IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v195y2025ics0148296325002255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pro-Self or Pro-Social? how AI and human job replacement elicit compensatory responses

Author

Listed:
  • Bai, Xiaofei
  • Zhang, Hao
  • Ma, Zengguang
  • Qi, Chenyue

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly replacing human roles in the workplace, which causes broad concerns about job losses. However, existing studies on AI job replacement have largely neglected how employment instability affects individuals’ consumption habits. This paper conducts five studies to examine how AI job replacement affects individuals’ consumption behavior. Our findings demonstrate that job replacement increases individuals’ perception of threats across various professional backgrounds. Further analysis reveals that, compared to job replacement caused by humans, AI job replacement poses a greater threat to individuals’ need for control than their need for belonging. As a result, individuals replaced by AI are more likely to engage in self-focused conspicuous consumption rather than pro-social behaviors. We confirmed the robustness of these findings by manipulating individual needs and discovered that encouraging self-affirmation significantly reduces both perceived threats and compensatory behaviors, regardless of whether the job replacement is AI-driven or human-driven.

Suggested Citation

  • Bai, Xiaofei & Zhang, Hao & Ma, Zengguang & Qi, Chenyue, 2025. "Pro-Self or Pro-Social? how AI and human job replacement elicit compensatory responses," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:195:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325002255
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325002255
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115402?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:195:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325002255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.