IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jincot/v18y2018i4d10.1007_s10842-018-0269-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

License and Entry Strategies for an Outside Innovator Under Duopoly with Combination of Royalty and Fixed Fee

Author

Listed:
  • Masahiko Hattori

    (Doshisha University)

  • Yasuhito Tanaka

    (Doshisha University)

Abstract

We consider a choice of options for an innovating firm to enter the market with or without licensing its new cost-reducing technology to an incumbent firm using a combination of royalty and fixed license fee, or to license its technology without entry. When the innovating firm licenses its technology to the incumbent firm without entry, the optimal royalty rate for the innovating firm is zero. When the innovating firm enters the market with a license, its optimal royalty rate is positive. In that case if cost functions are concave, the optimal royalty rate is one such that the incumbent firm drops out of the market with negative fixed fee, and license without entry strategy and entry with license strategy are optimal; if cost functions are strictly convex, there is an internal solution of positive optimal royalty rate with positive or negative fixed fee and entry with license strategy is optimal.

Suggested Citation

  • Masahiko Hattori & Yasuhito Tanaka, 2018. "License and Entry Strategies for an Outside Innovator Under Duopoly with Combination of Royalty and Fixed Fee," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 485-502, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jincot:v:18:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s10842-018-0269-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10842-018-0269-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10842-018-0269-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10842-018-0269-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sen, Debapriya & Tauman, Yair, 2007. "General licensing schemes for a cost-reducing innovation," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 163-186, April.
    2. Masahiko Hattori & Yasuhito Tanaka, 2016. "Subsidizing New Technology Adoption in a Stackelberg Duopoly: Cases of Substitutes and Complements," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 2(2), pages 197-215, July.
    3. X. Henry Wang & Bill Z. Yang, 2004. "On Technology Licensing In A Stackelberg Duopoly," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 448-458, December.
    4. Morton I. Kamien & Yair Tauman, 1986. "Fees Versus Royalties and the Private Value of a Patent," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 101(3), pages 471-491.
    5. La Manna, Manfredi M A, 1993. "Asymmetric Oligopoly and Technology Transfers," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 103(417), pages 436-443, March.
    6. Seade, Jesus, 1980. "The stability of cournot revisited," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 15-27, August.
    7. Masahiko Hattori & Yasuhito Tanaka, 2018. "License and Entry Strategies for an Outside Innovator Under Duopoly," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 4(1), pages 135-152, March.
    8. Hattori, Masahiko & Tanaka, Yasuhito, 2017. "License and entry strategies for outside innovator in duopoly," MPRA Paper 76444, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Sen, Debapriya & Stamatopoulos, Giorgos, 2016. "Licensing under general demand and cost functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(3), pages 673-680.
    10. Michael L. Katz & Carl Shapiro, 1985. "On the Licensing of Innovations," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 16(4), pages 504-520, Winter.
    11. Pal, Rupayan, 2010. "Technology adoption in a differentiated duopoly: Cournot versus Bertrand," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 128-136, June.
    12. Masahiko Hattori & Yasuhito Tanaka, 2016. "License or entry with vertical differentiation in duopoly," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 5(1), pages 17-29.
    13. Naoki Watanabe & Shigeo Muto, 2008. "Stable profit sharing in a patent licensing game: general bargaining outcomes," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 37(4), pages 505-523, December.
    14. Anne Duchêne & Debapriya Sen & Konstantinos Serfes, 2015. "Patent Licensing and Entry Deterrence: The Role of Low Royalties," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 82, pages 1324-1348, December.
    15. Tarun Kabiraj, 2004. "Patent Licensing in a Leadership Structure," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 72(2), pages 188-205, March.
    16. Chun‐Hsiung Liao & Debapriya Sen, 2005. "Subsidy In Licensing: Optimality And Welfare Implications," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 73(3), pages 281-299, June.
    17. Morton I. Kamien & Yair Tauman, 2002. "Patent Licensing: The Inside Story," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 70(1), pages 7-15, January.
    18. Matsumura, Toshihiro & Matsushima, Noriaki & Cato, Susumu, 2013. "Competitiveness and R&D competition revisited," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 541-547.
    19. Mayra Rebolledo & Joel Sandonís, 2012. "The effectiveness of R&D subsidies," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(8), pages 815-825, November.
    20. Dixit, Avinash K, 1986. "Comparative Statics for Oligopoly," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 27(1), pages 107-122, February.
    21. Masahiko Hattori & Yasuhito Tanaka, 2015. "Subsidy or tax policy for new technology adoption in duopoly with quadratic and linear cost functions," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 35(2), pages 1423-1433.
