IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mon/ceddtr/90.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Crise ivoirienne, envois de fonds et pauvreté au Burkina Faso

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Pierre Lachaud

    (Groupe d'Economie du Développement Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV)

Abstract

Fondée sur les deux enquêtes auprès des ménages de 1998 et 2003, la recherche propose une analyse de la dynamique des envois de fonds de Côte d'Ivoire, et de leur impact sur la pauvreté au Burkina Faso. Deux principales conclusions émergent de cette investigation, les envois de fonds étant considérés comme un transfert exogène de revenus. En premier lieu, l'étude montre à la fois une baisse significative et une nouvelle distribution relative des envois de fonds de Côte d'Ivoire au cours de la période 1998-2003. Alors que plus de la moitié des ménages ayant des transferts bénéficiaient d'une redistribution en provenance de Côte d'Ivoire en 1998 – 21,1 pour cent –, ils n'étaient plus que 4,8 pour cent en 2003, soit le quart des familles recevant des envois de fonds. De ce fait, le volume des transferts de Côte d'Ivoire a chuté de 67,8 pour cent en termes réels entre 1998 et 2003, une évolution confirmée par les statistiques de la BCEAO concernant l' « épargne rapatriée » de ce pays. En même temps, parmi les ménages pauvres, la part relative des envois de fonds de Côte d'Ivoire a chuté – 64,5 pour cent du volume des transferts privés en 1998, contre 46,7 pour cent en 2003 –, contrairement aux ménages aisés – 30 pour cent du haut de la distribution –, et la proportion des pauvres ayant des transferts de Côte d'Ivoire a été divisée par 7,8, contre seulement 2,6 pour les riches. De plus, ces changements s'accompagnent d'une double évolution au cours de la période : (i) une diminution du montant moyen des transferts reçus de Côte d'Ivoire par les pauvres – 6,7 à 5,1 milliers de F.Cfa par tête et par an ; (ii) une forte baisse des transferts ivoiriens par rapport aux dépenses par tête. Une modélisation logistique multinomiale des déterminants de la pauvreté confirme cette évolution. En deuxième lieu, l'étude suggère une relation significative entre le déclin des envois de fonds de Côte d'Ivoire et la hausse de la pauvreté au cours de la période. Tout d'abord, l'estimation des effets potentiels des envois de fonds de Côte d'Ivoire montre, qu'en l'absence de ces derniers, l'incidence de la pauvreté aurait été supérieure de 1,6 point de pourcentage en 1998, contre seulement 0,3 point de pourcentage en 2003, un différentiel d'impact potentiel statistiquement significatif uniquement dans le premier cas. Par conséquent, la « perte d'effet potentiel » de la réduction des envois de fonds de Côte d'Ivoire, en termes de diminution du ratio de pauvreté, est de 1,3 point de pourcentage. Ensuite, la mobilisation de l'économétrie spatiale produit plusieurs enseignements. Premièrement, lorsque l'on contrôle par l'année de l'enquête, le taux d'urbanisation et l'inégalité des dépenses par tête au niveau régional, les modèles auto-régressifs mixtes suggèrent des élasticités de -0,141, -0,177 et -0,206, respectivement, pour l'incidence, la profondeur et l'inégalité de la pauvreté par rapport aux transferts ivoiriens, et permettent de prédire, par exemple, une élévation du ratio de pauvreté des ménages de 9,6 pour cent au cours de la période – la variation observée de la pauvreté au cours de cette dernière étant de 8,7 pour cent. Deuxièmement, l'estimation de modèles à régimes « spatio-temporels » fait apparaître des élasticités de la pauvreté régionale par rapport aux transferts de Côte d'Ivoire plus élevées en 1998 qu'en 2003, bien que le test de Chow spatial relativise ce résultat. Troisièmement, une approche en termes de différences met en évidence une relation inverse au niveau régional, statistiquement significative, entre le taux de croissance des transferts de Côte d'Ivoire et le taux de croissance des mesures de la pauvreté. Les élasticités, calculées à la moyenne des taux de croissance des dépenses et de l'indice de Gini, ont les valeurs de -0,105, -0,126 et -0,137, respectivement, pour le ratio, la profondeur et l'inégalité de la pauvreté. Enfin, l'étude tente d'appréhender la relation entre les envois de fonds de Côte d'Ivoire et l'inégalité des ressources des ménages, et montre l'impact assez faible de cette dernière en termes de niveau et de variation. Based on the two household surveys of 1998 and 2003, the research proposes an analysis of the dynamics of the remittances of Côte d'Ivoire, and their impact on poverty in Burkina Faso. Two principal conclusions result from this investigation, the remittances being regarded as an exogenous transfer of incomes. Firstly, the study shows a significant fall and a new relative distribution of the remittances of Côte d'Ivoire during