IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/gadadp/260820.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Langfristige Rohstoffsicherung in der Supply Chain Biogas: Status Quo und Potenziale vertraglicher Zusammenarbeit

Author

Listed:
  • Granoszewski, Karol
  • Spiller, Achim

Abstract

Im Zuge des Ausbaus der Biogaserzeugung steigt die Nachfrage nach landwirtschaftlicher Biomasse. Besonders die vermehrt auf den Biogasmarkt tretenden außerlandwirtschaftlichen Biogasbetreiber stehen vor der Herausforderung, ihren Substratbedarf abzusichern. Eine Ana- lyse der Struktur und Entwicklungen entlang der Supply Chain Biogas verdeutlicht die Notwendigkeit zur vertraglichen Zusammenarbeit als Form der koordinierten Rohstoffbe- schaffung. Da Biomasseabnehmer i. d. R. nur über wenige Erfahrungen mit Landwirten als Vertragspartnern verfügen, wurden sowohl deren generelle vertragliche Einstellungen als auch deren spezielle Präferenzen hinsichtlich konkreter Inhalte von Biomasselieferverträgen analysiert. Eine Befragung von 209 landwirtschaftlichen Betriebsleitern gibt über beides Auf- schluss. Landwirte beurteilen vertragliche Kooperationen infolge differenzierter Freiheits- und Risikopräferenz unterschiedlich. Vertragslieferanten zeichnen sich durch eine geringe Freiheitspräferenz, hohe Risikoaversion und vertikale Orientierung aus. Hinsichtlich der Vertragsinhalte favorisieren sie überwiegend kurzfristige Verträge mit marktorientierter Preisanpassung. Für potenzielle Biomasseerzeuger sind neben einem hohen Preisniveau ferner die landwirtschaftliche und regionale Orientierung des Abnehmers bei Vertragsüberlegungen relevant. Es werden sowohl theoretische Implikationen als auch Empfehlungen hinsichtlich der Akquise von Biomasselieferanten und der Ausgestaltung von Vertragsangeboten gegeben.

Suggested Citation

  • Granoszewski, Karol & Spiller, Achim, 2013. "Langfristige Rohstoffsicherung in der Supply Chain Biogas: Status Quo und Potenziale vertraglicher Zusammenarbeit," Department of Agricultural and Rural Development (DARE) Discussion Papers 260820, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:gadadp:260820
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/260820/files/Granoszewski_Spiller_2013__Diskussionsbeitrag_Biomasseliefervertr%C3%A4ge_FINAL.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/260820/files/Granoszewski_Spiller_2013__Diskussionsbeitrag_Biomasseliefervertr%C3%A4ge_FINAL.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francis M. Epplin & Christopher D. Clark & Roland K. Roberts & Seonghuyk Hwang, 2007. "Challenges to the Development of a Dedicated Energy Crop," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 89(5), pages 1296-1302.
    2. Ernst Fehr & Alexander Klein & Klaus M Schmidt, 2007. "Fairness and Contract Design," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 75(1), pages 121-154, January.
    3. Furesi, Roberto & Martino, Gaetano & Pulina, Pietro, 2006. "Contractual Choice and Food Safety Strategy: Some Empirical Findings in Italian Poultry Sector," 99th Seminar, February 8-10, 2006, Bonn, Germany 7715, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Key, Nigel D. & MacDonald, James M., 2006. "Agricultural Contracting Trading Autonomy for Risk Reduction," Amber Waves:The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, pages 1-6, February.
    5. Hrabrin BACHEV, 2010. "Framework For Analisis Of Agrarian Contracts," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2(1), pages 39-66, March.
    6. Lunnan, Anders, 1997. "Agriculture-based biomass energy supply -- a survey of economic issues," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 573-582, May.
    7. repec:ags:agsaem:259070 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Nigel Key & William McBride, 2003. "Production Contracts and Productivity in the U.S. Hog Sector," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 85(1), pages 121-133.
    9. Gillespie, Jeffrey M. & Eidman, Vernon R., 1998. "The Effect of Risk and Autonomy on Independent Hog Producers' Contracting Decisions," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(01), pages 175-188, July.
    10. Stephanie Schlecht & Achim Spiller, 2012. "A Latent Class Cluster Analysis of Farmers’ Attitudes Towards Contract Design in the Dairy Industry," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(2), pages 121-134, March.
    11. World Bank, 2005. "The Dynamics of Vertical Coordination in Agrifood Chains in Eastern Europe and Central Asia : Implications for Policy and World Bank Operations," World Bank Other Operational Studies 8806, The World Bank.
    12. repec:ags:gjagec:145218 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Ueckermann, E.M. & Blignaut, J.N. & Gupta, Rangan & Raubenheimer, J., 2008. "Modelling South African grain farmers’ preferences to adopt derivative contracts using discrete choice models," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 0(Issue 2), pages 1-18, June.
    14. Chris Boessen & Joe Parcell & Jason Franken & John Lawrence & Ron Plain & Glenn Grimes, 2010. "Producer perceptions and attitudes toward hog marketing contracts," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(3), pages 405-424.
    15. Joost M.E. Pennings & Raymond M. Leuthold, 2000. "The Role of Farmers' Behavioral Attitudes and Heterogeneity in Futures Contracts Usage," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 82(4), pages 908-919.
    16. Martinez, Stephen W., 2002. "Vertical Coordination Of Marketing Systems: Lessons From The Poultry, Egg, And Pork Industries," Agricultural Economics Reports 34051, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    17. Silke Boger, 2001. "Quality and contractual choice: a transaction cost approach to the polish hog market," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics, vol. 28(3), pages 241-262, October.
    18. Harvey S. James Jr. & Michael E. Sykuta, 2006. "Farmer trust in producer- and investor-owned firms: Evidence from Missouri corn and soybean producers," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(1), pages 135-153.
    19. repec:oup:revage:v:29:y:2007:i:2:p:331-348. is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Nigel Key, 2005. "How much do farmers value their independence?," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 33(1), pages 117-126, July.
    21. Altman, Ira J. & Boessen, Chris & Sanders, Dwight, 2008. "Contracting for Biomass: Supply Chain Strategies for Renewable Energy," Journal of the ASFMRA, American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, vol. 2008, pages 1-7.
    22. Lajili, Kaouthar & Barry, Peter J. & Sonka, Steven T. & Mahoney, Joseph T., 1997. "Farmers' Preferences For Crop Contracts," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 0(Number 2), pages 1-17, December.
    23. Christopher G. Davis & Jeffrey M. Gillespie, 2007. "Factors Affecting the Selection of Business Arrangements by U.S. Hog Farmers," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 29(2), pages 331-348.
    24. Altman, Ira J. & Sanders, Dwight R. & Boessen, Christian R., 2007. "Applying Transaction Cost Economics: A Note on Biomass Supply Chains," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 0(Number 1), pages 1-8.
    25. Brian Roe & Thomas L. Sporleder & Betsy Belleville, 2004. "Hog Producer Preferences for Marketing Contract Attributes," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 86(1), pages 115-123.
    26. Dautzenberg, Kirsti & Hanf, Jon, 2008. "Biofuel chain development in Germany: Organisation, opportunities, and challenges," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 485-489, January.
    27. Ani L. Katchova & Mario J. Miranda, 2004. "Two-Step Econometric Estimation of Farm Characteristics Affecting Marketing Contract Decisions," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 86(1), pages 88-102.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Crop Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gadadp:260820. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/iagoede.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.