IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12341-d927910.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Structural Features and Influence Mechanism of the Low-Carbon Technology Cooperation Network Based on Temporal Exponential Random Graph Model

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoyi Shi

    (Business School, University of Jinan, Jinan 250024, China)

  • Xiaoxia Huang

    (Business School, University of Jinan, Jinan 250024, China)

  • Huifang Liu

    (Business School, University of Jinan, Jinan 250024, China)

Abstract

China actively promotes cross-regional low-carbon technology cooperation to improve low-carbon technologies and remove technological barriers to sustainable development. In this process, a cross-regional low-carbon technology cooperation network (LCTCN) has been developed and evolved. To help China rationalize the allocation of innovation resources and promote the cross-regional exchange of low-carbon technologies, we measured the LCTCN using low-carbon technology co-patents from 2011 to 2020. We investigated changes in the network structure using social network analysis. In addition, we examined the endogenous structures and exogenous factors that influence the formation of cooperation relationships in the network using a time exponential random graph model (TERGM). We came to the following conclusions: (1) The LCTCN develops toward complexity, showing prominent characteristics of spatial imbalance, heterogeneity, and core-periphery. (2) Among the endogenous structural variables, the coefficient of geometrically weighted degree (Gwdegree) is significantly negative, suggesting that regions within LCTCN tend to form partnerships with already well-connected regions. On the other hand, a positive coefficient of geometrically weighted dyad shared partner statistic (GWDSP) suggests that regions tend to link in multiple ways to each other. (3) Among the exogenous variables, the coefficient of the digital economy is significantly positive. As a result, for every level of digital economy development in a region, the probability of establishing low-carbon technology cooperation between that region and other regions increases by 87.39%. (4) External openness and geographical proximity can also facilitate establishing partnerships. The formation of low-carbon partnerships in the network results from a combination of endogenous structures and exogenous variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoyi Shi & Xiaoxia Huang & Huifang Liu, 2022. "Research on the Structural Features and Influence Mechanism of the Low-Carbon Technology Cooperation Network Based on Temporal Exponential Random Graph Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12341-:d:927910
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12341/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12341/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xu, Helian & Feng, Lianyue & Wu, Gang & Zhang, Qi, 2021. "Evolution of structural properties and its determinants of global waste paper trade network based on temporal exponential random graph models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    2. Tom Broekel & Marcel Bednarz, 2018. "Disentangling link formation and dissolution in spatial networks: An Application of a Two-Mode STERGM to a Project-Based R&D Network in the German Biotechnology Industry," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 677-704, September.
    3. Guo, Jian-Xin & Zhu, Kaiwei & Tan, Xianchun & Gu, Baihe, 2021. "Low-carbon technology development under multiple adoption risks," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    4. Li, Yaya & Zhu, Zhu & Guan, Yefeng & Kang, Yanfang, 2022. "Research on the structural features and influence mechanism of the green ICT transnational cooperation network," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 734-749.
    5. Çilem Selin Hazir, 2013. "Multilateral R&D Collaboration: An ERGM Application on Biotechnology," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Thomas Scherngell (ed.), The Geography of Networks and R&D Collaborations, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 221-237, Springer.
    6. Jie Huang & Yixin Shen & Jianjun Chen & Ying Zhou, 2022. "Regional Digital Economy Development and Enterprise Productivity: A Study of the Chinese Yangtze River Delta," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(S2), pages 118-137, November.
    7. Li, Fangye & Liu, Weiwei & Bi, Kexin, 2021. "Exploring and visualizing spatial-temporal evolution of patent collaboration networks: A case of China's intelligent manufacturing equipment industry," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    8. William Simpson, 2001. "The Quadratic Assignment Procedure (QAP)," North American Stata Users' Group Meetings 2001 1.2, Stata Users Group.
