IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/ifprid/1064.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Agricultural, food, and water nanotechnologies for the poor: Opportunities, constraints, and role of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research

Author

Listed:
  • Gruère, Guillaume
  • Narrod, Clare
  • Abbott, Linda

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Gruère, Guillaume & Narrod, Clare & Abbott, Linda, 2011. "Agricultural, food, and water nanotechnologies for the poor: Opportunities, constraints, and role of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research," IFPRI discussion papers 1064, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
  • Handle: RePEc:fpr:ifprid:1064
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/publications/ifpridp01064.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brown, Douglas R., 2009. "Starved for science: How biotechnology is being kept out of Africa, Robert Paarlberg. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2008, 235pp. US$24.95 (hardback) ISBN 978-0-674-02973-6," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 101(1-2), pages 111-112, June.
    2. Niosi, Jorge & Reid, Susan E., 2007. "Biotechnology and Nanotechnology: Science-based Enabling Technologies as Windows of Opportunity for LDCs?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 426-438, March.
    3. Geraint Howells, 2009. "Product Liability for Nanotechnology," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 381-391, December.
    4. Gruère, Guillaume & Sengupta, Debdatta, 2009. "GM-free private standards and their effects on biosafety decision-making in developing countries," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 399-406, October.
    5. Sunding, David & Zilberman, David, 2001. "The agricultural innovation process: Research and technology adoption in a changing agricultural sector," Handbook of Agricultural Economics,in: B. L. Gardner & G. C. Rausser (ed.), Handbook of Agricultural Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 4, pages 207-261 Elsevier.
    6. Koo, Won W. & Taylor, Richard D., 2008. "An Economic Analysis of Corn-based Ethanol Production," Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report 6201, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    7. Marette Stéphan & Roosen Jutta & Bieberstein Andrea & Blanchemanche Sandrine & Vandermoere Frederic, 2009. "Impact of Environmental, Societal and Health Information on Consumers' Choices for Nanofood," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 7(2), pages 1-27, December.
    8. Umali, D.L. & Feder, G. & de Haan, C., 1992. "The Balance between Public and Private Sector Activities in the Delivery of Livestock Services," World Bank - Discussion Papers 163, World Bank.
    9. Pray, Carl E. & Fuglie, Keith O., 2001. "Private Investment In Agricultural Research And International Technology Transfer In Asia," Agricultural Economics Reports 33927, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    10. Taylor, Gary & Janssen, Larry, 2008. "The Economic Impact of CRP Acres in South Dakota Returning to Crop Production," Staff Papers 080004, South Dakota State University, Department of Economics.
    11. Clare A. Narrod & Keith O. Fuglie, 2000. "Private investment in livestock breeding with implications for public research policy," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(4), pages 457-470.
    12. Cope, S. & Frewer, L.J. & Houghton, J. & Rowe, G. & Fischer, A.R.H. & de Jonge, J., 2010. "Consumer perceptions of best practice in food risk communication and management: Implications for risk analysis policy," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 349-357, August.
    13. Barry Bozeman & John Hardin & Albert Link, 2008. "Barriers To The Diffusion Of Nanotechnology," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(7-8), pages 749-761.
    14. Spielman, David J. & Pandya-Lorch, Rajul, 2009. "Millions fed: Proven successes in agricultural development," IFPRI books, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), number Millions Fed Book: 2009.
    15. Chen, Cheng-Kang & Lo, Chih-Chung & Liao, Yi-Xiang, 2008. "Optimal lot size with learning consideration on an imperfect production system with allowable shortages," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 459-469, May.
    16. Spielman, David J. & Pandya-Lorch, Rajul, 2009. "Highlights from millions fed: Proven successes in agricultural development," IFPRI books, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), number Millions Fed Booklet: 200.
    17. Falck-Zepeda, José Benjamin & Cavalieri, Anthony J. & Zambrano, Patricia, 2009. "Delivering genetically engineered crops to poor farmers: Recommendations for improved biosafety regulations in developing countries," Policy briefs 14, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    18. Spielman, David J. & Pandya-Lorch, Rajul, 2009. "Highlights from millions fed: Proven successes in agricultural development [In Chinese]," IFPRI books, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), number Millions Fed Booklet [Chi.
    19. Spielman, David J. & Zambrano, Patricia, 2013. "Policy, investment, and partnerships for agricultural biotechnology research in Africa: Emerging evidence," IFPRI book chapters,in: Falck-Zepeda, Jose Benjamin & Gruère, Guillaume P. & Sithole-Niang, Idah (ed.), Genetically modified crops in Africa: Economic and policy lessons from countries south of the Sahara, chapter 7, pages 183-205 International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    20. Khanal, Kalpana & Henneberry, Shida Rastegari & Taylor, Merritt J. & Schatzer, Raymond Joe & Epplin, Francis M. & Roberts, B. Warren & Edelson, Jonathan V. & Shrefler, Jim, 2008. "Organic and Conventional Vegetable Production in Oklahoma," 2008 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2008, Dallas, Texas 6789, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    21. Cohen, Joel I. & Paarlberg, Robert, 2004. "Unlocking Crop Biotechnology in Developing Countries--A Report from the Field," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 32(9), pages 1563-1577, September.
    22. R.P. Zentner & W.L. Peterson, 1984. "An Economic Evaluation of Public Wheat Research and Extension Expenditures in Canada," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 32(2), pages 327-353, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    CGIAR; Developing countries; nanotechnology; research and development priorities;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fpr:ifprid:1064. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.