IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pma2436.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Trey Malone

Personal Details

First Name:Trey
Middle Name:
Last Name:Malone
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pma2436
http://treymalone.com
Twitter: @treymalone3
Terminal Degree:2017 Department of Agricultural Economics; Oklahoma State University (from RePEc Genealogy)

Affiliation

Department of Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics
College of Agriculture and Natural Resources
Michigan State University

East Lansing, Michigan (United States)
http://www.afre.msu.edu/

(517) 355-4563
(517) 432-1800
Justin S. Morrill Hall of Agriculture, 446 West Circle Dr., Rm 202, East Lansing, MI 48824-1039
RePEc:edi:damsuus (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Lagoudakis, Angelos & Behe, Bridget & Malone, Trey, 2019. "Market Segments in the Fresh Balaton Tart Cherry Market in Michigan," Staff Paper Series 287681, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
  2. Malone, Trey & Melstrom, Richard T., 2018. "Where's the beef? Cattle Producers' Response to Endangered Species Regulations," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274404, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  3. Trey Malone & Joshua C. Hall, 2016. "Can Liberalization of Local Food Marketing Channels Influence Local Economies? A Case Study of West Virginia’s Craft Beer Distribution Laws," Working Papers 16-22, Department of Economics, West Virginia University.
  4. Malone, Trey & Lusk, Jayson L., 2015. "How Markets Alleviate the Excessive Choice Effect: A Field Experiment on Craft Beer Choice," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205965, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

Articles

  1. Trey Malone & Antonios M. Koumpias & Per L. Bylund, 2019. "Entrepreneurial response to interstate regulatory competition: evidence from a behavioral discrete choice experiment," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 172-192, April.
  2. Malone, Trey & Lusk, Jayson L., 2019. "Mitigating Choice Overload: An Experiment in the U.S. Beer Market," Journal of Wine Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(1), pages 48-70, February.
  3. Trey Malone & Jayson L. Lusk, 2019. "Releasing The Trap: A Method To Reduce Inattention Bias In Survey Data With Application To U.S. Beer Taxes," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 57(1), pages 584-599, January.
  4. Trey Malone & Jayson L. Lusk, 2018. "An instrumental variable approach to distinguishing perceptions from preferences for beer brands," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(4), pages 403-417, June.
  5. Trey Malone & Jayson L Lusk, 2018. "A simple diagnostic measure of inattention bias in discrete choice models," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics, vol. 45(3), pages 455-462.
  6. Trey Malone & Jayson L. Lusk, 2018. "If you brew it, who will come? Market segments in the U.S. beer market," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 204-221, March.
  7. Malone, Trey & Lusk, Jayson L., 2018. "Consequences of Participant Inattention with an Application to Carbon Taxes for Meat Products," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 218-230.
  8. McFadden, Brandon R. & Malone, Trey, 2018. "How will mandatory labeling of genetically modified food nudge consumer decision-making?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 186-194.
  9. Malone, Trey & Lusk, Jayson L., 2017. "Taste Trumps Health And Safety: Incorporating Consumer Perceptions Into A Discrete Choice Experiment For Meat," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(1), pages 139-157, February.
  10. Malone, Trey & Stack, Martin, 2017. "What Do Beer Laws Mean for Economic Growth?," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 32(3), September.
  11. Malone, Trey & Lusk, Jayson L., 2017. "The excessive choice effect meets the market: A field experiment on craft beer choice," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 8-13.
  12. Trey Malone & Dustin Chambers, 2017. "Quantifying Federal Regulatory Burdens in the Beer Value Chain," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(3), pages 466-471, June.
  13. Trey Malone & Josh Hall, 2017. "Can liberalization of local food marketing channels influence local economies? A case study of West Virginia’s craft beer distribution laws," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 6(2), pages 54-58.
  14. Malone, Trey & Lusk, Jayson L., 2016. "Putting the Chicken Before the Egg Price: An Ex Post Analysis of California's Battery Cage Ban," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 41(3), pages 1-15, September.
  15. Trey Malone & Jayson L. Lusk, 2016. "Brewing up entrepreneurship: government intervention in beer," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 5(3), pages 325-342, November.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

    Sorry, no citations of working papers recorded.

Articles

  1. Trey Malone & Antonios M. Koumpias & Per L. Bylund, 2019. "Entrepreneurial response to interstate regulatory competition: evidence from a behavioral discrete choice experiment," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 172-192, April.

