IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/agecon/v54y2023i5p697-708.html

Consumers’ valuation of a biofortified crop: Evidence from a laboratory experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Syed Imran Ali Meerza
  • Khondoker Mottaleb
  • Alwin Dsouza
  • Md. Shajedur Rahaman
  • Md. Abdur Rouf Sarkar

Abstract

Malnutrition among women of reproductive age and children remains one of the major issues in developing countries, particularly zinc deficiency. Zinc deficiency hinders cognitive and physical development in children as well as adults. This study utilized a non‐hypothetical laboratory valuation experiment to analyze whether positive information about biofortified rice affects consumers’ valuations of biofortified as well as non‐biofortified rice. Specifically, we designed a within‐subject experiment based on Becker‐DeGroot‐Marschak (BDM) auction mechanism to compare consumers’ valuations of zinc‐biofortified and popular non‐biofortified rice varieties before and after exposure to information about the health benefits of zinc‐biofortified rice. We conducted our experiments in randomly selected four districts of Bangladesh, and a total of 134 consumers participated in our study. Results reveal that consumers assign a significant premium to zinc‐biofortified rice when they receive information about zinc‐biofortified rice and its health benefits. Intriguingly, positive information about zinc‐biofortified rice negatively affects the valuation of non‐biofortified rice varieties, suggesting negative spillover effects. Moreover, our results also identify that both the information provision and labeling are important to increase consumer demand for zinc‐biofortified rice.

