IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ecm/emetrp/v69y2001i6p1519-1554.html

LAG Length Selection and the Construction of Unit Root Tests with Good Size and Power

Author

Listed:
  • Serena Ng
  • Pierre Perron

Abstract

It is widely known that when there are errors with a moving-average root close to - 1, a high order augmented autoregression is necessary for unit root tests to have good size, but that information criteria such as the "AIC" and the "BIC" tend to select a truncation lag ("k") that is very small. We consider a class of Modified Information Criteria ("MIC") with a penalty factor that is sample dependent. It takes into account the fact that the bias in the sum of the autoregressive coefficients is highly dependent on "k" and adapts to the type of deterministic components present. We use a local asymptotic framework in which the moving-average root is local to - 1 to document how the "MIC" performs better in selecting appropriate values of "k". In Monte-Carlo experiments, the "MIC" is found to yield huge size improvements to the "DF-super-GLS" and the feasible point optimal "P-sub-T" test developed in Elliott, Rothenberg, and Stock (1996). We also extend the "M" tests developed in Perron and Ng (1996) to allow for "GLS" detrending of the data. The "MIC" along with "GLS" detrended data yield a set of tests with desirable size and power properties. Copyright The Econometric Society.

Suggested Citation

  • Serena Ng & Pierre Perron, 2001. "LAG Length Selection and the Construction of Unit Root Tests with Good Size and Power," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 69(6), pages 1519-1554, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecm:emetrp:v:69:y:2001:i:6:p:1519-1554
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C2 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables
    • C3 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables
    • C5 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecm:emetrp:v:69:y:2001:i:6:p:1519-1554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/essssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.