IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finana/v90y2023ics1057521923003514.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geopolitical threats, equity returns, and optimal hedging

Author

Listed:
  • Ali, Syed Riaz Mahmood
  • Anik, Kaysul Islam
  • Hasan, Mohammad Nurul
  • Kamal, Md Rajib

Abstract

In this paper, we demonstrate that the U.S. equity market and a few specific sectors produce significantly positive returns during high geopolitical threats, even with the presence of standard controls, whereas other major markets around the world fail to exhibit such results. We use the geopolitical threats (GPT) index of Caldara and Iacoviello (2022). We extend our study by examining the equity returns during extremely high geopolitical threats and find the results significantly positive for the U.S. equity market and two specific sectors- information technology and financials. The results of our investigation are likewise supported by the lead-lag regression and the Markov regime-switching model. Our results are robust in the presence of various alternative measures of market uncertainty indices, for instance, economic policy uncertainty, economic uncertainty, macroeconomic uncertainty etc., on a daily basis. However, the return on equity was not robust when conditional volatility and monthly frequency were considered. We also investigate and find the optimal hedging implications for investors during the presence of geopolitical threats. We find a considerable hedge alternative between the US market and gold and further explore how Geopolitical threats affect Gold and different US sectoral Exchange-traded funds (ETFs).

Suggested Citation

  • Ali, Syed Riaz Mahmood & Anik, Kaysul Islam & Hasan, Mohammad Nurul & Kamal, Md Rajib, 2023. "Geopolitical threats, equity returns, and optimal hedging," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:90:y:2023:i:c:s1057521923003514
    DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102835
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521923003514
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102835?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:90:y:2023:i:c:s1057521923003514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.