    22. Boone, Jan, 2001. "Intensity of competition and the incentive to innovate," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 19(5), pages 705-726, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kim, Seung-Leul & Lee, Sang-Ho, 2021. "Optimal tariffs with emissions taxes under non-restrictive two-part licensing strategies by a foreign eco-competitor," MPRA Paper 108496, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Hattori, Masahiko & Tanaka, Yasuhito, 2017. "Robustness of subsidy in licensing under vertical differentiation: General distribution and cost functions," MPRA Paper 78857, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hattori, Masahiko & Tanaka, Yasuhito, 2017. "License and entry strategies for an outside innovator in duopoly with combination of royalty and fixed fee under vertical differentiation," MPRA Paper 78856, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Hattori, Masahiko & Tanaka, Yasuhito, 2017. "Royalty and license fee under oligopoly with or without entry of innovator: Two-step auction," MPRA Paper 78858, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Masahiko Hattori & Yasuhito Tanaka, 2020. "Entry of Innovator and License in Oligopoly," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 709-731, December.
    4. Hattori, Masahiko & Tanaka, Yasuhito, 2017. "Royalty and license fee under vertical differentiation in oligopoly with or without entry of innovator: Two-step auction," MPRA Paper 78859, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Hattori, Masahiko & Tanaka, Yasuhito, 2017. "Vertical differentiation in oligopoly and license fees when outside innovator can enter the market: Two-step auction," MPRA Paper 78987, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Hattori, Masahiko & Tanaka, Yasuhito, 2017. "License and entry strategies for outside innovator in duopoly," MPRA Paper 76444, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Masahiko Hattori & Yasuhito Tanaka, 2020. "License Fees in Oligopoly When Outside Innovator can Enter the Market: Two-Step Auction," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(03), pages 1-15, September.
    8. Hattori, Masahiko & Tanaka, Yasuhito, 2017. "License and entry decision for innovating firm in international duopoly under vertical differentiation," MPRA Paper 78995, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Hattori, Masahiko & Tanaka, Yasuhito, 2016. "License or entry in oligopoly," MPRA Paper 73547, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Masahiko Hattori & Yasuhito Tanaka, 2018. "License and Entry Strategies for an Outside Innovator Under Duopoly," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 4(1), pages 135-152, March.
    11. Masahiko Hattori & Yasuhito Tanaka, 2016. "License or entry with vertical differentiation in duopoly," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 5(1), pages 17-29.
    12. Masahiko Hattori & Yasuhito Tanaka, 2016. "Subsidizing New Technology Adoption in a Stackelberg Duopoly: Cases of Substitutes and Complements," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 2(2), pages 197-215, July.
    13. Masahiko Hattori & Yasuhito Tanaka, 2017. "Competitiveness of Firm Behavior and Public Policy for New Technology Adoption in an Oligopoly," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 135-151, June.
    14. Masahiko Hattori & Yasuhito Tanaka, 2017. "Competitiveness and Subsidy or Tax Policy for New Technology Adoption in Duopoly," Global Economic Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(1), pages 18-32, January.
    15. Masahiko Hattori & Yasuhito Tanaka, 2015. "Subsidy or tax policy for new technology adoption in duopoly with quadratic and linear cost functions," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 35(2), pages 1423-1433.
    16. Masahiko Hattori & Yasuhito Tanaka, 2017. "License or Entry in Duopoly with Quality Improving Innovation: Alternative Definitions of License Fee," Journal of Economics and Management, College of Business, Feng Chia University, Taiwan, vol. 13(1), pages 1-26, February.
    17. Masahiko Hattori & Yasuhito Tanaka, 2016. "Taxation or Subsidization Policy for New Technology Adoption in Oligopoly," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 15(2), pages 161-172, December.
    18. Hattori, Masahiko & Tanaka, Yasuhito, 2017. "License or entry decision for innovator in international duopoly with convex cost functions," MPRA Paper 78996, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Masahiko Hattori & Yasuhito Tanaka, 2018. "Negative Royalty in Duopoly and Definition of License Fee: General Demand and Cost Functions," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 17(2), pages 163-178, September.
    20. Sudipto Bhattacharya & Claude d’Aspremont & Sergei Guriev & Debapriya Sen & Yair Tauman, 2014. "Cooperation in R&D: Patenting, Licensing, and Contracting," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Kalyan Chatterjee & William Samuelson (ed.), Game Theory and Business Applications, edition 2, chapter 0, pages 265-286, Springer.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Duopoly; Royalty; Fixed license fee; Concave cost function; Strictly convex cost function;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D43 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection
    • L13 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jincot:v:18:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s10842-018-0269-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.