IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!)

Citations for "Social choice theory without the Pareto Principle"

by Wilson, Robert

For a complete description of this item, click here. For a RSS feed for citations of this item, click here.
as in new window

  1. d’ASPREMONT, Claude & GEVERS, Louis, 2001. "Social welfare functionals and interpersonal comparability," CORE Discussion Papers 2001040, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
  2. Ceyhun Coban & M. Sanver, 2014. "Social choice without the Pareto principle under weak independence," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 43(4), pages 953-961, December.
  3. Hervé Crès & Itzhak Gilboa & Nicolas Vieille, 2012. "Bureaucracy in Quest for Feasibility," Sciences Po publications info:hdl:2441/dambferfb7d, Sciences Po.
  4. Yasuhito Tanaka, 2005. "A topological approach to the Arrow impossibility theorem when individual preferences are weak orders (forcoming in ``Applied Mathematics and Compuation''(Elsevier))," Public Economics 0506013, EconWPA, revised 16 Jun 2005.
  5. Campbell, Donald E. & Kelly, Jerry S., 2015. "Social choice trade-off results for conditions on triples of alternatives," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 42-45.
  6. Kenryo Indo, 2007. "Proving Arrow’s theorem by PROLOG," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 30(1), pages 57-63, August.
  7. Herrade Igersheim, 2005. "Extending Xu's results to Arrow''s Impossibility Theorem," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 4(13), pages 1-6.
  8. Philippe Mongin & Franz Dietrich, 2011. "An Interpretive Account of Logical Aggregation Theory," Working Papers hal-00579343, HAL.
  9. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:4:y:2005:i:13:p:1-6 is not listed on IDEAS
  10. Yasuhito Tanaka, 2003. "A necessary and sufficient condition for Wilson's impossibility theorem with strict non-imposition," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 4(17), pages 1-8.
  11. Elchanan Mossel & Omer Tamuz, 2012. "Complete characterization of functions satisfying the conditions of Arrow’s theorem," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 39(1), pages 127-140, June.
  12. Philippe Mongin, 2012. "The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 315-355, September.
  13. Campbell, Donald E. & Kelly, Jerry S., 1996. "Continuous-valued social choice," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 195-211.
  14. Peris, Josep E. & Sanchez, M. Carmen, 1999. "An oligarchy theorem in fixed agenda without Pareto conditions," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 201-206, February.
  15. Marc Fleurbaey, 2000. "Choix social : une difficulté et de multiples possibilités," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 51(5), pages 1215-1232.
  16. Donald E. Campbell & Jerry S. Kelly, 2006. "Social Welfare Functions that Satisfy Pareto, Anonymity, and Neutrality: Countable Many Alternatives," Working Papers 43, Department of Economics, College of William and Mary.
  17. Georges Bordes & Peter J. Hammond & Michel Le Breton, 1997. "Social Welfare Functionals on Restricted Domains and in Economic Environments," Working Papers 97023, Stanford University, Department of Economics.
  18. Juan Candeal, 2012. "Subgroup independence conditions on preferences," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 39(4), pages 847-853, October.
  19. Jérémy Picot, 2012. "Random aggregation without the Pareto principle," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, March.
  20. Campbell, Donald E. & Kelly, Jerry S., 1995. "Asymptotic density and social choice trade-offs," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 181-194, June.
  21. Lauwers, Luc, 2000. "Topological social choice," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 1-39, July.
  22. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2010. "The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 281-299, March.
  23. Antoinette Baujard & Herrade Igersheim, 2007. "Expérimentation du vote par note et du vote par approbation lors de l'élection présidentielle française du 22 avril 2007," Post-Print halshs-00337290, HAL.
  24. Donald Campbell & Jerry Kelly, 2014. "Universally beneficial manipulation: a characterization," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 43(2), pages 329-355, August.
  25. Uuganbaatar Ninjbat, 2015. "Impossibility theorems are modified and unified," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 45(4), pages 849-866, December.
  26. Salvador Barberà, 2003. "A Theorem on Preference Aggregation," UFAE and IAE Working Papers 601.03, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).
  27. Lauwers, Luc & Van Liedekerke, Luc, 1995. "Ultraproducts and aggregation," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 217-237.
  28. Susumu Cato, 2012. "Social choice without the Pareto principle: a comprehensive analysis," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 39(4), pages 869-889, October.
