IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v292y2024ics0360544224002755.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Asymmetric volatility spillovers among new energy, ESG, green bond and carbon markets

Author

Listed:
  • Wu, Ruirui
  • Qin, Zhongfeng

Abstract

Green finance markets focus on environment-friendly investments and help address climate change. This study explores the asymmetric dynamic volatility spillovers among new energy, environmental, social and governance (ESG), green bond and carbon markets in China, by developing an asymmetric dynamic volatility connectedness approach. Our results show that (i) the persistence of asymmetric volatility shock transmission between new energy and ESG stock markets is about 40 days, which is higher than that of carbon or green bond markets; (ii) bad total volatility spillovers dominate good total volatility spillovers after the COVID-19 outbreak; (iii) for both good and bad volatility, ESG and green bond markets are mainly net transmitters, while new energy and carbon markets are mainly net receivers; and (iv) the bad volatility spillovers to new energy and ESG stock markets from other markets in the green finance system are higher than good volatility spillovers. However, the good volatility spillovers to carbon and green bond markets from other markets are higher than bad volatility spillovers. These findings provide vital insights for policymakers and investors.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu, Ruirui & Qin, Zhongfeng, 2024. "Asymmetric volatility spillovers among new energy, ESG, green bond and carbon markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:292:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224002755
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.130504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224002755
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.130504?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:292:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224002755. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.