IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jproda/v62y2024i1d10.1007_s11123-024-00722-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Wrong” skewness and endogenous regressors in stochastic frontier models: an instrument-free copula approach with an application to estimate firm efficiency in Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Rouven E. Haschka

    (Zeppelin University
    Corvinus University)

Abstract

Stochastic frontier models commonly assume positively skewed inefficiency. However, if the data speak against this assumption, sample-failure problems are often cited, but less attention is paid to economic reasons. We consider this phenomenon as a signal of distinctive population characteristics stemming from the inefficiency component, emphasizing its potential impact on evaluating market conditions. Specifically, we argue more generally that “wrong” skewness could indicate a lack of competition in the market. Moreover, endogeneity of model regressors presents another challenge, hindering the identification of causal relationships. To tackle these issues, this paper proposes an instrument-free estimation method based on Gaussian copulas to model the dependence between endogenous regressors and composite errors, while accommodating positively or negatively skewed inefficiency through simultaneous identification. Monte Carlo simulation experiments demonstrate the suitability of our estimator, comparing it with alternative methods. The contributions of this study are twofold. On the one hand, we contribute to the literature on stochastic frontier models by providing a comprehensive method for dealing with “wrong” skewness and endogenous regressors simultaneously. On the other hand, our contribution to an economic understanding of “wrong” skewness expands the comprehension of market behaviors and competition levels. Empirical findings on Vietnamese firm efficiency indicate that endogeneity hinders the detection of “wrong” skewness and suggests a lack of competitive market conditions. The latter underscores the importance of policy interventions to incentivize firms in non-competitive markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Rouven E. Haschka, 2024. "“Wrong” skewness and endogenous regressors in stochastic frontier models: an instrument-free copula approach with an application to estimate firm efficiency in Vietnam," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 71-90, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:jproda:v:62:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s11123-024-00722-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11123-024-00722-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11123-024-00722-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11123-024-00722-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. El Mehdi, Rachida & Hafner, Christian M., 2014. "Inference in stochastic frontier analysis with dependent error terms," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 104-116.
    2. Daniel, Betty C. & Hafner, Christian M. & Simar, Léopold & Manner, Hans, 2019. "Asymmetries In Business Cycles And The Role Of Oil Prices," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(4), pages 1622-1648, June.
    3. Jörg Breitung & Alexander Mayer & Dominik Wied, 2024. "Asymptotic properties of endogeneity corrections using nonlinear transformations," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 27(3), pages 362-383.
    4. Oleg Badunenko & Daniel J. Henderson, 2024. "Production analysis with asymmetric noise," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Quoc Ngu Vu, 2003. "Technical Efficiency of Industrial State‐Owned Enterprises in Vietnam," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 17(1), pages 87-101, March.
    6. Christian M. Hafner & Hans Manner & Léopold Simar, 2018. "The “wrong skewness” problem in stochastic frontier models: A new approach," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 380-400, April.
    7. Hafner, Christian & Manner, Hans & Simar, Leopold, 2013. "The “wrong skewnessâ€Ω problem in stochastic frontier models: A new approach," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2013046, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    8. Papadopoulos Alecos, 2022. "Accounting for Endogeneity in Regression Models Using Copulas: A Step-by-Step Guide for Empirical Studies," Journal of Econometric Methods, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 127-154, January.
    9. Felix Rioja & Neven Valev, 2004. "Finance and the Sources of Growth at Various Stages of Economic Development," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 42(1), pages 127-140, January.
    10. Centorrino, Samuele & Pérez-Urdiales, María, 2023. "Maximum likelihood estimation of stochastic frontier models with endogeneity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 234(1), pages 82-105.
    11. Cohen, Boyd & Winn, Monika I., 2007. "Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 29-49, January.
    12. Vo Hung Son, Tran & Coelli, Tim & Fleming, Euan, 1993. "Analysis of the technical efficiency of state rubber farms in Vietnam," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 183-201, September.
    13. Christine Amsler & Artem Prokhorov & Peter Schmidt, 2021. "A new family of copulas, with application to estimation of a production frontier system," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 1-14, February.
