IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/2twmp.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Non-Market Economy Status In Anti-Dumping Investigations And Proceedings: A Case Study Of Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Huynh, Pham Duy Anh

Abstract

This research investigates whether the non-market economy status of NMEs such as Vietnam disadvantages exporters in anti-dumping investigations and proceedings. The research analyses legal, procedural and other issues relating to the non-market economy status of NMEs in general and Vietnam in particular, in anti-dumping investigations and proceedings conducted by the US and the EU.

Suggested Citation

  • Huynh, Pham Duy Anh, 2022. "Non-Market Economy Status In Anti-Dumping Investigations And Proceedings: A Case Study Of Vietnam," OSF Preprints 2twmp, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:2twmp
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/2twmp
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/64feda4ff3dcd15366ddd36c/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/2twmp?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kyle Bagwell & Robert W. Staiger, 2010. "The World Trade Organization: Theory and Practice," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 2(1), pages 223-256, September.
    2. Patrick A. Messerlin & P. K. M. Tharakan, 1999. "The Question of Contingent Protection," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(9), pages 1251-1270, December.
    3. Patrick Messerlin & Mathew Tharakan, 1999. "The Question of Contingent Protection," Post-Print hal-03416493, HAL.
    4. Andrei A. Levchenko, 2007. "Institutional Quality and International Trade," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 74(3), pages 791-819.
    5. Patrick Messerlin & Mathew Tharakan, 1999. "The Question of Contingent Protection," SciencePo Working papers hal-03416493, HAL.
    6. Klingler-Vidra, Robyn & Tran, Ba Linh & Chalmers, Adam William, 2021. "Transnational experience and high-performing entrepreneurs in emerging economies: Evidence from Vietnam," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    7. Thomas J. Prusa & Ronald D. Fischer, 1999. "Contingent protection as better insurance," Departmental Working Papers 199902, Rutgers University, Department of Economics.
    8. Phan, Diep & Coxhead, Ian, 2013. "Long-run costs of piecemeal reform: Wage inequality and returns to education in Vietnam," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 1106-1122.
    9. Yavuz Arslan & Carlos Cantú, 2019. "The size of foreign exchange reserves," BIS Papers chapters, in: Bank for International Settlements (ed.), Reserve management and FX intervention, volume 104, pages 1-23, Bank for International Settlements.
    10. Narjess Boubakri & Jean-Claude Cosset, 1998. "The Financial and Operating Performance of Newly Privatized Firms: Evidence from Developing Countries," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 53(3), pages 1081-1110, June.
    11. Quoc Ngu Vu, 2003. "Technical Efficiency of Industrial State‐Owned Enterprises in Vietnam," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 17(1), pages 87-101, March.
    12. Saadia M. Pekkanen, 2001. "Aggressive Legalism: The Rules of the WTO and Japan’s Emerging Trade Strategy," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(5), pages 707-737, May.
    13. Thế Du, Huỳnh & Rosengard, Jay K., 2009. "Funding Economic Development: A Comparative Study of Financial Sector Reform in Vietnam and China," Scholarly Articles 8705901, Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
    14. Vuong, Quan-Hoang, 2009. "The Cultural Dimensions of the Vietnamese Private Entrepreneurship," OSF Preprints n2ubt, Center for Open Science.
    15. Vermulst, Edwin, 2005. "The WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement: A Commentary," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199277070.
    16. Dang Duc Son & Neil Marriott & Pru Marriott, 2006. "Users' perceptions and uses of financial reports of small and medium companies (SMCs) in transitional economies: Qualitative evidence from Vietnam," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 3(3), pages 218-235, September.
    17. Dollar, David & Kraay, Aart, 2003. "Institutions, trade, and growth : revisiting the evidence," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3004, The World Bank.
    18. Pierre‐Guillaume Méon & Khalid Sekkat, 2008. "Institutional Quality And Trade: Which Institutions? Which Trade?," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 46(2), pages 227-240, April.
