College Admission and High School Integration
Download full text from publisher
Other versions of this item:
- Fernanda Estevan & Thomas Gall & Patrick Legros & Andrew Newman, 2017. "College Admission and High School Integration," Working Papers 2017-022, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
- Fernanda Estevan & Thomas Gall; Patrick Legros; Andrew F. Newman, 2014. "College Admission and High School Integration," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2014_26, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
- Estevan, Fernanda & Gall, Thomas & Legros, Patrick & Newman, Andrew, 2017. "College Admission and High School Integration," CEPR Discussion Papers 11910, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
References listed on IDEAS
- Robert Bifulco & Jason M. Fletcher & Stephen L. Ross, 2011. "The Effect of Classmate Characteristics on Post-secondary Outcomes: Evidence from the Add Health," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 3(1), pages 25-53, February.
- Ruiz-Castillo, Javier & Mora, Ricardo, 2007. "The invariance properties of the Mutual Information index of multigroup segregation," UC3M Working papers. Economics we077544, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
- Legros, Patrick & Newman, Andrew, 2010. "Co-ranking mates: Assortative matching in marriage markets," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 106(3), pages 177-179, March.
- Patrick Legros & Andrew F. Newman, 2007.
"Beauty Is a Beast, Frog Is a Prince: Assortative Matching with Nontransferabilities,"
Econometric Society, vol. 75(4), pages 1073-1102, July.
- Patrick Legros & Andrew F. Newman, 2002. "Beauty is a Beast, Frog is a Prince: Assortative Matching with Nontransferabilities," Boston University - Department of Economics - The Institute for Economic Development Working Papers Series dp-149, Boston University - Department of Economics, revised Nov 2004.
- Patrick Legros & Andrew F. Newman, 2003. "Beauty is a Beast, Frog is a Prince: Assortative Matching with Nontransferabilities," Economics Working Papers 0030, Institute for Advanced Study, School of Social Science.
- Ettore Damiano & Hao Li & Wing Suen, 2010.
"First In Village Or Second In Rome?,"
International Economic Review,
Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 51(1), pages 263-288, February.
- Ettore Damiano & Hao Li & Wing Suen, 2004. "First in Village or Second in Rome," Working Papers tecipa-221, University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
- Damiano, Ettore & Li, Hao & Suen, Wing, 2005. "First in village or second in Rome?," Microeconomics.ca working papers damiano-05-01-25-10-14-13, Vancouver School of Economics, revised 26 Jan 2005.
- Stinebrickner, Ralph & Stinebrickner, Todd R., 2006.
"What can be learned about peer effects using college roommates? Evidence from new survey data and students from disadvantaged backgrounds,"
Journal of Public Economics,
Elsevier, vol. 90(8-9), pages 1435-1454, September.
- Todd R. Stinebrickner & Ralph Stinebrickner, 2005. "What Can Be Learned About Peer Effects Using College Roommates? Evidence From New Survey Data and Students from Disadvantaged Backgrounds," University of Western Ontario, Centre for Human Capital and Productivity (CHCP) Working Papers 20054, University of Western Ontario, Centre for Human Capital and Productivity (CHCP).
- Kalena E. Cortes & Andrew I. Friedson, 2014.
"Ranking Up by Moving Out: The Effect of the Texas Top 10% Plan on Property Values,"
National Tax Journal,
National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 67(1), pages 51-76, March.
- Cortes, Kalena E. & Friedson, Andrew I., 2010. "Ranking Up by Moving Out: The Effect of the Texas Top 10% Plan on Property Values," IZA Discussion Papers 5026, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
- Cullen, Julie Berry & Long, Mark C. & Reback, Randall, 2013.
"Jockeying for position: Strategic high school choice under Texas' top ten percent plan,"
Journal of Public Economics,
Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 32-48.
- Julie Berry Cullen & Mark C. Long & Randall Reback, 2011. "Jockeying for Position: Strategic High School Choice Under Texas' Top Ten Percent Plan," NBER Working Papers 16663, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Michael Kremer & Dan Levy, 2008. "Peer Effects and Alcohol Use among College Students," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 22(3), pages 189-206, Summer.
CitationsCitations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- De Fraja, Gianni & Martínez-Mora, Francisco, 2014.
"The desegregating effect of school tracking,"
Journal of Urban Economics,
Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 164-177.
- Francisco Martínez-Mora & Gianni De Fraja, 2012. "The desegregating effect of school tracking," Discussion Papers in Economics 12/24, Department of Economics, University of Leicester.
- De Fraja, Gianni & Martinez Mora, Francisco, 2012. "The desegregating effect of school tracking," CEPR Discussion Papers 9204, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Caterina Calsamiglia & Annalisa Loviglio, 2017. "Grading on a Curve: When Having Good Peers is not Good," Working Papers wp2018_1704, CEMFI.
- Caterina Calsamiglia & Annalisa Loviglio, 2016.
"Grading On A Curve: When Having Good Peers Is Not Good,"
940, Barcelona Graduate School of Economics.
- Caterina Calsamiglia & Annalisa Loviglio, 2017. "Grading on a Curve: When Having Good Peers is not Good," Working Papers wp2017_1704, CEMFI.
- Caterina Calsamiglia & Annalisa Loviglio, 2016. "Grading On A Curve: When Having Good Peers Is Not Good," Working Papers 2016-020, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
- Thomas Gall & Patrick Legros & Andrew Newman, 2015. "College Diversity and Investment Incentives," Working Papers 2015-001, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
More about this item
Keywordsmatching; affirmative action; education; college admission; high School desegregation; texas top ten percent;
- C78 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Bargaining Theory; Matching Theory
- I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions
- D45 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Rationing; Licensing
- J78 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Discrimination - - - Public Policy (including comparable worth)
NEP fieldsThis paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2017-05-21 (All new papers)
- NEP-EDU-2017-05-21 (Education)
- NEP-URE-2017-05-21 (Urban & Real Estate Economics)
StatisticsAccess and download statistics
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eca:wpaper:2013/251329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Benoit Pauwels). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/arulbbe.html .
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.