    14. Amsler, Christine & Prokhorov, Artem & Schmidt, Peter, 2016. "Endogeneity in stochastic frontier models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 190(2), pages 280-288.
    15. Le, Viet & Vu, Xuan-Binh (Benjamin) & Nghiem, Son, 2018. "Technical efficiency of small and medium manufacturing firms in Vietnam: A stochastic meta-frontier analysis," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 84-91.
    16. Thi Bich Tran & R. Quentin Grafton & Tom Kompas, 2008. "Firm Efficiency in a Transitional Economy: Evidence from Vietnam," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 22(1), pages 47-66, March.
    17. Murray D. Smith, 2008. "Stochastic frontier models with dependent error components," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 11(1), pages 172-192, March.
    18. David Reeb & Mariko Sakakibara & Ishtiaq P Mahmood, 2012. "From the Editors: Endogeneity in international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 43(3), pages 211-218, April.
    19. Nguyen, Thuy Thu & van Dijk, Mathijs A., 2012. "Corruption, growth, and governance: Private vs. state-owned firms in Vietnam," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 2935-2948.
    20. Waldman, Donald M., 1982. "A stationary point for the stochastic frontier likelihood," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 275-279, February.
    21. Green, Alison & Mayes, David, 1991. "Technical Inefficiency in Manufacturing Industries," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 101(406), pages 523-538, May.
    22. Jondrow, James & Knox Lovell, C. A. & Materov, Ivan S. & Schmidt, Peter, 1982. "On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 19(2-3), pages 233-238, August.
    23. Siebert, Ralph Bernd, 2017. "A structural model on the impact of prediscovery licensing and research joint ventures on innovation and product market efficiency," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 89-124.
    24. Prokhorov, Artem & Schmidt, Peter, 2009. "Likelihood-based estimation in a panel setting: Robustness, redundancy and validity of copulas," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 153(1), pages 93-104, November.
    25. Philip Arestis & Georgios Chortareas & Evangelia Desli, 2006. "Financial Development And Productive Efficiency In Oecd Countries: An Exploratory Analysis," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 74(4), pages 417-440, July.
    26. Jie Bai & Seema Jayachandran & Edmund J Malesky & Benjamin A Olken, 2019. "Firm Growth and Corruption: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 129(618), pages 651-677.
    27. Christine Amsler & Artem Prokhorov & Peter Schmidt, 2014. "Using Copulas to Model Time Dependence in Stochastic Frontier Models," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(5-6), pages 497-522, August.
    28. Tai-Hsin Huang & Nan-Hung Liu & Subal C. Kumbhakar, 2018. "Joint estimation of the Lerner index and cost efficiency using copula methods," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 799-822, March.
    29. Kutlu, Levent, 2010. "Battese-coelli estimator with endogenous regressors," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 109(2), pages 79-81, November.
    30. Hau, Le Nguyen & Evangelista, Felicitas & Thuy, Pham Ngoc, 2013. "Does it pay for firms in Asia's emerging markets to be market oriented? Evidence from Vietnam," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2412-2417.
    31. Rakesh Gupta & Junhao Yang & Parikshit K. Basu, 2014. "Market efficiency in emerging economies - case of Vietnam," International Journal of Business and Globalisation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(1), pages 25-40.
    32. Apurba Shee & Spiro E. Stefanou, 2015. "Endogeneity Corrected Stochastic Production Frontier and Technical Efficiency," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 97(3), pages 939-952.
    33. Nguyen Dong Phong & Ho Viet Tien & Vo Xuan Vinh, 2018. "Challenges for Vietnam in the Globalization Era," Asian Journal of Law and Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-3, April.
    34. Griffiths, William E. & Hajargasht, Gholamreza, 2016. "Some models for stochastic frontiers with endogeneity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 190(2), pages 341-348.
    35. Amsler, Christine & Prokhorov, Artem & Schmidt, Peter, 2017. "Endogenous environmental variables in stochastic frontier models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 199(2), pages 131-140.