the period 1998-2003. Whereas more half of the households having transfers profited from a redistribution coming from Côte d'Ivoire in 1998 – 21,1 percent –, they were not any more but 4,8 percent in 2003, i.e. the quarter of the families receiving remittances. So, the volume of the transfers of Côte d'Ivoire fell of 67,8 percent in real terms between 1998 and 2003, an evolution confirmed by the statistics of the BCEAO concerning the « repatriated saving » of this country. At the same time, among the poor households, the relative share of the remittances of Côte d'Ivoire fell – 64,5 percent of the volume of the private transfers in 1998, against 46,7 percent in 2003 –, contrary to the rich households – the top 30 percent of the distribution –, and the proportion of the poor having transfers of Côte d'Ivoire was divided by 7,8, against only 2,6 for the rich households. Moreover, these changes are accompanied by a double evolution during the period: (i) a reduction in the average amount of the received transfers of Côte d'Ivoire by the poor – 6,7 B 5,1 thousands of F.Cfa per capita and per annum; (ii) a strong fall of the transfers of Côte d'Ivoire compared to the expenditure per capita. A logistic multinomial modeling of the determinants of poverty confirms this evolution. Secondly, the study suggests a significant relation between the decline of the remittances of Côte d'Ivoire and the rise of poverty during the period. First of all, the estimate of the potential effects of the remittances of Côte d'Ivoire shows that, in the absence of the latter, the incidence of poverty would have been higher of 1,6 point of percentage in 1998, against only 0,3 point of percentage in 2003, a differential of potential impact only statistically significant in the first case. Consequently, the « loss of potential effect » of the reduction of the remittances of Côte d'Ivoire, in terms of decrease in the ratio of poverty, is of 1,3 point of percentage. Then, the mobilization of spatial économetrics produces several lessons. Firstly, when one controls by the year of the investigation, the rate of urbanization and the inequality of the expenditure per capita at the regional level, the spatial lag models suggest elasticities of -0,141, -0,177 and -0,206, respectively, for the incidence, the depth and the inequality of poverty with respect to remittances, and make it possible to predict, for example, a rise in the ratio of poverty of the households of 9,6 percent during the period – the variation observed of poverty during this last being of 8,7 percent. Secondly, the estimate of models of space-time regimes reveals elasticities of regional poverty with respect to the transfers of Côte d'Ivoire higher in 1998 than in 2003, although the spatial Chow test relativizes this result. Thirdly, an approach in terms of differences highlights a negative relation at the regional level, statistically significant, between the growth rate of the transfers of Côte d'Ivoire and the growth rate of poverty. The elasticities, calculated at the average of the growth rates of the expenditure and the index of Gini, have the values of -0,105, -0,126 and -0,137, respectively, for the ratio, the depth and the inequality of poverty. Lastly, the study tries to apprehend the relation between the remittances of Côte d'Ivoire and the inequality of the resources of the households, and shows the rather weak impact of the latter in terms of level and variation. (Full text in French)

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Pierre Lachaud, 2004. "Crise ivoirienne, envois de fonds et pauvreté au Burkina Faso," Documents de travail 90, Groupe d'Economie du Développement de l'Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV.
  • Handle: RePEc:mon:ceddtr:90
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Taylor, J. Edward & Zabin, Carol & Eckhoff, Kay, 1999. "Migration and rural development in El Salvador: a micro economywide perspective10," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 91-114.
    2. Richard H. Adams, Jr. & John Page, 2003. "International migration, remittances, and poverty in developing countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3179, The World Bank.
    3. Jean-Pierre Lachaud, 2004. "Transferts privés de Côte d'Ivoire et pauvreté durable et transitoire au Burkina Faso : une analyse spatio-temporelle," Documents de travail 93, Groupe d'Economie du Développement de l'Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV.
    4. Larry A. Sjaastad, 1970. "The Costs and Returns of Human Migration," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Harry W. Richardson (ed.), Regional Economics, chapter 9, pages 115-133, Palgrave Macmillan.
    5. Adams, Richard H, Jr, 1989. "Worker Remittances and Inequality in Rural Egypt," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 38(1), pages 45-71, October.
