IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v89y2024ipbp743-761.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Arbitrage opportunities and feedback trading in regulated bitcoin futures market: An intraday analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ngene, Geoffrey M.
  • Wang, Jinghua

Abstract

The study uses 5-min intraday Bitcoin futures and spot prices to investigate the additive and multiplicative impact of arbitrage opportunities on feedback trading in the Bitcoin futures market. The basis, equal to the difference between Bitcoin spot and futures prices, is used to proxy arbitrage opportunities. The study uses quantile regressions to capture different market conditions. The study documents episodic cases of positive and negative feedback trading. The resulting evidence reveals that the intensity and type of feedback trading largely depend on market conditions and the degree of arbitrage opportunities. From the multiplicative model, the impact of arbitrage opportunities on positive feedback trading is strongest in the extreme bear market, lowest in the regular market conditions, and absent in the bull market conditions. Channel “breakouts” analysis indicates positive feedback traders dominate during bear and normal market conditions. When the basis declines by varying magnitudes across quantiles, positive feedback trading shifts to negative feedback trading. The findings suggest widening basis intensifies negative feedback trading during bull market conditions. However, when the basis decreases by varying scales across upper quantiles, negative feedback trading switches to positive feedback trading. By observing the trading signals, investors can adjust their portfolio positions to maximize returns and minimize risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Ngene, Geoffrey M. & Wang, Jinghua, 2024. "Arbitrage opportunities and feedback trading in regulated bitcoin futures market: An intraday analysis," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(PB), pages 743-761.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:89:y:2024:i:pb:p:743-761
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2023.10.032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056023004021
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2023.10.032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:89:y:2024:i:pb:p:743-761. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.