IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jlofdr/339683.html

The Changing Role of Fat Perceptions in Fluid Milk Labeling: Would the Dairy Industry Sell More if 2% Milk Was Called “98% Fat Free”?

Author

Listed:
  • Kazi, Oishi
  • Miller, Steven R.
  • Malone, Trey
  • Wolf, Christopher A.

Abstract

U.S. consumers’ perceptions of fat content in food may have changed substantially over the past few decades. This is particularly relevant for the dairy industry as fluid milk is marketed with many different fat content options. Using a stated preferences contingent valuation experiment, this article explores consequences of framing effects of fat on the fluid milk label. Specifically, we investigate whether using alternative but equivalent labels of 96.75% fat free, 98% fat free and 99.98% fat free, whole, 2% fat, and skim milk change consumer willingness to pay. Results indicate that such framing effects rarely have the intended effect and that consumers would actually pay less for 2% fat milk if it were called 98% fat-free milk.

Suggested Citation

  • Kazi, Oishi & Miller, Steven R. & Malone, Trey & Wolf, Christopher A., 2022. "The Changing Role of Fat Perceptions in Fluid Milk Labeling: Would the Dairy Industry Sell More if 2% Milk Was Called “98% Fat Free”?," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 53(2), July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:339683
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.339683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/339683/files/Kazi.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.339683?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Smith, Scott M. & Roster, Catherine A. & Golden, Linda L. & Albaum, Gerald S., 2016. "A multi-group analysis of online survey respondent data quality: Comparing a regular USA consumer panel to MTurk samples," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 3139-3148.
    2. Laurent Muller & Anne Lacroix & Bernard Ruffieux, 2019. "Environmental Labelling and Consumption Changes: A Food Choice Experiment," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 73(3), pages 871-897, July.
    3. Cho, Yoon-Na & Baskin, Ernest, 2018. "It's a match when green meets healthy in sustainability labeling," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 119-129.
    4. Stewart, Hayden & Dong, Diansheng & Carlson, Andrea, "undated". "Why Are Americans Consuming Less Fluid Milk? A Look at Generational Differences in Intake Frequency," Economic Research Report 262223, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Vitaliano, Peter, . "Global Dairy Trade: Where are we, how did we get here and where are we going?," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 19(B), pages 1-10.
    6. Newman, Christopher L. & Howlett, Elizabeth & Burton, Scot, 2014. "Shopper Response to Front-of-Package Nutrition Labeling Programs: Potential Consumer and Retail Store Benefits," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 13-26.
    7. Trey Malone & Jayson L. Lusk, 2019. "Releasing The Trap: A Method To Reduce Inattention Bias In Survey Data With Application To U.S. Beer Taxes," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 57(1), pages 584-599, January.
    8. Koo, Jieun & Suk, Kwanho, 2020. "Is $0 Better than Free? Consumer Response to “$0” versus “Free” Framing of a Free Promotion," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 383-396.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Farmaki, Anna & Olya, Hossein & Taheri, Babak, 2021. "Unpacking the complex interactions among customers in online fan pages," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 164-176.
    2. Carlsson, Fredrik & Kataria, Mitesh & Lampi, Elina, 2022. "How much does it take? Willingness to switch to meat substitutes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    3. Chavez, Daniel E. & Palma, Marco A. & Nayga, Rodolfo M. & Mjelde, James W., 2020. "Product availability in discrete choice experiments with private goods," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    4. Davis, Cassandra Denise & Burton, Scot, 2019. "Making bad look good: The counterpersuasive effects of natural labels on (dangerous) vice goods," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 271-282.
    5. Mariko SHIMIZU, 2019. "Why do high ability people also suffer from money illusion? Experimental evidence of behavioral contradiction," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(1(618), S), pages 5-22, Spring.
    6. Aplin-Houtz Matthew J. & Ajaiyeoba Ifeyimika O. & Merrit Stephanie, 2025. "Love Under Duress: How Burnout Mediates the Relationship Between Partner Stress and the Perception of Romantic Partner Support," The Irish Journal of Management, Sciendo, vol. 44(1), pages 3-26.
    7. Vecchio, Riccardo & Caso, Gerarda & Cembalo, Luigi & Borrello, Massimiliano, . "Is respondents’ inattention in online surveys a major issue for research?," Economia agro-alimentare / Food Economy, Italian Society of Agri-food Economics/Società Italiana di Economia Agro-Alimentare (SIEA), vol. 22(01).
    8. van Esch, Patrick & Gadsby, Casey Lynn, 2019. "Marketing the healthiness of sports drinks: From physiological to cognitive based benefits," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 179-186.
    9. Zhang, Jinlong & Qi, Fengyu & Wu, Mingyue, 2025. "Market-oriented environmental regulation and ESG rating divergence," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    10. Hayden Stewart & Fred Kuchler & William Hahn, 2021. "Is competition among soft drinks, juices, and other major beverage categories responsible for reducing Americans' milk consumption?," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(4), pages 731-748, October.
    11. repec:agr:journl:v:1(618):y:2019:i:1(618):p:5-22 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Soregaroli, Claudio & Ricci, Elena Claire & Stranieri, Stefanella & Nayga, Rodolfo M. & Capri, Ettore & Castellari, Elena, 2021. "Carbon footprint information, prices, and restaurant wine choices by customers: A natural field experiment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    13. Cheng, Haotian & Zhang, Tong & Lambert, Dayton M. & Feuz, Ryan, 2023. "An empirical comparison of conjoint and best-worst scaling case III methods," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    14. Siv Skard & Sveinung Jørgensen & Lars Jacob Tynes Pedersen, 2021. "When is Sustainability a Liability, and When Is It an Asset? Quality Inferences for Core and Peripheral Attributes," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 109-132, September.
    15. Howard, Matt C., 2020. "Using the HEXACO-100 to measure Individual Entrepreneurial Orientation: Introducing the HEXACO-IEO," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 13(C).
    16. Höllig, Christoph E. & Tumasjan, Andranik & Welpe, Isabell M., 2020. "Individualizing gamified systems: The role of trait competitiveness and leaderboard design," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 288-303.
    17. Dannenberg, Astrid & Weingärtner, Eva, 2023. "The effects of observability and an information nudge on food choice," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    18. Mithilesh Gidage & Shilpa Bhide & Yuriy Bilan, 2025. "Greenwashing in the Indian corporate landscape: an empirical assessment of ESG disclosures of NIFTY 50 companies," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(9), pages 21861-21885, September.
    19. Shaohua He & Lei Liu & Qi Liu & Shaoling Fu, 2024. "Creating social value through operational supply chain transparency," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 2333-2351, May.
    20. Kim, Kyoung Yong & Patel, Pankaj C. & Devaraj, Srikant, 2025. "Sorting, incentive, and investment effects of employee stock ownership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    21. Romain Espinosa & Nicolas Treich, 2023. "Eliciting Non-hypothetical Willingness-to-pay for Novel Products: An Application to Cultured Meat," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 85(3), pages 673-706, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:339683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fdrssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.