IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/apecpp/v41y2019i3p519-541..html

Safe or Not? Consumer Responses to Recalls with Traceability

Author

Listed:
  • Chantal Toledo
  • Sofia Berto Villas-Boas

Abstract

Product traceability is advocated as a way to target non-compliant products in recalls and protect the sales of compliant products. Using a large scanner-level dataset from a national grocery chain and a difference-in-differences approach, we test whether consumers in California reduced egg purchases after three consecutive egg recalls during the 2010 Salmonella outbreak. In a setting where contaminated eggs could be traced to the box level, leaving no contaminated eggs in stores, we find a 7% to 9% reduction in egg sales following the recalls. The effect lasted at least three months. We find no evidence of overall substitution toward “greener” types of eggs, such as organic eggs. Finally, although the national grocery chain had contaminated eggs only in Northern California, we find reductions in egg sales in Southern Californian stores as well. Our results show that, even with traceability, consumers’ responses to recalls can negatively affect the sales of compliant products.

Suggested Citation

  • Chantal Toledo & Sofia Berto Villas-Boas, 2019. "Safe or Not? Consumer Responses to Recalls with Traceability," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 41(3), pages 519-541.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:apecpp:v:41:y:2019:i:3:p:519-541.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/aepp/ppy015
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wilson, Jeremy M. & Grammich, Clifford A., 2020. "Brand protection across the enterprise: Toward a total-business solution," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 363-376.
    2. repec:ags:aaea22:343750 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Gustafson, Christopher R. & Champetier, Antoine, 2024. "Information Choice vs. Exposure: An Experiment Examining the Impact of Honey Fraud Information on Consumer Valuation," 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA 343750, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Gupta, Sumedha & Nguyen, Thuy & Freeman, Patricia R. & Simon, Kosali, 2023. "Competitive effects of federal and state opioid restrictions: Evidence from the controlled substance laws," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    5. Xue, Yang-chen & Geng, Xian-hui & Kiprop, Emmanuel & Hong, Miao, 2020. "How Does the Spillover Effect Affect Companies Food Safety Risk Management? New Orientation of Food Safety Management," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304310, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Horeh, Marziyeh Bahalou & Elbakidze, Levan, 2022. "Produce Tracing from Farm to Wholesale and Food Safety in the U.S," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322357, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Lee, Young Gwan & Horeh, Marziyeh Bahalou & Elbakidze, Levan, 2025. "Economic evaluation of lettuce traceability systems in mitigating foodborne illness risks," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    8. Zhou, Pei & Liu, Yizao, 2023. "Recall information heterogeneity and perceived health risk: The impact of food recall on fresh meat market in the U.S," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    9. Syed Imran Ali Meerza & Khondoker Mottaleb & Alwin Dsouza & Md. Shajedur Rahaman & Md. Abdur Rouf Sarkar, 2023. "Consumers’ valuation of a biofortified crop: Evidence from a laboratory experiment," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 54(5), pages 697-708, September.
    10. Wen Lin & Jiangyuan Liang, 2025. "Regulatory decentralization and food safety: evidence from China," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 107(1), pages 54-80, January.
    11. Xue, Yangchen & Geng, Xianhui & Kiprop, Emmanuel & Hong, Miao, 2021. "How do Spillover Effects Affect Food Safety Management of Companies? Searching New Orientation of Regulations for Food Safety," 2021 ASAE 10th International Conference (Virtual), January 11-13, Beijing, China 329426, Asian Society of Agricultural Economists (ASAE).
    12. Lin, Wen & Ma, Baojie & Liang, Jiangyuan & Jin, Shaosheng, 2024. "Price response to government disclosure of food safety information in developing markets," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I0 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - General
    • I1 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:apecpp:v:41:y:2019:i:3:p:519-541.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.