    19. Joseph E. Stiglitz, 1997. "Dumping on Free Trade: The U.S. Import Trade Laws," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(2), pages 402-424, October.
    20. Carol Newman & Gaia Narciso & Finn Tarp & Vu Xuan Nguyet Hong, 2009. "The Role of Technology, Investment and Ownership Structure in the Productivity Performance of the Manufacturing Sector in Vietnam," Trinity Economics Papers tep0109, Trinity College Dublin, Department of Economics.
    21. Paul Krugman, 1986. "Strategic Trade Policy and the New International Economics," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262610450, December.
    22. James Riedel, 1997. "The Vietnamese Economy in the 1990s," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 11(2), pages 58-65, November.
    23. Patrick Messerlin & Mathew Tharakan, 1999. "The Question of Contingent Protection," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03416493, HAL.
    24. Claude Barfield, 2005. "Anti‐dumping Reform: Time to Go Back to Basics," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 719-737, May.
    25. Debaere, Peter, 2010. "Small fish–big issues: the effect of trade policy on the global shrimp market," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(2), pages 353-374, April.
    26. World Bank, 2005. "Vietnam Business : Vietnam Development Report 2006," World Bank Publications - Reports 8314, The World Bank Group.
    27. Prema-chandra Athukorala, 2009. "Transition to a Market Economy and Export Performance in Vietnam," Departmental Working Papers 2009-05, The Australian National University, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics.
    28. Hoekman, Bernard & Wauters, Jasper, 2011. "US Compliance with WTO Rulings on Zeroing in Anti-Dumping," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 5-43, January.
    29. Prusa, Thomas J., 2017. "NMEs and the Double Remedy Problem," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(4), pages 619-634, October.
    30. Chad P. Bown, 2011. "Taking Stock of Antidumping, Safeguards and Countervailing Duties, 1990–2009," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(12), pages 1955-1998, December.
    31. Klingler-Vidra, Robyn & Tran, Ba Linh & Chalmers, Adam William, 2021. "Transnational experience and high-performing entrepreneurs in emerging economies: evidence from Vietnam," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 110756, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    32. Thomas J. Prusa, 2021. "On the spread and impact of anti-dumping," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Thomas J Prusa (ed.), Economic Effects of Antidumping, chapter 4, pages 45-65, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    33. Suiwah E. Leung, 2010. "Vietnam: an economic survey," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 24(2), pages 83-103, November.
    34. Nguyen, Thuy Thu & van Dijk, Mathijs A., 2012. "Corruption, growth, and governance: Private vs. state-owned firms in Vietnam," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 2935-2948.
    35. Dollar, David & Kraay, Aart, 2003. "Institutions, trade, and growth," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 133-162, January.
    36. Joseph Pelzman, 2011. "Vietnam's Transition to a Market Economy: The Use of NME Standards in Dumping and Countervailing Investigations: or What Happened to Me On the Way to Rome?," Working Papers 2011-24, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
    37. Nelson, Douglas, 2006. "The political economy of antidumping: A survey," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 554-590, September.
    38. Cecilia Bellora & Sébastien Jean, 2016. "Granting Market Economy Status to China in the EU: An Economic Impact Assessment," CEPII Policy Brief 2016-11, CEPII research center.
    39. Joshi, Prem Lal & Ramadhan, Sayel, 2002. "The adoption of international accounting standards by small and closely held companies: evidence from Bahrain," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 429-440.
    40. Dan Ciuriak, 2005. "Anti‐dumping at 100 Years and Counting: A Canadian Perspective," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 641-649, May.
    41. Prusa, Thomas J. & Vermulst, Edwin, 2011. "United States – Continued Existence and Application of Zeroing Methodology: the end of Zeroing?," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 45-61, January.
    42. Brian D. Kelly, 2014. "Market Economies and Concurrent Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Remedies," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 17(1), pages 105-123.