    6. Stark, Oded & Taylor, J Edward & Yitzhaki, Shlomo, 1986. "Remittances and Inequality," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 96(383), pages 722-740, September.
    7. Deininger, Klaus & Squire, Lyn, 1998. "New ways of looking at old issues: inequality and growth," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 259-287.
    8. Martin Ravallion & Shaohua Chen, 1999. "When Economic Reform is Faster Then Statistical Reform: Measuring and Explaining Income Inequality in Rural China," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 61(1), pages 33-56, February.
    9. Ralph Chami & Connel Fullenkamp & Samir Jahjah, 2005. "Are Immigrant Remittance Flows a Source of Capital for Development?," IMF Staff Papers, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 52(1), pages 55-81, April.
    10. repec:bla:revinw:v:37:y:1991:i:3:p:313-29 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Guanghua Wan, 2002. "Regression-based Inequality Decomposition: Pitfalls and a Solution Procedure," WIDER Working Paper Series DP2002-101, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    12. Quentin Wodon, 2000. "Microdeterminants of consumption, poverty, growth, and inequality in Bangladesh," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(10), pages 1337-1352.
    13. Ravallion, Martin & Datt, Gaurav, 1996. "How Important to India's Poor Is the Sectoral Composition of Economic Growth?," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 10(1), pages 1-25, January.
    14. Taylor, J. Edward, 1992. "Remittances and inequality reconsidered: Direct, indirect, and intertemporal effects," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 187-208, April.
    15. Anselin, Luc & Bera, Anil K. & Florax, Raymond & Yoon, Mann J., 1996. "Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 77-104, February.
    16. repec:bla:revinw:v:47:y:2001:i:2:p:139-63 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Jean-Pierre Lachaud, 2000. "La pauvreté aux Comores : concepts, mesure et analyse," Série de recherche 04, Groupe d'Economie du Développement de l'Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV.
    18. Jean-Pierre Lachaud, 1999. "Envois de fonds, inégalité et pauvreté au Burkina Faso," Revue Tiers Monde, Programme National Persée, vol. 40(160), pages 793-827.
    19. Kakwani, N., 1990. "Testing For Significance Of Poverty Differences ; With Application To Cote D'Ivoire," Papers 90-3, New South Wales - School of Economics.
    20. Leibbrandt, M.V. & Woolard, C.D. & Woolard, I.D., 1996. "The Contribution of Income Components to Income Inequality in South Africa. A Decomposable Gini Analysis," Papers 125a, World Bank - Living Standards Measurement.
    21. Lipton, Michael, 1980. "Migration from rural areas of poor countries: The impact on rural productivity and income distribution," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 1-24, January.
    22. Shorrocks, A F, 1982. "Inequality Decomposition by Factor Components," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(1), pages 193-211, January.
    23. Adams, Richard H., Jr., 1991. "The effects of international remittances on poverty, inequality, and development in rural Egypt:," Research reports 86, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    24. Kakwani, N., 1990. "Testing For Significance Of Poverty Differences; With Application To Cote D'Ivoire," Papers 62, World Bank - Living Standards Measurement.
    25. Jean-Pierre Lachaud, 2003. "Dynamique de pauvreté, inégalité et urbanisation au Burkina Faso," Série de recherche 07, Groupe d'Economie du Développement de l'Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV.
    26. Reimers, Cordelia W, 1983. "Labor Market Discrimination against Hispanic and Black Men," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 65(4), pages 570-579, November.
    27. Adelman, Irma & Robinson, Sherman, 1989. "Income distribution and development," Handbook of Development Economics, in: Hollis Chenery & T.N. Srinivasan (ed.), Handbook of Development Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 19, pages 949-1003, Elsevier.
    28. Hoddinott, John, 1994. "A Model of Migration and Remittances Applied to Western Kenya," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 46(3), pages 459-476, July.
    29. Jean-Pierre Lachaud, 2003. "Les déterminants de l'inégalité du bien-être au Burkina Faso : une décomposition de régression," Documents de travail 85, Groupe d'Economie du Développement de l'Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV.
    30. repec:bla:revinw:v:46:y:2000:i:2:p:139-59 is not listed on IDEAS
    31. Gary S. Fields & Gyeongjoon Yoo, 2000. "Falling Labor Income Inequality In Korea'S Economic Growth: Patterns And Underlying Causes," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 46(2), pages 139-159, June.
    32. Aaditya Mattoo & Antonia Carzaniga, 2003. "Moving People to Deliver Services," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 15088.