    Cited by:

    1. Wittberg, Emanuel & Erlingsson, Gissur, 2020. "Do Corrupt Local Governments Inhibit Entrepreneurship? A Contextual Analysis of Start-Ups in Swedish Municipalities," Working Paper Series 1323, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.

  2. Trey Malone & Jayson L. Lusk, 2019. "Releasing The Trap: A Method To Reduce Inattention Bias In Survey Data With Application To U.S. Beer Taxes," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 57(1), pages 584-599, January.

    Cited by:

    1. Vecchio, Riccardo & Caso, Gerarda & Cembalo, Luigi & Borrello, Massimiliano, 2020. "Is respondents’ inattention in online surveys a major issue for research?," Economia agro-alimentare / Food Economy, Italian Society of Agri-food Economics/Società Italiana di Economia Agro-Alimentare (SIEA), vol. 22(1), March.
    2. Tavárez, Héctor & Elbakidze, Levan, 2019. "Valuing recreational enhancements in the San Patricio Urban Forest of Puerto Rico: A choice experiment approach," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    3. Dan Rigby & Caroline Vass & Katherine Payne, 2020. "Opening the ‘Black Box’: An Overview of Methods to Investigate the Decision-Making Process in Choice-Based Surveys," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 13(1), pages 31-41, February.
    4. Canavari, Maurizio & Drichoutis, Andreas C. & Lusk, Jayson L. & Nayga, Rodolfo, 2018. "How to run an experimental auction: A review of recent advances," MPRA Paper 89715, University Library of Munich, Germany.

  3. Trey Malone & Jayson L. Lusk, 2018. "An instrumental variable approach to distinguishing perceptions from preferences for beer brands," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(4), pages 403-417, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Aaron J. Staples & Carson J. Reeling & Nicole J. Olynk Widmar & Jayson L. Lusk, 2020. "Consumer willingness to pay for sustainability attributes in beer: A choice experiment using eco‐labels," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(4), pages 591-612, October.
    2. Trey Malone & Antonios M. Koumpias & Per L. Bylund, 2019. "Entrepreneurial response to interstate regulatory competition: evidence from a behavioral discrete choice experiment," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 172-192, April.
    3. Trey Malone & F. Bailey Norwood, 2020. "Gluten aversion is not limited to the political left," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 37(1), pages 1-15, March.
    4. Costanigro, Marco & Onozaka, Yuko, 2018. "A Belief-Preference Model of Choice for Experience and Credence Goods," Working Papers 276053, Colorado State University, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    5. Irani-Kermani, Roozbeh & Jaenicke, Edward C., 2018. "Generalizing Variety Seeking Measurement from Brand Space to Product Attribute Space," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 273818, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

  4. Trey Malone & Jayson L. Lusk, 2018. "If you brew it, who will come? Market segments in the U.S. beer market," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 204-221, March.

    Cited by:

    1. Aaron J. Staples & Carson J. Reeling & Nicole J. Olynk Widmar & Jayson L. Lusk, 2020. "Consumer willingness to pay for sustainability attributes in beer: A choice experiment using eco‐labels," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(4), pages 591-612, October.

  5. Malone, Trey & Lusk, Jayson L., 2018. "Consequences of Participant Inattention with an Application to Carbon Taxes for Meat Products," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 218-230.

    Cited by:

    1. Trey Malone & Antonios M. Koumpias & Per L. Bylund, 2019. "Entrepreneurial response to interstate regulatory competition: evidence from a behavioral discrete choice experiment," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 172-192, April.
    2. Vecchio, Riccardo & Caso, Gerarda & Cembalo, Luigi & Borrello, Massimiliano, 2020. "Is respondents’ inattention in online surveys a major issue for research?," Economia agro-alimentare / Food Economy, Italian Society of Agri-food Economics/Società Italiana di Economia Agro-Alimentare (SIEA), vol. 22(1), March.
    3. Daniel E. Chavez & Marco A. Palma & Rodolfo M. Nayga Jr., "undated". "When Does Real Become Consequential in Non-hypothetical Choice Experiments?," Working Papers 20190306-001, Texas A&M University, Department of Economics.
    4. Tavárez, Héctor & Elbakidze, Levan, 2019. "Valuing recreational enhancements in the San Patricio Urban Forest of Puerto Rico: A choice experiment approach," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    5. Lew, Daniel K., 2018. "Discounting future payments in stated preference choice experiments," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 150-164.
    6. Jayson L Lusk, 2019. "Consumer beliefs about healthy foods and diets," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-15, October.
    7. Erlend Dancke Sandorf, 2019. "Did You Miss Something? Inattentive Respondents in Discrete Choice Experiments," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 73(4), pages 1197-1235, August.
    8. Lusk, Jayson L., 2019. "Income and (Ir) rational food choice," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 630-645.
    9. Erdem, Seda, 2018. "Who do UK consumers trust for information about nanotechnology?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 133-142.
    10. Hopkins, Kelsey A. & McKendree, Melissa G. S., 2020. "Do Ewe See what I See? Evidence of Conspicuous Consumption for Sustainably Labeled Wool Clothing," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304616, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

