IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pdu375.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Anne Duchene

Personal Details

First Name:Anne
Middle Name:
Last Name:Duchene
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pdu375
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]
https://sites.google.com/site/anneduchenesite/

Affiliation

(50%) School of Economics
LeBow College of Business
Drexel University

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (United States)
http://www.lebow.drexel.edu/Faculty/Departments/Economics/

: (215) 895-2123

2nd and Market, Matheson Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19104
RePEc:edi:dedreus (more details at EDIRC)

(50%) Institut de Préparation à l'Administration et à la Gestion (IPAG)

Paris, France
http://www.ipag.fr/

: 33 1 53 63 36 00

184 Boulevard Saint-Germain, 75006 Paris
RePEc:edi:ipagpfr (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles Chapters

Working papers

  1. Anne Duchêne, 2015. "Patent Litigation Insurance," Working Papers 2015-621, Department of Research, Ipag Business School.
  2. Bernard Caillaud & Anne Duchene, 2009. "Patent Office in innovation policy: Nobody's perfect," PSE Working Papers halshs-00575019, HAL.

Articles

  1. Anne Duchêne & Debapriya Sen & Konstantinos Serfes, 2015. "Patent Licensing and Entry Deterrence: The Role of Low Royalties," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 82, pages 1324-1348, December.
  2. Anne Duchêne & Konstantinos Serfes, 2012. "Patent Settlements as a Barrier to Entry," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(2), pages 399-429, June.
  3. Caillaud, Bernard & Duchêne, Anne, 2011. "Patent office in innovation policy: Nobody's perfect," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 242-252, March.
  4. Duchene, Anne & Waelbroeck, Patrick, 2006. "The legal and technological battle in the music industry: Information-push versus information-pull technologies," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 565-580, December.

Chapters

  1. Anne Duchene & Patrick Waelbroeck, 2005. "Peer-to-peer, piracy and the copyright law: implications for consumers and artists," Chapters,in: Developments in the Economics of Copyright, chapter 4 Edward Elgar Publishing.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Bernard Caillaud & Anne Duchene, 2009. "Patent Office in innovation policy: Nobody's perfect," PSE Working Papers halshs-00575019, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Schankerman, Mark & Schuett, Florian, 2016. "Screening for Patent Quality: Examination, Fees and the Courts," CEPR Discussion Papers 11688, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Andreea Cosnita & Jean-Philippe Tropeano, 2006. "On the effective design of the efficiency defence," Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques v06030, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).
    3. NAGAOKA Sadao & YAMAUCHI Isamu, 2017. "Information Constraint of the Patent Office and Examination Quality: Evidence from the effects of initiation lags," Discussion papers 17040, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    4. Comino, Stefano & Graziano, Clara, 2015. "How many patents does it take to signal innovation quality?," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 66-79.
    5. Johannes Koenen & Martin Peitz, 2011. "The Economics of Pending Patents," CESifo Working Paper Series 3657, CESifo Group Munich.
    6. van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, Bruno, 2010. "The quality factor in patent systems," CEPR Discussion Papers 7921, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    7. Gaétan de Rassenfosse & Adam B. Jaffe, 2015. "Are Patent Fees Effective at Weeding Out Low-Quality Patents?," Working Papers 15_01, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
    8. Christian Le Bas & Julien Pénin, 2014. "Patents and innovation : Are the brakes broken, or how to restore patents’ dynamic efficiency ?," Working Papers of BETA 2014-02, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    9. Koenen, Johannes & Peitz, Martin, 2015. "Firm reputation and incentives to “milk” pending patents," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 18-29.
    10. Eckert, Andrew & Langinier, Corinne, 2014. "A Survey of the Economics of Patent Systems and Procedures," Working Papers 2014-10, University of Alberta, Department of Economics.
    11. Yamauchi, Isamu & Nagaoka, Sadao, 2015. "Does the outsourcing of prior art search increase the efficiency of patent examination? Evidence from Japan," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(8), pages 1601-1614.
    12. Vidya Atal & Talia Bar, 2014. "Patent Quality and a Two-Tiered Patent System," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(3), pages 503-540, September.
    13. Langinier, Corinne & Marcoul, Philippe, 2007. "Patents, Search of Prior Art, and Revelation of Information," Staff General Research Papers Archive 10489, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    14. R�gibeau, P & Rockett, K & Mariam, S, 2012. "Patent Pendency, Learning Effects, and Innovation Importance at the US Patent Office," Economics Discussion Papers 2863, University of Essex, Department of Economics.
    15. Kim, Yee Kyoung & Oh, Jun Byoung, 2017. "Examination workloads, grant decision bias and examination quality of patent office," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 1005-1019.
    16. Yamauchi, Isamu & Nagaoka, Sadao, 2013. "Does the outsourcing of prior art search increase the efficiency of patent examination?," IIR Working Paper 13-12, Institute of Innovation Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    17. Florian Schuett, 2013. "Inventors and Impostors: An Analysis of Patent Examination with Self-Selection of Firms into R&D," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 660-699, September.

Articles

  1. Anne Duchêne & Debapriya Sen & Konstantinos Serfes, 2015. "Patent Licensing and Entry Deterrence: The Role of Low Royalties," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 82, pages 1324-1348, December.

