repec:bla:stratm:v:21:y:2000:i:4:p:473-496 is not listed on IDEAS
    28. Yehuda Baruch & Chieh-Peng Lin, 2012. "All for one, one for all: Coopetition and virtual team performance," Post-Print hal-00801978, HAL.
    29. Beth A. Bechky, 2003. "Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(3), pages 312-330, June.
    30. Kylänen, Mika & Rusko, Rauno, 2011. "Unintentional coopetition in the service industries: The case of Pyhä-Luosto tourism destination in the Finnish Lapland," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 193-205, June.
    31. Patrick S. Cohendet & Laurent O. Simon, 2016. "Always Playable: Recombining Routines for Creative Efficiency at Ubisoft Montreal’s Video Game Studio," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 614-632, June.
    32. Grady, Razak & Pratt, John, 2000. "The UK Technology Transfer System: Calls for Stronger Links between Higher Education and Industry," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 205-211, June.
    33. Gabriel Szulanski & Rossella Cappetta & Robert J. Jensen, 2004. "When and How Trustworthiness Matters: Knowledge Transfer and the Moderating Effect of Causal Ambiguity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(5), pages 600-613, October.
    34. Paul Chiambaretto & Hervé Dumez, 2016. "Toward a Typology of Coopetition: A Multilevel Approach," Post-Print hal-01504220, HAL.
    35. Frédéric Le Roy & Wojciech Czakon, 2016. "Managing coopetition: the missing link between strategy and performance," Post-Print hal-02012534, HAL.
    36. Anne-Sophie Fernandez & Paul Chiambaretto, 2016. "Managing tensions related to information in coopetition," Post-Print hal-02011849, HAL.
    37. Shahzad (Shaz) Ansari & Raghu Garud & Arun Kumaraswamy, 2016. "The disruptor's dilemma: TiVo and the U.S. television ecosystem," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(9), pages 1829-1853, September.
    38. Gnyawali, Devi R. & Park, Byung-Jin (Robert), 2011. "Co-opetition between giants: Collaboration with competitors for technological innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 650-663, June.
    39. Paul Chiambaretto & Călin Gurău & Frédéric Le Roy, 2016. "Coopetitive branding: Definition, typology, benefits and risks," Post-Print hal-02010660, HAL.
    40. Philippe Baumard,, 2010. "Learning in coopetitive environments," Post-Print hal-00539567, HAL.
    41. Kirkels, Yvonne & Duysters, Geert, 2010. "Brokerage in SME networks," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 375-385, April.
    42. repec:eee:worbus:v:53:y:2018:i:4:p:540-554 is not listed on IDEAS
    43. Luo, Yadong, 2005. "Toward coopetition within a multinational enterprise: a perspective from foreign subsidiaries," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 71-90, February.
    44. Daniel Z. Levin & Rob Cross, 2004. "The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(11), pages 1477-1490, November.
    45. Argote, Linda & Fahrenkopf, Erin, 2016. "Knowledge transfer in organizations: The roles of members, tasks, tools, and networks," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 146-159.
    46. Fréderic Le Roy & Anne-Sophie Fernandez, 2015. "Managing Coopetitive Tensions at the Working-group Level: The Rise of the Coopetitive Project Team," Post-Print hal-02011138, HAL.
    47. Paul Chiambaretto & Anne-Sophie Fernandez, 2016. "The evolution of coopetitive and collaborative alliances in an alliance portfolio: The Air France case," Post-Print hal-02010661, HAL.
    48. repec:bla:stratm:v:22:y:2001:i:12:p:1139-1161 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:respol:v:48:y:2019:i:3:p:584-600. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/respol .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.