  6. Malone, Trey & Lusk, Jayson L., 2017. "Taste Trumps Health And Safety: Incorporating Consumer Perceptions Into A Discrete Choice Experiment For Meat," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(1), pages 139-157, February.

    Cited by:

    1. Trey Malone & Antonios M. Koumpias & Per L. Bylund, 2019. "Entrepreneurial response to interstate regulatory competition: evidence from a behavioral discrete choice experiment," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 172-192, April.
    2. Costanigro, Marco & Scozzafava, Gabriele & Casini, Leonardo, 2019. "Vertical differentiation via multi-tier geographical indications and the consumer perception of quality: The case of Chianti wines," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 246-259.
    3. Costanigro, Marco & Onozaka, Yuko, 2018. "A Belief-Preference Model of Choice for Experience and Credence Goods," Working Papers 276053, Colorado State University, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    4. Zhai, Qianqian & Kassas, Bachir & Zhao, Shuoli & Chen, Lijun & Chen, Chao, 2020. "Investigating Preference Inconsistencies in Incentive Structures that Account for House Money Effects," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304584, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Roe, Brian E. & Interis, Matthew G. & Howard, Gregory E., 2018. "Utilizing Subjective Beliefs in Stated Preference Models: Issues and Solutions," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274017, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Elizabeth S. Byrd & Nicole J. Olynk Widmar & Benjamin M. Gramig, 2018. "Presentation matters: Number of attributes presented impacts estimated preferences," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 377-389, March.
    7. Neill, Clinton L. & Holcomb, Rodney B., 2019. "Does a food safety label matter? Consumer heterogeneity and fresh produce risk perceptions under the Food Safety Modernization Act," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 7-14.
    8. Biancamaria Torquati & Tiziano Tempesta & Daniel Vecchiato & Sonia Venanzi, 2018. "Tasty or Sustainable? The Effect of Product Sensory Experience on a Sustainable New Food Product: An Application of Discrete Choice Experiments on Chianina Tinned Beef," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 10(8), pages 1-24, August.

  7. Malone, Trey & Lusk, Jayson L., 2017. "The excessive choice effect meets the market: A field experiment on craft beer choice," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 8-13.

    Cited by:

    1. Trey Malone & Jayson L. Lusk, 2018. "If you brew it, who will come? Market segments in the U.S. beer market," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 204-221, March.
    2. Bazzani, Claudia & Nayga, Rodolfo M. & Ha, Kim & Atallah, Shadi S., 2017. "Willpower Depletion: Can it Influence Responses and Attribute Non-Attendance in Choice Experiments?," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258261, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

  8. Trey Malone & Dustin Chambers, 2017. "Quantifying Federal Regulatory Burdens in the Beer Value Chain," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(3), pages 466-471, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Trey Malone & Jayson L. Lusk, 2018. "If you brew it, who will come? Market segments in the U.S. beer market," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 204-221, March.
    2. Howard, Philip H., 2018. "Craftwashing in the U.S. Beer Industry," EconStor Open Access Articles, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 1-13.
    3. Yongtong Shao & Minghao Li & Dermot J. Hayes & Wendong Zhang & Tao Xiong & Wei Xie, 2020. "China's Missing Pigs: Correcting China's Hog Inventory Data Using a Machine Learning Approach," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 20-wp607, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.

  9. Malone, Trey & Lusk, Jayson L., 2016. "Putting the Chicken Before the Egg Price: An Ex Post Analysis of California's Battery Cage Ban," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 41(3), pages 1-15, September.

