IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/apecpp/v48y2026i1p182-195.html

The Effects of Information Interventions and Social Interactions on the Valuations of Zinc Rice Seeds: Evidence From a Field Experiment With Rice Farmers

Author

Listed:
  • Syed Imran Ali Meerza
  • Khondoker Mottaleb

Abstract

Zinc biofortified rice presents a promising solution for addressing zinc deficiencies in developing countries, but its adoption is still very limited. Interventions that provide information on both demand and supply, along with social interactions, have the potential to increase farmers' adoption of biofortified crops such as zinc rice, though their combined effects are not well explored. Our study examines how information‐based interventions and social interactions impact smallholder farmers' valuations of zinc and non‐zinc rice seeds in the context of Bangladesh. Results reveal that demand‐side information about zinc rice alone significantly raises farmers' willingness to pay for zinc rice seeds and that additional supply‐side information further raises this premium. Our findings also indicate that combining information‐based interventions with social interactions among farmers had a synergistic effect, promoting greater adoption of zinc rice. The results provide a key policy implication that combining information‐based interventions with social interactions can effectively promote biofortified crops and other agricultural innovations.

Suggested Citation

  • Syed Imran Ali Meerza & Khondoker Mottaleb, 2026. "The Effects of Information Interventions and Social Interactions on the Valuations of Zinc Rice Seeds: Evidence From a Field Experiment With Rice Farmers," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(1), pages 182-195, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:48:y:2026:i:1:p:182-195
    DOI: 10.1002/aepp.70012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.70012
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/aepp.70012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chantal Toledo & Sofia Berto Villas-Boas, 2019. "Safe or Not? Consumer Responses to Recalls with Traceability," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(3), pages 519-541, September.
    2. repec:osf:osfxxx:3g4m5_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Gustafson, Christopher R. & Meerza, Syed Imran Ali, 2023. "The Impact of Information on Valuation in Experimental Auctions: A Comparison of Between and Within Subject Designs," OSF Preprints 3g4m5, Center for Open Science.
    4. Konstantinos Giannakas, 2002. "Information Asymmetries and Consumption Decisions in Organic Food Product Markets," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 50(1), pages 35-50, March.
    5. Munshi, Kaivan & Myaux, Jacques, 2006. "Social norms and the fertility transition," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 1-38, June.
    6. William Vickrey, 1961. "Counterspeculation, Auctions, And Competitive Sealed Tenders," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 16(1), pages 8-37, March.
    7. Munshi, Kaivan, 2004. "Social learning in a heterogeneous population: technology diffusion in the Indian Green Revolution," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 185-213, February.
    8. Magnan, Nicholas & Spielman, David J. & Lybbert, Travis J. & Gulati, Kajal, 2015. "Leveling with friends: Social networks and Indian farmers' demand for a technology with heterogeneous benefits," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 223-251.
    9. Timothy G. Conley & Christopher R. Udry, 2010. "Learning about a New Technology: Pineapple in Ghana," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(1), pages 35-69, March.
    10. Besley, T. & Case, A., 1994. "Diffusion as a Learning Process: Evidence from HYV Cotton," Papers 174, Princeton, Woodrow Wilson School - Development Studies.
    11. Meerza, Syed Imran Ali & Gustafson, Christopher R., 2020. "Consumers’ Response to Food Fraud: Evidence from Experimental Auctions," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 45(2), March.
    12. Kaleb Shiferaw Jada & Marrit van den Berg, 2024. "Social norms, nutrition messaging, and demand for biofortified staple crops: Evidence from a discrete choice experiment in Ethiopia," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 55(5), pages 695-713, September.
    13. repec:pri:rpdevs:besley_case_diffusion is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Alan de Brauw & Patrick Eozenou & Daniel O Gilligan & Christine Hotz & Neha Kumar & J V Meenakshi, 2018. "Biofortification, Crop Adoption and Health Information: Impact Pathways in Mozambique and Uganda," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 100(3), pages 906-930.
    15. Olivier Bonroy & Christos Constantatos, 2015. "On the Economics of Labels: How Their Introduction Affects the Functioning of Markets and the Welfare of All Participants," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 97(1), pages 239-259.