    Cited by:

    1. Masahiko Hattori & Yasuhito Tanaka, 2017. "License or Entry in Duopoly with Quality Improving Innovation: Alternative Definitions of License Fee," Journal of Economics and Management, College of Business, Feng Chia University, Taiwan, vol. 13(1), pages 1-26, February.
    2. Hattori, Masahiko & Tanaka, Yasuhito, 2017. "License fees in oligopoly when outside innovator can enter the market: two-step auction," MPRA Paper 78992, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Hattori, Masahiko & Tanaka, Yasuhito, 2016. "License or entry in oligopoly," MPRA Paper 73578, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Hattori, Masahiko & Tanaka, Yasuhito, 2017. "Royalty and license fee under vertical differentiation in oligopoly with or without entry of innovator: Two-step auction," MPRA Paper 78859, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Hattori, Masahiko & Tanaka, Yasuhito, 2017. "License and entry strategies for an outside innovator under duopoly with combination of royalty and fixed fee," MPRA Paper 78854, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Stefano Colombo & Luigi Filippini, 2016. "Revenue royalties," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 118(1), pages 47-76, May.
    7. Sinha, Uday Bhanu, 2016. "Optimal value of a patent in an asymmetric Cournot duopoly market," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 93-105.
    8. Hattori, Masahiko & Tanaka, Yasuhito, 2017. "Vertical differentiation in oligopoly and license fees when outside innovator can enter the market: Two-step auction," MPRA Paper 78987, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Hattori, Masahiko & Tanaka, Yasuhito, 2017. "License and entry strategies for outside innovator in duopoly," MPRA Paper 76444, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Hattori, Masahiko & Tanaka, Yasuhito, 2017. "License and entry strategies for an outside innovator in duopoly with combination of royalty and fixed fee under vertical differentiation," MPRA Paper 78856, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Hattori, Masahiko & Tanaka, Yasuhito, 2017. "License or entry decision for innovator in international duopoly with convex cost functions," MPRA Paper 78996, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Hattori, Masahiko & Tanaka, Yasuhito, 2017. "License and entry decision for innovating firm in international duopoly under vertical differentiation," MPRA Paper 78995, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Hattori, Masahiko & Tanaka, Yasuhito, 2017. "Royalty and license fee under oligopoly with or without entry of innovator: Two-step auction," MPRA Paper 78858, University Library of Munich, Germany.

  2. Anne Duchêne & Konstantinos Serfes, 2012. "Patent Settlements as a Barrier to Entry," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(2), pages 399-429, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Stefano Colombo & Luigi Filippini, 2016. "Revenue royalties," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 118(1), pages 47-76, May.
    2. Stefano Colombo & Luigi Filippini, 2015. "Patent Licensing with Bertrand Competitors," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 83(1), pages 1-16, January.

  3. Caillaud, Bernard & Duchêne, Anne, 2011. "Patent office in innovation policy: Nobody's perfect," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 242-252, March.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  4. Duchene, Anne & Waelbroeck, Patrick, 2006. "The legal and technological battle in the music industry: Information-push versus information-pull technologies," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 565-580, December.

    Cited by:

    1. Thomes, Tim Paul, 2011. "An economic analysis of online streaming. How the music industry can generate revenues from cloud computing," ZEW Discussion Papers 11-039, ZEW - Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung / Center for European Economic Research.
    2. Maya Bacache-Beauvallet & Marc Bourreau & François Moreau, 2015. "Piracy and creation: the case of the music industry," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 245-262, April.
    3. Dyuti Banerjee, 2011. "On the sufficiency of regulatory enforcement in combating piracy," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 160-176, October.
    4. Martínez-Sánchez, Francisco, 2010. "Lobbyin to prevent commercial piracy," UMUFAE Economics Working Papers 13255, DIGITUM. Universidad de Murcia.
    5. Banerjee, Dyuti & Chatterjee, Ishita, 2010. "The impact of piracy on innovation in the presence of technological and market uncertainty," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 391-397, December.
    6. Adermon, Adrian & Liang, Che-Yuan, 2014. "Piracy and music sales: The effects of an anti-piracy law," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 90-106.
    7. Dyuti S. Banerjee, 2014. "Effectiveness of government anti-piracy enforcement policy: commitment versus non-commitment," Chapters,in: Handbook on the Economics of Copyright, chapter 15, pages 264-284 Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Thomes, Tim Paul, 2013. "An economic analysis of online streaming music services," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 81-91.
    9. Patrick Waelbroeck, 2013. "Digital music," Chapters,in: Handbook on the Digital Creative Economy, chapter 34, pages 389-398 Edward Elgar Publishing.

Chapters

  1. Anne Duchene & Patrick Waelbroeck, 2005. "Peer-to-peer, piracy and the copyright law: implications for consumers and artists," Chapters,in: Developments in the Economics of Copyright, chapter 4 Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Cited by:

    1. Maija Halonen-Akatwijuka & Tobias Regner, 2009. "Digital Technology and the Allocation of Ownership in the Music Industry," Jena Economic Research Papers 2009-096, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    2. Takeyama, Lisa N., 2009. "Copyright enforcement and product quality signaling in markets for computer software," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 291-296, November.
    3. Peitz, Martin & Waelbroeck, Patrick, 2006. "Why the music industry may gain from free downloading -- The role of sampling," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 24(5), pages 907-913, September.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Anne Duchene should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.