    36. Arabinda Das, 2015. "Copula-based Stochastic Frontier Model with Autocorrelated Inefficiency," Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, vol. 7(2), pages 111-126, June.
    37. Rouven E. Haschka & Helmut Herwartz, 2022. "Endogeneity in pharmaceutical knowledge generation: An instrument‐free copula approach for Poisson frontier models," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 942-960, November.
    38. Graziella Bonanno & Filippo Domma, 2022. "Analytical Derivations of New Specifications for Stochastic Frontiers with Applications," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(20), pages 1-17, October.
    39. John Rand & Finn Tarp, 2012. "Firm-Level Corruption in Vietnam," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 60(3), pages 571-595.
    40. Rouven E. Haschka & Helmut Herwartz & Clara Silva Coelho & Yabibal M. Walle, 2023. "The impact of local financial development and corruption control on firm efficiency in Vietnam: evidence from a geoadditive stochastic frontier analysis," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 203-226, October.
    41. repec:dau:papers:123456789/7476 is not listed on IDEAS
    42. William C. Horrace & Christopher F. Parmeter & Ian A. Wright, 2024. "On asymmetry and quantile estimation of the stochastic frontier model," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 19-36, February.
    43. Jean-Michel Sahut & Frédéric Teulon, 2022. "The challenges of the transition to market economies for post-communist East Asian countries," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 283-292, April.
    44. Efthymios G. Tsionas, 2007. "Efficiency Measurement with the Weibull Stochastic Frontier," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 69(5), pages 693-706, October.
    45. Ryan Mutter & William Greene & William Spector & Michael Rosko & Dana Mukamel, 2013. "Investigating the impact of endogeneity on inefficiency estimates in the application of stochastic frontier analysis to nursing homes," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 101-110, April.
    46. Haschka, Rouven E. & Herwartz, Helmut, 2020. "Innovation efficiency in European high-tech industries: Evidence from a Bayesian stochastic frontier approach," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(8).
    47. Le, Viet & Harvie, Charles, 2010. "Firm Performance in Vietnam:Evidence from Manufacturing Small and Medium Enterprises," Economics Working Papers wp10-04, School of Economics, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
    48. Mike G. Tsionas, 2017. "“When, Where, and How” of Efficiency Estimation: Improved Procedures for Stochastic Frontier Modeling," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(519), pages 948-965, July.
    49. Jarmila Curtiss & Ladislav JelínekD & Tomáš Medonos & Martin Hruška & Silke Hüttel, 2021. "Investors’ impact on Czech farmland prices: a microstructural analysis," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 48(1), pages 97-157.
    50. Alecos Papadopoulos, 2021. "Measuring the effect of management on production: a two-tier stochastic frontier approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(6), pages 3011-3041, June.
    51. Carree, Martin A., 2002. "Technological inefficiency and the skewness of the error component in stochastic frontier analysis," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 101-107, September.
    52. Battese, G E & Coelli, T J, 1995. "A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 325-332.
    53. William Redmond, 2013. "Three Modes of Competition in the Marketplace," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(2), pages 423-446, April.
    54. Aigner, Dennis & Lovell, C. A. Knox & Schmidt, Peter, 1977. "Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 21-37, July.
    55. Jan-Michael Becker & Dorian Proksch & Christian M. Ringle, 2022. "Revisiting Gaussian copulas to handle endogenous regressors," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 46-66, January.
    56. Kumbhakar,Subal C. & Lovell,C. A. Knox, 2003. "Stochastic Frontier Analysis," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521666633, Enero.
    57. Carta, Alessandro & Steel, Mark F.J., 2012. "Modelling multi-output stochastic frontiers using copulas," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 3757-3773.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rouven E. Haschka, 2024. "Endogeneity in stochastic frontier models with 'wrong' skewness: copula approach without external instruments," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 33(3), pages 807-826, July.
    2. Mamonov Mikhail E. & Parmeter Christopher F. & Prokhorov Artem B., 2022. "Dependence modeling in stochastic frontier analysis," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 123-144, January.