    9. Urban, Frauke, 2018. "China's rise: Challenging the North-South technology transfer paradigm for climate change mitigation and low carbon energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 320-330.
    10. Gorodnichenko, Yuriy & Svejnar, Jan & Terrell, Katherine, 2020. "Do foreign investment and trade spur innovation?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    11. Jenke, Michael & Pretzsch, Jürgen, 2021. "Network administrators facilitate information sharing among communal forest organizations in Thailand," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    12. Adam P. Balcerzak, 2017. "Digital Economy in Czech Republik, Slovakia and Hungary. Measurement with Topsis based on Entropy Measure for Objective Weighting," Working Papers 1/2017, Institute of Economic Research, revised May 2017.
    13. Fracasso, Andrea & Vittucci Marzetti, Giuseppe, 2015. "International trade and R&D spillovers," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 138-149.
    14. Severin Borenstein & Garth Saloner, 2001. "Economics and Electronic Commerce," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 15(1), pages 3-12, Winter.
    15. Betul Can & Zahoor Ahmed & Mahmood Ahmad & Muhlis Can, 2022. "Do renewable energy consumption and green trade openness matter for human well-being? Empirical evidence from European Union countries," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 164(3), pages 1043-1059, December.
    16. Huifang Liu & Xiaoyi Shi & Pengwei Yuan & Xiaoqing Dong, 2022. "Study on the Evolution of Multiple Network Resilience of Urban Agglomerations in the Yellow River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-24, September.
    17. Wang, Jianda & Dong, Kangyin & Dong, Xiucheng & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad, 2022. "Assessing the digital economy and its carbon-mitigation effects: The case of China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    18. Forman, Chris & van Zeebroeck, Nicolas, 2019. "Digital technology adoption and knowledge flows within firms: Can the Internet overcome geographic and technological distance?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(8), pages 1-1.
    19. Corrocher, Nicoletta & Mancusi, Maria Luisa, 2021. "International collaborations in green energy technologies: What is the role of distance in environmental policy stringency?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    20. Han, Jing & Guo, Ju-E & Cai, Xun & Lv, Cheng & Lev, Benjamin, 2022. "An analysis on strategy evolution of research & development in cooperative innovation network of new energy vehicle within policy transition period," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    21. Anselm Schultes & Marian Leimbach & Gunnar Luderer & Robert C. Pietzcker & Lavinia Baumstark & Nico Bauer & Elmar Kriegler & Ottmar Edenhofer, 2018. "Optimal international technology cooperation for the low-carbon transformation," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(9), pages 1165-1176, October.
    22. Leifeld, Philip & Cranmer, Skyler J., 2019. "A theoretical and empirical comparison of the temporal exponential random graph model and the stochastic actor-oriented model," Network Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(1), pages 20-51, March.
    23. Khalilzadeh, Jalayer, 2018. "Demonstration of exponential random graph models in tourism studies: Is tourism a means of global peace or the bottom line?," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 31-41.
    24. Huang, Wencheng & Shuai, Bin & Sun, Yan & Wang, Yang & Antwi, Eric, 2018. "Using entropy-TOPSIS method to evaluate urban rail transit system operation performance: The China case," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 292-303.
    25. Leng, Zhihui & Sun, Han & Cheng, Jinhua & Wang, Hai & Yao, Zhen, 2021. "China's rare earth industry technological innovation structure and driving factors: A social network analysis based on patents," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    26. Liu, Linqing & Shen, Mengyun & Sun, Da & Yan, Xiaofei & Hu, Shi, 2022. "Preferential attachment, R&D expenditure and the evolution of international trade networks from the perspective of complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 603(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tongyang Liu & Dong Xue & Yizhuo Fang & Kunpeng Zhang, 2023. "The Impact of Differentiated Development of the Digital Economy on Employment Quality—An Empirical Analysis Based on Provincial Data from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-26, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao, Guimei & Li, Wenxiu & Geng, Yong & Bleischwitz, Raimund, 2023. "Uncovering the features of global antimony resource trade network," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    2. Weko, Silvia & Goldthau, Andreas, 2022. "Bridging the low-carbon technology gap? Assessing energy initiatives for the Global South," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    3. Gopalan, Sasidaran & Reddy, Ketan & Sasidharan, Subash, 2022. "Does digitalization spur global value chain participation? Firm-level evidence from emerging markets," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    4. Jinqiu He & Huiwen Su, 2022. "Digital Transformation and Green Innovation of Chinese Firms: The Moderating Role of Regulatory Pressure and International Opportunities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-21, October.
    5. Caragliu, Andrea & Graziano, Marcello, 2022. "The spatial dimension of energy transition policies, practices and technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    6. Minha Hwang & Bart J. Bronnenberg & Raphael Thomadsen, 2010. "An Empirical Analysis of Assortment Similarities Across U.S. Supermarkets," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(5), pages 858-879, 09-10.
    7. Fan, Xiaomin & Xu, Yingzhi, 2023. "Does high-speed railway promote urban innovation? Evidence from China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    8. Liu, Weiwei & Song, Yifan & Bi, Kexin, 2021. "Exploring the patent collaboration network of China's wind energy industry: A study based on patent data from CNIPA," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    9. Anna Barwińska Małajowicz & Miroslava Knapková & Krzysztof Szczotka & Miriam Martinkovičová & Radosław Pyrek, 2022. "Energy Efficiency Policies in Poland and Slovakia in the Context of Individual Well-Being," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-29, December.
    10. Ferretti, Marco & Guerini, Massimiliano & Panetti, Eva & Parmentola, Adele, 2022. "The partner next door? The effect of micro-geographical proximity on intra-cluster inter-organizational relationships," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    11. Zhenhua Xu & Fuyi Ci, 2023. "Spatial-Temporal Characteristics and Driving Factors of Coupling Coordination between the Digital Economy and Low-Carbon Development in the Yellow River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, February.
    12. Corinne Autant-Bernard & Nadine Massard & Robin Cowan, 2014. "Editors’ introduction to spatial knowledge networks: structure, driving forces and innovative performances," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 53(2), pages 315-323, September.
    13. Marco Tortoriello & Ray Reagans & Bill McEvily, 2012. "Bridging the Knowledge Gap: The Influence of Strong Ties, Network Cohesion, and Network Range on the Transfer of Knowledge Between Organizational Units," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 1024-1039, August.
    14. Ana M. Guerra & Felipe Montes & Andrés F. Useche & Ana María Jaramillo & Silvia A. González & Jose D. Meisel & Catalina Obando & Valentina Cardozo & Ruth F. Hunter & Olga L. Sarmiento, 2020. "Effects of a Physical Activity Program Potentiated with ICTs on the Formation and Dissolution of Friendship Networks of Children in a Middle-Income Country," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-21, August.
    15. Xiaodong Yuan & Weiling Song, 2022. "Evaluating technology innovation capabilities of companies based on entropy- TOPSIS: the case of solar cell companies," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 65-76, June.
    16. Zhang, Shuwei & Bauer, Nico & Yin, Guangzhi & Xie, Xi, 2020. "Technology learning and diffusion at the global and local scales: A modeling exercise in the REMIND model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    17. Xiang-Fei Ma & Ru Zhang & Yi-Fan Ruan, 2023. "How to Evaluate the Level of Green Development Based on Entropy Weight TOPSIS: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-15, January.
    18. Jannett Highfill & Kevin O’Brien, 2007. "Bidding and prices for online art auctions: sofa art or investment," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 31(4), pages 279-292, December.
    19. Hu, Dingding & Zhou, Kaile & Li, Fangyi & Ma, Dawei, 2022. "Electric vehicle user classification and value discovery based on charging big data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    20. Luyang Tang & Bangke Lu & Tianhai Tian, 2023. "The Effect of Input Digitalization on Carbon Emission Intensity: An Empirical Analysis Based on China’s Manufacturing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-22, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12341-:d:927910. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.