  29. Sholomov, Lev A., 2000. "Explicit form of neutral social decision rules for basic rationality conditions," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 81-107, January.
  30. Ning Yu, 2015. "A quest for fundamental theorems of social choice," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 44(3), pages 533-548, March.
  31. Campbell, Donald E. & Kelly, Jerry S., 1996. "Social choice trade-offs for an arbitrary measure: With application to uncertain or fuzzy agenda," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 99-104, January.
  32. Daniel Eckert, 2004. "Proximity Preservation in an Anonymous Framework," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 4(6), pages 1-6.
  33. Donald E. Campbell & Jerry S. Kelly, 2006. "Social Welfare Functions that Satisfy Pareto, Anonymity, and Neutrality, but not IIA," Working Papers 38, Department of Economics, College of William and Mary.
  34. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:4:y:2003:i:17:p:1-8 is not listed on IDEAS
  35. Jeffrey Richelson, 1984. "Social choice and the status quo," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 225-234, January.
  36. Philippe Mongin, 2005. "Factoring Out the Impossibility of Logical Aggregation," Working Papers hal-00243010, HAL.
  37. Estelle Cantillon & Antonio Rangel, 2002. "A graphical analysis of some basic results in social choice," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/9007, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
  38. Susumu Cato & Yohei Sekiguchi, 2012. "A generalization of Campbell and Kelly’s trade-off theorem," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 38(2), pages 237-246, February.
  39. McMorris, F. R. & Powers, R. C., 2004. "Consensus functions on tree quasi-orders that satisfy an independence condition," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 183-192, September.
  40. Tanaka, Yasuhito, 2007. "A topological approach to Wilson's impossibility theorem," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 184-191, February.
  41. Susumu Cato, 2016. "Weak independence and the Pareto principle," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 47(2), pages 295-314, August.
  42. EHLERS, Lars & WEYMARK, John A., 2001. "Candidate Stability and Nonbinary Social Choice," Cahiers de recherche 2001-30, Universite de Montreal, Departement de sciences economiques.
  43. Elad Dokow & Ron Holzman, 2009. "Aggregation of binary evaluations for truth-functional agendas," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 32(2), pages 221-241, February.
  44. Kotaro Suzumura, 2002. "Introduction to social choice and welfare," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 442, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
  45. Tanaka, Yasuhito, 2009. "On the equivalence of the Arrow impossibility theorem and the Brouwer fixed point theorem when individual preferences are weak orders," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(3-4), pages 241-249, March.
  46. Campbell, Donald E. & Kelly, Jerry S., 1996. "Trade-offs in the spatial model of resource allocation," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 1-19, April.
  47. Uuganbaatar Ninjbat, 2013. "Approval Voting without Faithfulness," Czech Economic Review, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, vol. 7(1), pages 015-020, March.
  48. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:4:y:2004:i:6:p:1-6 is not listed on IDEAS
  49. Miller, Michael K., 2009. "Social choice theory without Pareto: The pivotal voter approach," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 251-255, September.
  50. Kevin Roberts, 2005. "Social Choice Theory and the Informational Basis Approach," Economics Papers 2005-W23, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
  51. Susumu Cato, 2010. "Brief proofs of Arrovian impossibility theorems," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 35(2), pages 267-284, July.
  52. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/dambferfb7dfprc9m2e02cub3 is not listed on IDEAS
  53. Eraslan, H.Hulya & McLennan, Andrew, 2004. "Strategic candidacy for multivalued voting procedures," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 29-54, July.
  54. Juan Candeal, 2013. "Invariance axioms for preferences: applications to social choice theory," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 41(3), pages 453-471, September.
  55. Elizabeth Maggie Penn, 2015. "Arrow’s Theorem and its descendants," Chapters, in: Handbook of Social Choice and Voting, chapter 14, pages 237-262 Edward Elgar Publishing.
  56. Nick Baigent & Daniel Eckert, 2004. "Abstract Aggregations and Proximity Preservation: An Impossibility Result," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 359-366, 06.
This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.