    43. Truong Dong Loc & Ger Lanjouw & Robert Lensink, 2006. "The impact of privatization on firm performance in a transition economy: The case of Vietnam," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 14(2), pages 349-389, April.
    44. Bown, Chad P. & Sykes, Alan O., 2008. "The Zeroing Issue: a critical analysis of Softwood V," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(1), pages 121-142, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huynh, Pham Duy Anh, 2023. "Non-market economy status in anti-dumping investigations and proceedings: A case study of Vietnam," OSF Preprints esw4b, Center for Open Science.
    2. Javier Barbero & Giovanni Mandras & Ernesto Rodríguez-Crespo & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2021. "Quality of government and regional trade: evidence from European Union regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(7), pages 1240-1251, July.
    3. Bournakis, Ioannis & Tsoukis, Christopher, 2016. "Government size, institutions, and export performance among OECD economies," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 37-47.
    4. Faruq, Hasan A., 2011. "How institutions affect export quality," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 586-606.
    5. Maruta, Admasu Asfaw, 2019. "Trade aid, institutional quality, and trade," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 25-37.
    6. Ion MUȘCHEI, 2019. "The relationship between institutions and trade, empirical analysis from the Republic of Moldova case," Eastern European Journal for Regional Studies (EEJRS), Center for Studies in European Integration (CSEI), Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova (ASEM), vol. 5(2), pages 4-23, December.
    7. Arief Bustaman & Rina Indiastuti & B. Budiono & Titik Anas, 2022. "Quality of Indonesia’s domestic institutions and export performance in the era of global value chains," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 11(1), pages 1-29, December.
    8. Tobias D. Ketterer, 2016. "EU Anti-dumping and Tariff Cuts: Trade Policy Substitution?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(5), pages 576-596, May.
    9. Pierre-Guillaume Méon & Khalid Sekkat, 2007. "Revisiting the relationship between governance and foreign direct investment," Brussels Economic Review, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles, vol. 50(1), pages 41-61.
    10. Krammer, Sorin M.S., 2015. "Do good institutions enhance the effect of technological spillovers on productivity? Comparative evidence from developed and transition economies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 133-154.
    11. Kyle Bagwell & Chad P. Bown & Robert W. Staiger, 2016. "Is the WTO Passé?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 54(4), pages 1125-1231, December.
    12. Khalid, Usman, 2015. "Why Trading with Dictators May Nevertheless Help the People: On the Interplay between Trade, Political Regimes and Economic Institutions," Working Papers 2015:15, Lund University, Department of Economics, revised 23 Jul 2015.
    13. Anna Golovko & Hasan Sahin, 2021. "Analysis of international trade integration of Eurasian countries: gravity model approach," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(3), pages 519-548, September.
    14. Kokko, Ari & Gustavsson Tingvall, Patrik & Videnord, Josefin, 2017. "Which Antidumping Cases Reach the WTO?," Ratio Working Papers 286, The Ratio Institute.
    15. Chang, Yang-Ming & Raza, Mian F., 2023. "Dumping, antidumping duties, and price undertakings," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 131-151.
    16. Ge, Ying & Dollar, David & Yu, Xinding, 2020. "Institutions and participation in global value chains: Evidence from belt and road initiative," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    17. Francesco Pasimeni & Paolo Pasimeni, 2016. "An Institutional Analysis of the Europe 2020 Strategy," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 127(3), pages 1021-1038, July.
    18. Md. Sadik Pavel & Seikh Ruksana Burhan & Tanim Papiya, 2019. "Should Bangladesh Export to Countries with Better Institutional or Comparatively Similar Institutional Form?," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 9-26, January.
    19. Abdikarim Bashir Jama, 2020. "The Effect of Institutional Quality on Export performance of Middle East & North-Africa Region," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 4(1), pages 14-20, January.
    20. Kuncic, Aljaz, 2012. "Institutional determinants of bilateral trade: Taking another look," Kiel Advanced Studies Working Papers 462, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:2twmp. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.