    Cited by:

    1. Nathan Pelletier & Maurice Doyon & Bruce Muirhead & Tina Widowski & Jodey Nurse-Gupta & Michelle Hunniford, 2018. "Sustainability in the Canadian Egg Industry—Learning from the Past, Navigating the Present, Planning for the Future," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Sohae Eve Oh & Tomislav Vukina, 2018. "Substitutability between organic and conventional poultry products and organic price premiums," ECONOMIA AGRO-ALIMENTARE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 20(1), pages 75-92.
    3. Stone, Janine & Costanigro, Marco & Goemans, Christopher, 2018. "Public Opinion on ColoradoWater Rights Transfers: Are Policy Preferences Consistent with Concerns over Impacts?," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 43(3), September.
    4. Conner Mullally & Jayson L Lusk, 2018. "The Impact of Farm Animal Housing Restrictions on Egg Prices, Consumer Welfare, and Production in California," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 100(3), pages 649-669.
    5. Brorsen, B. Wade, 2017. "2016 WAEA Presidential Address: Comments on Agricultural Economics Research," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 42(1), pages 1-9, January.
    6. Christina Biedny & Trey Malone & Jayson L. Lusk, 2020. "Exploring Polarization in US Food Policy Opinions," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(3), pages 434-454, September.
    7. Kent D. Messer & Marco Costanigro & Harry M. Kaiser, 2017. "Labeling Food Processes: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 39(3), pages 407-427.
    8. Paul, Andrew S. & Lusk, Jayson L. & Norwood, F. Bailey & Tonsor, Glynn T., 2019. "An experiment on the vote-buy gap with application to cage-free eggs," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 102-109.
    9. Treich, Nicolas, 2019. "Veganomics : Vers une Approche Economique du Véganisme ?," TSE Working Papers 19-988, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    10. Hopkins, Kelsey A. & McKendree, Melissa G. S. & Rice, Emma D., 2020. "Understanding the U.S. Publics’ Voting on Animal Welfare and Genetically Modified Organism Labeling Ballot Initiatives," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304519, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    11. Ochs, Dan & Wolf, Christopher A. & Widmar, Nicole Olynk & Bir, Courtney & Lai, John, 2019. "Hen housing system information effects on U.S. egg demand," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 1-1.
    12. Jayson L. Lusk, 2019. "Consumer preferences for cage‐free eggs and impacts of retailer pledges," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(2), pages 129-148, April.
    13. Marco J. W. Kotschedoff & Max J. Pachali, 2020. "Higher Minimum Quality Standards and Redistributive Effects on Consumer Welfare," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(1), pages 253-280, January.
    14. Keller, Andrew & Boland, Michael & Çakır, Metin, 2020. "The Impact of an Increase in the Federal Minimum Wage on the Egg Industry," Staff Papers 303916, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.

  10. Trey Malone & Jayson L. Lusk, 2016. "Brewing up entrepreneurship: government intervention in beer," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 5(3), pages 325-342, November.

    Cited by:

    1. Kym Anderson & Giulia Meloni & Johan Swinnen, 2018. "Global Alcohol Markets: Evolving Consumption Patterns, Regulations, and Industrial Organizations," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 10(1), pages 105-132, October.
    2. Trey Malone & Dustin Chambers, 2017. "Quantifying Federal Regulatory Burdens in the Beer Value Chain," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(3), pages 466-471, June.
    3. Trey Malone & Joshua C. Hall, 2016. "Can Liberalization of Local Food Marketing Channels Influence Local Economies? A Case Study of West Virginia’s Craft Beer Distribution Laws," Working Papers 16-22, Department of Economics, West Virginia University.
    4. Trey Malone & Jayson L. Lusk, 2019. "Releasing The Trap: A Method To Reduce Inattention Bias In Survey Data With Application To U.S. Beer Taxes," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 57(1), pages 584-599, January.
    5. Stephan F. Gohmann, 2016. "Why Are There so Few Breweries in the South?," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 40(5), pages 1071-1092, September.
    6. Trey Malone & Jayson L. Lusk, 2018. "If you brew it, who will come? Market segments in the U.S. beer market," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 204-221, March.
    7. Howard, Philip H., 2018. "Craftwashing in the U.S. Beer Industry," EconStor Open Access Articles, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 1-13.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 4 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-AGR: Agricultural Economics (3) 2017-02-26 2018-10-15 2019-04-29. Author is listed
  2. NEP-MKT: Marketing (3) 2015-08-07 2017-02-26 2019-04-29. Author is listed
  3. NEP-CBE: Cognitive & Behavioural Economics (1) 2015-08-07. Author is listed
  4. NEP-ENV: Environmental Economics (1) 2018-10-15. Author is listed
  5. NEP-EXP: Experimental Economics (1) 2015-08-07. Author is listed

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Trey Malone should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.