IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finana/v90y2023ics1057521923003897.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does alternative digital lending affect bank performance? Cross-country and bank-level evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Cuadros-Solas, Pedro J.
  • Cubillas, Elena
  • Salvador, Carlos

Abstract

This paper examines the effect of alternative digital lending provided by BigTech and FinTech firms on bank performance using cross-country and bank-level data. Using a sample of 67 developed and developing countries, we document a negative relationship between this type of digital lending and banking industry performance. The results are economically meaningful because a one-standard-deviation increase in alternative digital credit implies, on average, an 18.08% and 23.27% decrease in the return on assets (ROA) and net interest margin (NIM) of the banking system, respectively. These effects are larger in countries with less stringent banking regulations and less solid banking sectors, and in developing countries. Using bank-level data from 6205 commercial banks, we also show that the negative effect is observed on ROAs and NIMs at the bank level. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the growth in alternative digital lending negatively affects banking credit, suggesting a substitution effect. The findings remain robust after controlling for endogeneity issues and conducting several robustness tests.

Suggested Citation

  • Cuadros-Solas, Pedro J. & Cubillas, Elena & Salvador, Carlos, 2023. "Does alternative digital lending affect bank performance? Cross-country and bank-level evidence," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:90:y:2023:i:c:s1057521923003897
    DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102873
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521923003897
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102873?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:90:y:2023:i:c:s1057521923003897. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.