    3. Subal C. Kumbhakar & Christopher F. Parmeter & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2022. "Stochastic Frontier Analysis: Foundations and Advances I," Springer Books, in: Subhash C. Ray & Robert G. Chambers & Subal C. Kumbhakar (ed.), Handbook of Production Economics, chapter 8, pages 331-370, Springer.
    4. Schmidt, Rouven & Kneib, Thomas, 2023. "Multivariate distributional stochastic frontier models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    5. Graziella Bonanno & Domenico De Giovanni & Filippo Domma, 2017. "The ‘wrong skewness’ problem: a re-specification of stochastic frontiers," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 49-64, February.
    6. Rouven E. Haschka & Helmut Herwartz & Clara Silva Coelho & Yabibal M. Walle, 2023. "The impact of local financial development and corruption control on firm efficiency in Vietnam: evidence from a geoadditive stochastic frontier analysis," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 203-226, October.
    7. Mustafa U. Karakaplan & Levent Kutlu, 2019. "School district consolidation policies: endogenous cost inefficiency and saving reversals," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 1729-1768, May.
    8. Orea, Luis, 2019. "The Econometric Measurement of Firms’ Efficiency," Efficiency Series Papers 2019/02, University of Oviedo, Department of Economics, Oviedo Efficiency Group (OEG).
    9. Artem Prokhorov & Kien C. Tran & Mike G. Tsionas, 2021. "Estimation of semi- and nonparametric stochastic frontier models with endogenous regressors," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(6), pages 3043-3068, June.
    10. Christine Amsler & Peter Schmidt & Wen-Jen Tsay, 2019. "Evaluating the CDF of the distribution of the stochastic frontier composed error," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 29-35, December.
    11. Alecos Papadopoulos & Christopher F. Parmeter, 2024. "The wrong skewness problem in stochastic frontier analysis: a review," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 61(2), pages 121-134, April.
    12. Graziella Bonanno & Filippo Domma, 2022. "Analytical Derivations of New Specifications for Stochastic Frontiers with Applications," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(20), pages 1-17, October.
    13. Amsler, Christine & Prokhorov, Artem & Schmidt, Peter, 2017. "Endogenous environmental variables in stochastic frontier models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 199(2), pages 131-140.
    14. Rouven E. Haschka & Helmut Herwartz, 2022. "Endogeneity in pharmaceutical knowledge generation: An instrument‐free copula approach for Poisson frontier models," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 942-960, November.
    15. Kexin Li & Jianxu Liu & Yuting Xue & Sanzidur Rahman & Songsak Sriboonchitta, 2022. "Consequences of Ignoring Dependent Error Components and Heterogeneity in a Stochastic Frontier Model: An Application to Rice Producers in Northern Thailand," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, July.
    16. Samuele Centorrino & María Pérez‐Urdiales & Boris Bravo‐Ureta & Alan Wall, 2024. "Binary endogenous treatment in stochastic frontier models with an application to soil conservation in El Salvador," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(3), pages 365-382, April.
    17. Wondmagegn Tirkaso & Atakelty Hailu, 2022. "Does neighborhood matter? Spatial proximity and farmers’ technical efficiency," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(3), pages 374-386, May.
    18. Levent Kutlu & Shasha Liu & Robin C. Sickles, 2022. "Cost, Revenue, and Profit Function Estimates," Springer Books, in: Subhash C. Ray & Robert G. Chambers & Subal C. Kumbhakar (ed.), Handbook of Production Economics, chapter 16, pages 641-679, Springer.
    19. Kutlu, Levent & Nair-Reichert, Usha, 2022. "Executive compensation and the potential for additional efficiency gains: Evidence from the Indian manufacturing sector," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    20. Badunenko, Oleg & D’Inverno, Giovanna & De Witte, Kristof, 2023. "On distinguishing the direct causal effect of an intervention from its efficiency-enhancing effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(1), pages 432-447.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jproda:v:62:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s11123-024-00722-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.