IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbenv/v6y2014i1p92-105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coopetition and coordinated investment: protecting Japanese video games' intellectual property rights

Author

Listed:
  • Kenichi Ohkita
  • Mahito Okura

Abstract

This paper analyses coopetitive strategies pursued by game software firms faced with the problem of intellectual property rights violation. The most important finding is that although software firms have an incentive to invest in protecting their intellectual property rights, the amount invested without coopetition is lower than optimal. In other words, the situation where software firms cooperate by choosing the amount they invest but compete with quantities is desirable, but this cannot be realised if software firms have the option to voluntarily choose the amount they invest. On this basis, associations which game software firms join in exchange for a membership fee are useful as a mechanism to set an industry standard for investment and to cooperatively make efforts against illegal game software distributors.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenichi Ohkita & Mahito Okura, 2014. "Coopetition and coordinated investment: protecting Japanese video games' intellectual property rights," International Journal of Business Environment, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1), pages 92-105.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbenv:v:6:y:2014:i:1:p:92-105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=58025
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paul Chiambaretto & David Massé & Nicola Mirc, 2019. "“All for One and One for All?” - Knowledge broker roles in managing tensions of internal coopetition: The Ubisoft case," Post-Print hal-02104540, HAL.
    2. Chiambaretto, Paul & Massé, David & Mirc, Nicola, 2019. "“All for One and One for All?” - Knowledge broker roles in managing tensions of internal coopetition: The Ubisoft case," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 584-600.
    3. Patrycja Klimas & Ali Ashraf Ahmadian & Morteza Soltani & Meisam Shahbazi & Ali Hamidizadeh, 2023. "Coopetition, Where Do You Come From? Identification, Categorization, and Configuration of Theoretical Roots of Coopetition," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440221, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbenv:v:6:y:2014:i:1:p:92-105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=69 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.