IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Decentralizing Egypt: Not Just Another Economic Reform

In this paper we take stock of what the current system of sub-national governments is like in Egypt and then build on this assessment to suggest the form of decentralization that may be both effective and politically feasible. Practically every aspect of intergovernmental relations in Egypt seems to suffer from the lack of clarity and general vagueness. The all pervasive ambiguity is likely to be the outcome of an explicit policy design and has several main manifestations. A successful decentralization reform will require the political empowerment of local communities and this is a step that some in the current regime are unsure can be taken. At the same time there are others that feel that this is a step that the regime cannot afford not to take. Overall, there are reasons to be moderately optimistic about the prospects for fiscal decentralization reform, even if the obstacles remain formidable.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University in its series International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU with number paper0833.

in new window

Length: 46 pages
Date of creation: 01 Dec 2008
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ays:ispwps:paper0833
Contact details of provider: Phone: 404-413-0235
Fax: 404-413-0244
Web page:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

as in new window
  1. World Bank, 2007. "Ethiopia : Enhancing Human Development Outcomes Through Decentralized Service Delivery," World Bank Other Operational Studies 7711, The World Bank.
  2. Partha Gangopadhyay & Shyam Nath, 2001. "Bargaining, Coalitions and Local Expenditure," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(13), pages 2379-2391, December.
  3. World Bank, 2003. "Ethiopia : Country Financial Accountability Assessment, Volume 2. Detailed Reports," World Bank Other Operational Studies 14702, The World Bank.
  4. World Bank, 2003. "Ethiopia : Country Financial Accountability Assessment, Volume 1. Main Report," World Bank Other Operational Studies 14639, The World Bank.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ays:ispwps:paper0833. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Paul Benson)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.