    16. Syed Imran Ali Meerza & Khondoker Mottaleb & Alwin Dsouza & Md. Shajedur Rahaman & Md. Abdur Rouf Sarkar, 2023. "Consumers’ valuation of a biofortified crop: Evidence from a laboratory experiment," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 54(5), pages 697-708, September.
    17. Banerji, Abhijit & Birol, Ekin & Karandikar, Bhushana & Rampal, Jeevant, 2016. "Information, branding, certification, and consumer willingness to pay for high-iron pearl millet: Evidence from experimental auctions in Maharashtra, India," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 133-141.
    18. repec:pri:rpdevs:besley_case_diffusion.pdf is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Syed Imran Ali Meerza & Khondoker Mottaleb & Alwin Dsouza & Md. Shajedur Rahaman & Md. Abdur Rouf Sarkar, 2023. "Consumers’ valuation of a biofortified crop: Evidence from a laboratory experiment," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 54(5), pages 697-708, September.
    2. Fishman, Arthur & Fishman, Ram & Gneezy, Uri, 2019. "A tale of two food stands: Observational learning in the field," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 101-108.
    3. B Kelsey Jack, "undated". "Market Inefficiencies and the Adoption of Agricultural Technologies in Developing Countries," CID Working Papers 50, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    4. Magnan, Nicholas & Spielman, David J. & Lybbert, Travis J. & Gulati, Kajal, 2015. "Leveling with friends: Social networks and Indian farmers' demand for a technology with heterogeneous benefits," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 223-251.
    5. Elisabeth SADOULET, 2016. "Review of Theories of Learning for Adopting," Working Papers P163, FERDI.
    6. Magnan, Nicholas & Spielman, David J. & Lybbert, Travis J. & Gulati, Kajal, "undated". "Leveling with Friends: Social Networks and Indian Farmers' Demand for Agricultural Custom Hire Services," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 150711, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Songsermsawas, Tisorn & Baylis, Kathy & Chhatre, Ashwini & Michelson, Hope, 2016. "Can Peers Improve Agricultural Revenue?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 163-178.
    8. Magnan, Nicholas & Spielman, David J. & Gulati, Kajal, 2013. "Female social networks and learning about a new technology in eastern Uttar Pradesh, India," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 150688, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    9. Nicholas Magnan & David J Spielman & Travis J. Lybbert & Kajal Gulati, 2013. "Leveling with Friends: Social Networks and Indian Farmers’ Demand for Agricultural Custom Hire Services," Working Papers id:5591, eSocialSciences.
    10. Raphaël Soubeyran, 2019. "Technology adoption and pro-social preferences," CEE-M Working Papers halshs-02291905, CEE-M, Universtiy of Montpellier, CNRS, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro.
    11. Khushbu Mishra & Abdoul G. Sam & Gracious M. Diiro & Mario J. Miranda, 2020. "Gender and the dynamics of technology adoption: Empirical evidence from a household‐level panel data," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(6), pages 857-870, November.
    12. Valera, Harold Glenn & Yamano, Takashi & Pede, Valerien & Puskur, Ranjitha & Habib, Muhammad Ashraful & Bashar, Khairul, 2021. "Impact of Nutrition Training on Long-Term Adoption of High Zinc Rice: A Randomized Control Trial Study Among Female Farmers in Bangladesh," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315165, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Kondylis, Florence & Mueller, Valerie, 2012. "Seeing is Believing? Evidence from a Demonstration Plot Experiment in Mozambique," Mozambique Working Paper 1, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    14. Rachid Laajaj & Karen Macours, 2026. "The Complexity of Multidimensional Learning in Agriculture," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 94(2), pages 465-503, March.
    15. Timothy G. Conley & Christopher R. Udry, 2010. "Learning about a New Technology: Pineapple in Ghana," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(1), pages 35-69, March.
    16. Fiona Burlig & Andrew W. Stevens, 2024. "Social networks and technology adoption: Evidence from church mergers in the U.S. Midwest," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(3), pages 1141-1166, May.
    17. Sébastien MARCHAND & Huanxiu GUO, 2013. "Is participatory social learning a performance driver for Chinese smallholder farmers?," Working Papers 201318, CERDI.
    18. Morgan, Stephen N. & Mason, Nicole M. & Maredia, Mywish K., 2020. "Lead-farmer extension and smallholder valuation of new agricultural technologies in Tanzania," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    19. Ma, Xingliang & Shi, Guanming, 2011. "A Dynamic Adoption Model with Bayesian Learning: Application to the U.S. Soybean Market," 2011 Annual Meeting, July 24-26, 2011, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 104577, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:48:y:2026:i:1:p:182-195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2040-5804 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.