    33. Shlomo Yitzhaki & Robert I. Lerman, 1991. "Income Stratification And Income Inequality," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 37(3), pages 313-329, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lachaud, Jean-Pierre, 2007. "HIV prevalence and poverty in Africa: Micro- and macro-econometric evidences applied to Burkina Faso," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 483-504, May.
    2. Jean-Pierre Lachaud, 2008. "Le travail des enfants et la pauvreté en Afrique : un réexamen appliqué au Burkina Faso," Economie & Prévision, La Documentation Française, vol. 0(5), pages 47-65.
    3. Coulibaly, Issiaka & Dembélé, Moustapha, 2024. "Impacts of remittances from internal and international migrants on poverty and inequality in Mali," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jean-Pierre Lachaud, 1999. "Envois de fonds, inégalité et pauvreté au Burkina Faso," Revue Tiers Monde, Programme National Persée, vol. 40(160), pages 793-827.
    2. Zhu, Nong & Luo, Xubei, 2008. "The impact of remittances on rural poverty and inequality in China," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4637, The World Bank.
    3. Barham, Bradford & Boucher, Stephen, 1998. "Migration, remittances, and inequality: estimating the net effects of migration on income distribution," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 307-331, April.
    4. Muhammad Shahbaz & Ijaz Rehman & Nurul Mahdzan, 2014. "Linkages between income inequality, international remittances and economic growth in Pakistan," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 1511-1535, May.
    5. Brian Roberts & Malgorzata Markiewitz & Marjan Nikolov & Aleksandar Stojkov, 2008. "A Study On Determinants And Trends In Remittance Flows In Macedonia," Journal Articles, Center For Economic Analyses, pages 41-61, June.
    6. Jean-Pierre Lachaud, 2003. "Les déterminants de l'inégalité du bien-être au Burkina Faso : une décomposition de régression," Documents de travail 85, Groupe d'Economie du Développement de l'Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV.
    7. Kashif Imran & Evelyn S. Devadason & Cheong Kee Cheok, 2019. "Developmental Impacts of Remittances on Migrant-Sending Households: Micro-Level Evidence from Punjab, Pakistan," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 14(3), pages 338-366, December.
    8. Nong Zhu & Xubei Luo, 2010. "The impact of migration on rural poverty and inequality: a case study in China," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 41(2), pages 191-204, March.
    9. Mariapia Mendola, 2004. "Migration and Technological Change in Rural Households: Complements or Substitutes?," Development Working Papers 195, Centro Studi Luca d'Agliano, University of Milano.
    10. I-Ling Shen & Frédéric Docquier & Hillel Rapoport, 2010. "Remittances and inequality: a dynamic migration model," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 8(2), pages 197-220, June.
    11. Adams, Richard Jr. & Page, John, 2005. "Do international migration and remittances reduce poverty in developing countries?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 33(10), pages 1645-1669, October.
    12. Adams, Richard H., Jr., 1996. "Remittances, income distribution, and rural asset accumulation," FCND discussion papers 17, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    13. Nong Zhu & Xubei Luo, 2014. "The Impact of migration on rural poverty and inequality: a case study in China," CIRANO Working Papers 2014s-08, CIRANO.
    14. Giuliano, Paola & Ruiz-Arranz, Marta, 2009. "Remittances, financial development, and growth," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 144-152, September.
    15. Kahanec, Martin & Zimmermann, Klaus F., 2008. "Migration in an Enlarged EU: A Challenging Solution?," IZA Discussion Papers 3913, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Valerie Koechlin & Gianmarco Leon, 2007. "International Remittances and Income Inequality: An Empirical Investigation," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 123-141.
    17. Filiz Garip, 2012. "Repeat Migration and Remittances as Mechanisms for Wealth Inequality in 119 Communities From the Mexican Migration Project Data," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 49(4), pages 1335-1360, November.
    18. B. Gabriela Mundaca, 2009. "Remittances, Financial Market Development, and Economic Growth: The Case of Latin America and the Caribbean," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(2), pages 288-303, May.
    19. Ratha, Dilip & Mohapatra, Sanket & Scheja, Elina, 2011. "Impact of migration on economic and social development : a review of evidence and emerging issues," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5558, The World Bank.
    20. Aleksandr Grigoryan & Knar Khachatryan, 2018. "Remittances and Emigration Intentions: Evidence from Armenia," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp626, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • I31 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General Welfare, Well-Being
    • I32 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty
    • R23 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Household Analysis - - - Regional Migration; Regional Labor Markets; Population

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mon:ceddtr:90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.