Evaluating the Effectiveness of National Labor Relations Act Remedies: Analysis and Comparison with Other Workplace Penalty Policies
The goal of this paper is to examine the implied penalty policies underlying the remedies created by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) in terms of the policies' impact on employer and union behaviors. We present a simple model of deterrence as a means of evaluating workplace penalty policies in terms of their influence on employer behavior, particularly through deterrence effects. We also compare the remedies for violations embodied in the NLRA with penalty policies under other workplace legislation, such as the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Occupational Safety and Health Act. We then evaluate the size of financial costs for violations against individuals of specific provisions of the NLRA by firms and unions for the period 2000-2009. We show that the implied penalties are modest, particularly in terms of providing sufficient incentives to comply with the law in a timely manner. Given this finding, we examine other potential remedies available under the NLRA, in particular, methods to address the impact of delays (the length of time from the filing of the charge or the issuance of the charge to the time of its adjudication before an administrative law judge at the National Labor Relations Board or through the federal courts) on workplace representation through unionization.
|Date of creation:||Dec 2010|
|Publication status:||published as “ Evaluating the Effectiveness of N ational Labor Relations Act Remedies : Analysis and Comparis on with Other Workplace Penalty Polic ies, ” with D. Weil, in Research Handbook on the Economics of Labor and Employment Law , ed. C. Estlund and M. Wachter, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd . 2012, pp. 209 - 247 . Also NBER Working Paper 16626.|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.|
Web page: http://www.nber.org
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Budd, J.W. & McCall, B.P., 1994.
"The Effect of Unions on the Receipt of Unemployment Insurance Benefits,"
94-08, Minnesota - Industrial Relations Center.
- John W. Budd & Brian P. McCall, 1997. "The Effect of Unions on the Receipt of Unemployment Insurance Benefits," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 50(3), pages 478-492, April.
- Price V. Fishback & Shawn Everett Kantor, 2000. "A Prelude to the Welfare State: The Origins of Workers' Compensation," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number fish00-1.
- John S. Earle & Klara Sabirianova Peter, "undated".
"Complementarity and Custom in Wage Contract Violation,"
Upjohn Working Papers and Journal Articles
jse20092, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
- John S. Earle & Klara Sabirianova Peter, 2009. "Complementarity and Custom in Wage Contract Violation," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 91(4), pages 832-849, November.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:16626. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.