IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login

Citations for "Social choice theory without the Pareto Principle"

by Wilson, Robert

For a complete description of this item, click here. For a RSS feed for citations of this item, click here.
as in new window

  1. Yasuhito Tanaka, 2005. "A topological approach to the Arrow impossibility theorem when individual preferences are weak orders (forcoming in ``Applied Mathematics and Compuation''(Elsevier))," Public Economics 0506013, EconWPA, revised 16 Jun 2005.
  2. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:4:y:2005:i:13:p:1-6 is not listed on IDEAS
  3. Georges Bordes & Peter J. Hammond & Michel Le Breton, 2005. "Social Welfare Functionals on Restricted Domains and in Economic Environments," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 7(1), pages 1-25, 02.
  4. Dietrich Franz & List Christian, 2007. "The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation," Research Memorandum 022, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
  5. Ning Yu, 2015. "A quest for fundamental theorems of social choice," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 533-548, March.
  6. Campbell, Donald E. & Kelly, Jerry S., 1996. "Continuous-valued social choice," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 195-211.
  7. Nick Baigent & Daniel Eckert, 2004. "Abstract Aggregations and Proximity Preservation: An Impossibility Result," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 359-366, 06.
  8. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/dambferfb7dfprc9m2e02cub3 is not listed on IDEAS
  9. Luc Lauwers, 1999. "Topological Social Choice," Center for Economic Studies - Discussion papers ces9912, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centrum voor Economische Studiën.
  10. Mongin, Philippe, 2012. "The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory," MPRA Paper 37752, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  11. Estelle Cantillon, 2001. "A Graphical Analysis of Some Basic Results in Social Choice," NBER Technical Working Papers 0268, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  12. Juan Candeal, 2013. "Invariance axioms for preferences: applications to social choice theory," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 453-471, September.
  13. Donald Campbell & Jerry Kelly, 2014. "Universally beneficial manipulation: a characterization," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 329-355, August.
  14. Salvador Barberà, 2003. "A Theorem on Preference Aggregation," Working Papers 166, Barcelona Graduate School of Economics.
  15. Antoinette Baujard & Herrade Igersheim, 2007. "Expérimentation du vote par note et du vote par approbation lors de l'élection présidentielle française du 22 avril 2007," Post-Print halshs-00337290, HAL.
  16. Lars Ehlers & John A. Weymark, 2003. "Candidate stability and nonbinary social choice," Economic Theory, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 233-243, 09.
  17. Susumu Cato, 2012. "Social choice without the Pareto principle: a comprehensive analysis," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 869-889, October.
  18. M. Fleurbaey, 2000. "Choix social : une difficulté et de multiples possibilités," THEMA Working Papers 2000-23, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
  19. Campbell, Donald E. & Kelly, Jerry S., 1996. "Trade-offs in the spatial model of resource allocation," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 1-19, April.
  20. Eraslan, H.Hulya & McLennan, Andrew, 2004. "Strategic candidacy for multivalued voting procedures," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 29-54, July.
  21. Miller, Michael K., 2009. "Social choice theory without Pareto: The pivotal voter approach," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 251-255, September.
  22. McMorris, F. R. & Powers, R. C., 2004. "Consensus functions on tree quasi-orders that satisfy an independence condition," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 183-192, September.
  23. Uuganbaatar Ninjbat, 2013. "Approval Voting without Faithfulness," Czech Economic Review, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, vol. 7(1), pages 015-020, March.
  24. Lauwers, Luc & Van Liedekerke, Luc, 1995. "Ultraproducts and aggregation," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 217-237.
  25. Jeffrey Richelson, 1984. "Social choice and the status quo," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 225-234, January.
  26. Herrade Igersheim, 2005. "Extending Xu's results to Arrow''s Impossibility Theorem," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 4(13), pages 1-6.
  27. Mongin, Philippe, 2006. "Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation," Les Cahiers de Recherche 854, HEC Paris.
  28. Hervé Crès & Itzhak Gilboa & Nicolas Vieille, 2012. "Bureaucracy in Quest for Feasibility," Sciences Po publications info:hdl:2441/dambferfb7d, Sciences Po.
  29. Mongin, Philippe & Dietrich, Franz, 2011. "An interpretive account of logical aggregation theory," Les Cahiers de Recherche 941, HEC Paris.
  30. Peris, Josep E. & Sanchez, M. Carmen, 1999. "An oligarchy theorem in fixed agenda without Pareto conditions," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 201-206, February.
  31. Tanaka, Yasuhito, 2009. "On the equivalence of the Arrow impossibility theorem and the Brouwer fixed point theorem when individual preferences are weak orders," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(3-4), pages 241-249, March.
  32. Kevin Roberts, 2005. "Social Choice Theory and the Informational Basis Approach," Economics Papers 2005-W23, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
  33. Ceyhun Coban & Remzi Sanver, 2009. "Social Choice without the Pareto Principle under Weak Independence," Working Papers 201005, Murat Sertel Center for Advanced Economic Studies, Istanbul Bilgi University.
  34. d'Aspremont, Claude & Gevers, Louis, 2002. "Social welfare functionals and interpersonal comparability," Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, in: K. J. Arrow & A. K. Sen & K. Suzumura (ed.), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 10, pages 459-541 Elsevier.
  35. Campbell, Donald E. & Kelly, Jerry S., 1995. "Asymptotic density and social choice trade-offs," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 181-194, June.
  36. Susumu Cato & Yohei Sekiguchi, 2012. "A generalization of Campbell and Kelly’s trade-off theorem," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 237-246, February.
  37. Yasuhito Tanaka, 2003. "A necessary and sufficient condition for Wilson's impossibility theorem with strict non-imposition," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 4(17), pages 1-8.
  38. Tanaka, Yasuhito, 2007. "A topological approach to Wilson's impossibility theorem," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 184-191, February.
  39. Donald E. Campbell & Jerry S. Kelly, 2006. "Social Welfare Functions that Satisfy Pareto, Anonymity, and Neutrality, but not IIA," Working Papers 38, Department of Economics, College of William and Mary.
  40. Elchanan Mossel & Omer Tamuz, 2012. "Complete characterization of functions satisfying the conditions of Arrow’s theorem," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 127-140, June.
  41. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:4:y:2004:i:6:p:1-6 is not listed on IDEAS
  42. Kenryo Indo, 2007. "Proving Arrow’s theorem by PROLOG," Computational Economics, Society for Computational Economics, vol. 30(1), pages 57-63, August.
  43. Daniel Eckert, 2004. "Proximity Preservation in an Anonymous Framework," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 4(6), pages 1-6.
  44. Campbell, Donald E. & Kelly, Jerry S., 1996. "Social choice trade-offs for an arbitrary measure: With application to uncertain or fuzzy agenda," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 99-104, January.
  45. Susumu Cato, 2010. "Brief proofs of Arrovian impossibility theorems," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 267-284, July.
  46. Juan Candeal, 2012. "Subgroup independence conditions on preferences," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 847-853, October.
  47. Elad Dokow & Ron Holzman, 2009. "Aggregation of binary evaluations for truth-functional agendas," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 221-241, February.
  48. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:4:y:2003:i:17:p:1-8 is not listed on IDEAS
  49. Jérémy Picot, 2012. "Random aggregation without the Pareto principle," Review of Economic Design, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, March.
  50. Donald E. Campbell & Jerry S. Kelly, 2006. "Social Welfare Functions that Satisfy Pareto, Anonymity, and Neutrality: Countable Many Alternatives," Working Papers 43, Department of Economics, College of William and Mary.
This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.