IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Demand Interrelationships of At-Home Nonalcoholic Beverage Consumption in the United States

Listed author(s):
  • Dharmasena, Senarath
  • Capps, Oral, Jr.
Registered author(s):

    In this study we modeled demand interrelationships of at-home nonalcoholic beverage consumption in the United States using a unique data set developed using Nielsen HomeScan panel data of household purchases of nonalcoholic beverages over the period January 1998 through December 2003. We used 72 monthly observations of expenditure shares, real prices and real per capita expenditures of 10 unique categories of nonalcoholic beverages in a full-blown AIDS model with an adjustment for seasonal (quarterly) variability in data. Compared to similar studies done in the past, our study used a rich delineation of nonalcoholic beverage categories, and in particular introduced isotonics for the first time. Furthermore, our study provided more information about important sub categories of nonalcoholic beverages, such as, regular and diet soft drink partition to soft drink category, high-fat and low-fat partition to milk category, and fruit drinks and fruit juices partition in fruit beverages category. It also separated the effects of tea and coffee, unlike past studies in the literature where both tea and coffee were analyzed as a single category. Estimated own-price elasticities were theoretically consistent sign-wise (negative sign) and majority of compensated cross-price elasticities revealed that most of (60%) of nonalcoholic beverages were net substitutes. We found that isotonics were the most price and expenditure elastic nonalcoholic beverage and it is followed by regular soft drinks. Furthermore, milk was found to be net complements with fruit drinks, fruit juices, water, and tea. Additionally, diet and regular soft drinks were also net complements. Fruit juice and fruit drinks were found to be net substitutes. Our study further showed that high-fat milk was a net substitute for low-fat milk.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Agricultural and Applied Economics Association in its series 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin with number 49443.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 2009
    Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea09:49443
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    555 East Wells Street, Suite 1100, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202

    Phone: (414) 918-3190
    Fax: (414) 276-3349
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Ueda, Takeshi & Frechette, Darren L., 2002. "Have Milk Fat Preferences Shifted? Structural Analysis of New York Milk Consumption," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 31(1), April.
    2. Dharmasena, Senarath & Capps, Oral, Jr. & Clauson, Annette L., 2009. "Nutritional Contributions of Nonalcoholic Beverages to the U.S. Diet: 1998-2003," 2009 Annual Meeting, January 31-February 3, 2009, Atlanta, Georgia 46386, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    3. Steven T. Yen & Biing-Hwan Lin & David M. Smallwood & Margaret Andrews, 2004. "Demand for nonalcoholic beverages: The case of low-income households," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(3), pages 309-321.
    4. Gould, Brian W. & Cox, Thomas L. & Perali, Carlo Federico, 1990. "The Demand For Fluid Milk Products In The U.S.: A Demand Systems Approach," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 15(01), July.
    5. Ueda, Takeshi & Frechette, Darren L., 2002. "Have Milk Fat Preferences Shifted? Structural Analysis of New York Milk Consumption," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(01), pages 71-83, April.
    6. Gould, Brian W., 1996. "Factors Affecting U.S. Demand For Reduced-Fat Fluid Milk," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 21(01), July.
    7. Rickertsen, Kyrre, 1998. "The demand for food and beverages in Norway," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 89-100, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea09:49443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.