Suggested Citation

  • Syed Imran Ali Meerza & Khondoker Mottaleb & Alwin Dsouza & Md. Shajedur Rahaman & Md. Abdur Rouf Sarkar, 2023. "Consumers’ valuation of a biofortified crop: Evidence from a laboratory experiment," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 54(5), pages 697-708, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:54:y:2023:i:5:p:697-708
    DOI: 10.1111/agec.12795
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12795
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/agec.12795?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chantal Toledo & Sofia Berto Villas-Boas, 2019. "Safe or Not? Consumer Responses to Recalls with Traceability," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(3), pages 519-541, September.
    2. Konstantinos Giannakas, 2002. "Information Asymmetries and Consumption Decisions in Organic Food Product Markets," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 50(1), pages 35-50, March.
    3. Adewale Oparinde & Abhijit Banerji & Ekin Birol & Paul Ilona, 2016. "Information and consumer willingness to pay for biofortified yellow cassava: evidence from experimental auctions in Nigeria," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 47(2), pages 215-233, March.
    4. A. Colin Cameron & Douglas L. Miller, 2015. "A Practitioner’s Guide to Cluster-Robust Inference," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 50(2), pages 317-372.
    5. A. Colin Cameron & Jonah B. Gelbach & Douglas L. Miller, 2008. "Bootstrap-Based Improvements for Inference with Clustered Errors," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 90(3), pages 414-427, August.
    6. William Vickrey, 1961. "Counterspeculation, Auctions, And Competitive Sealed Tenders," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 16(1), pages 8-37, March.
    7. Meerza, Syed Imran Ali & Gustafson, Christopher R., 2020. "Consumers’ Response to Food Fraud: Evidence from Experimental Auctions," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 45(2), March.
    8. Alan de Brauw & Patrick Eozenou & Daniel O Gilligan & Christine Hotz & Neha Kumar & J V Meenakshi, 2018. "Biofortification, Crop Adoption and Health Information: Impact Pathways in Mozambique and Uganda," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 100(3), pages 906-930.
    9. Olivier Bonroy & Christos Constantatos, 2015. "On the Economics of Labels: How Their Introduction Affects the Functioning of Markets and the Welfare of All Participants," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 97(1), pages 239-259.
    10. Hugo De Groote & Simon Chege Kimenju & Ulrich B. Morawetz, 2011. "Estimating consumer willingness to pay for food quality with experimental auctions: the case of yellow versus fortified maize meal in Kenya," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 42(1), pages 1-16, January.
    11. repec:ken:wpaper:0601 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. repec:fpr:issbrf:9780896298552 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Keith Finlay & Leandro M. Magnusson, 2009. "Implementing weak-instrument robust tests for a general class of instrumental-variables models," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 9(3), pages 398-421, September.
    14. Meerza, Syed Imran Ali & Giannakas, Konstantinos & Yiannaka, Amalia, . "Markets and welfare effects of food fraud," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(4).
    15. Adewale Oparinde & Ekin Birol & Abdoul Murekezi & Lister Katsvairo & Michael T. Diressie & Jean d'amour Nkundimana & Louis Butare, 2016. "Radio Messaging Frequency, Information Framing, and Consumer Willingness to Pay for Biofortified Iron Beans: Evidence from Revealed Preference Elicitation in Rural Rwanda," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 64(4), pages 613-652, December.
    16. David Roodman & James G. MacKinnon & Morten Ørregaard Nielsen & Matthew D. Webb, 2019. "Fast and wild: Bootstrap inference in Stata using boottest," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 19(1), pages 4-60, March.
    17. Jay R. Corrigan & Matthew C. Rousu, 2006. "The Effect of Initial Endowments in Experimental Auctions," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 88(2), pages 448-457.
    18. Banerji, Abhijit & Birol, Ekin & Karandikar, Bhushana & Rampal, Jeevant, 2016. "Information, branding, certification, and consumer willingness to pay for high-iron pearl millet: Evidence from experimental auctions in Maharashtra, India," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 133-141.
    19. Syed Imran Ali Meerza & Konstantinos Giannakas & Amalia Yiannaka, 2019. "Markets and welfare effects of food fraud," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(4), pages 759-789, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Meng Wang & Jihong Ge & Xuesen Fan & Wuyang Hu, 2025. "Price premiums for geographical indication under the coexistence of self‐claims and certification," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 69(2), pages 422-439, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Wenjie, 2021. "Wild Bootstrap for Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments and Few Clusters," MPRA Paper 106227, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Murekezi, Abdoul & Oparinde, Adewale & Birol, Ekin, 2017. "Consumer market segments for biofortified iron beans in Rwanda: Evidence from a hedonic testing study," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 35-49.
    3. Herrington, Caitlin L. & Maredia, Mywish & Ortega, David L. & Taleon, Victor & Birol, Ekin & Sarkar, Abdur Rouf & Rahaman, Shajedur, 2021. "Rural Bangladeshi Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Rice with Improved Nutrition via Zinc Biofortified Rice and Decreased Milling Practices," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315079, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Abate, Gashaw T. & Bernard, Tanguy & Deutschmann, Joshua & Fall, Fatou, 2025. "Do others’ health count for peanuts? Health, market returns, and pro-sociality," IFPRI discussion papers 2346, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    5. Gric, Zuzana & Ehrenbergerova, Dominika & Hodula, Martin, 2022. "The power of sentiment: Irrational beliefs of households and consumer loan dynamics," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    6. James G. MacKinnon & Morten Ørregaard Nielsen & Matthew D. Webb, 2023. "Fast and reliable jackknife and bootstrap methods for cluster‐robust inference," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(5), pages 671-694, August.
    7. Doremus, Jacqueline, 2019. "Unintended impacts from forest certification: Evidence from indigenous Aka households in Congo," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Meinhofer, Angélica & Witman, Allison E. & Hinde, Jesse M. & Simon, Kosali, 2021. "Marijuana liberalization policies and perinatal health," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    9. van Horen, Neeltje & Kotidis, Antonios, 2018. "Repo market functioning: The role of capital regulation," CEPR Discussion Papers 13090, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    10. Anderson, D. Mark & Charles, Kerwin Kofi & Karbownik, Krzysztof & Rees, Daniel I. & Steffens, Camila, 2025. "Civil rights protests and election outcomes: Exploring the effects of the poor people’s campaign," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    11. James G. MacKinnon, 2019. "How cluster-robust inference is changing applied econometrics," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 52(3), pages 851-881, August.
    12. Chowdhury, Reajul & Crost, Benjamin & Hoffmann, Vivian, 2022. "Marketing fortified rice: Effects of aspirational messaging and association with free distribution," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    13. Raza, Wameq A. & Van de Poel, Ellen & Van Ourti, Tom, 2018. "Impact and spill-over effects of an asset transfer program on child undernutrition: Evidence from a randomized control trial in Bangladesh," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 105-120.
    14. Wang, Wenjie & Zhang, Yichong, 2024. "Wild bootstrap inference for instrumental variables regressions with weak and few clusters," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 241(1).
    15. Nico Neumann & Catherine E. Tucker & Levi Kaplan & Alan Mislove & Piotr Sapiezynski, 2024. "Data Deserts and Black Boxes: The Impact of Socio-Economic Status on Consumer Profiling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(11), pages 8003-8029, November.
    16. Damian Clarke & Kathya Tapia-Schythe, 2021. "Implementing the panel event study," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 21(4), pages 853-884, December.
    17. Osun, Elif B. & Ozbay, Erkut Y., 2025. "Evidence games: Lying aversion and commitment," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 329-350.
    18. James G. MacKinnon & Morten Ørregaard Nielsen & Matthew D. Webb, 2023. "Leverage, influence, and the jackknife in clustered regression models: Reliable inference using summclust," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 23(4), pages 942-982, December.
    19. James G. MacKinnon & Morten Ørregaard Nielsen & Matthew D. Webb, 2021. "Wild Bootstrap and Asymptotic Inference With Multiway Clustering," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 505-519, March.
    20. James G. MacKinnon & Morten Ørregaard Nielsen & Matthew D. Webb, 2024. "Cluster-Robust Jackknife and Bootstrap Inference for Binary Response Models," Working Paper 1515, Economics Department, Queen's University.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:54:y:2023:i:5:p:697-708. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.