IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/anr/reseco/v12y2020p431-447.html

What Can We Learn from Experimenting with Survey Methods?

Author

Listed:
  • Joachim De Weerdt
  • John Gibson
  • Kathleen Beegle

Abstract

This review covers a nascent literature that experiments with survey design to measure whether the way in which we collect socio-economic data in developing countries influences the data and affects the results of subsequent analyses. We start by showing that survey methods matter and the size of the survey design effects can be nothing short of staggering, affecting basic stylized facts of development (such as country rankings by poverty levels) and conclusions drawn from econometric analyses (such as what the returns to education are or whether small farm plots are more productive than large ones). We describe some of the emerging best practices for conducting survey experiments, including benchmarking against the truth, delving into the error-generating mechanisms, and documenting the costs of different survey approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Joachim De Weerdt & John Gibson & Kathleen Beegle, 2020. "What Can We Learn from Experimenting with Survey Methods?," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 12(1), pages 431-447, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:anr:reseco:v:12:y:2020:p:431-447
    DOI: 10.1146/annurev-resource-103019-105958
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-103019-105958
    Download Restriction: Full text downloads are only available to subscribers. Visit the abstract page for more information.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1146/annurev-resource-103019-105958?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Markhof, Yannick & Wollburg, Philip & Zezza, Alberto, 2025. "Beyond the records: Data quality and COVID-19 vaccination progress in low- and middle-income countries," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    2. Gashaw T Abate & Alan de Brauw & John Gibson & Kalle Hirvonen & Abdulazize Wolle, 2022. "Telescoping Error in Recalled Food Consumption: Evidence from a Survey Experiment in Ethiopia [Video-Based Behavioral Change Communication to Change Consumption Patterns: Experimental Evidence from Urban Ethiopia]," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 36(4), pages 889-908.
    3. Dang, Hai-Anh H & Carletto, Calogero, 2022. "Recall Bias Revisited: Measure Farm Labor Using Mixed-Mode Surveys and Multiple Imputation," IZA Discussion Papers 14997, IZA Network @ LISER.
    4. Dang, Hai-Anh H & Kilic, Talip & Hlasny, Vladimir & Abanokova, Kseniya & Carletto, Calogero, 2024. "Using Survey-to-Survey Imputation to Fill Poverty Data Gaps at a Low Cost: Evidence from a Randomized Survey Experiment," IZA Discussion Papers 16792, IZA Network @ LISER.
    5. Carletto,Calogero & Dillon,Andrew S. & Zezza,Alberto, 2021. "Agricultural Data Collection to Minimize Measurement Error and Maximize Coverage," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9745, The World Bank.
    6. Daniel Gerszon Mahler & Elizabeth Foster & Christoph Lakner & Zander Prinsloo & Rostand Tchouakam Mbouendeu & Samuel K. Tetteh-Baah, 2025. "Constructing Comparable Global Poverty Trends," Global Poverty Monitoring Technical Note Series 45, The World Bank.
    7. Masselus, Lise & Fiala, Nathan, 2024. "Whom to ask? Testing respondent effects in household surveys," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    8. Godlonton, Susan & Hernandez, Manuel A. & Paz, Cynthia, 2021. "Can survey design reduce anchoring bias in recall data? Evidence from Malawi," IFPRI discussion papers 2055, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    9. Hope Michelson, 2025. "Navigating the Measurement Frontier: New Insights Into Small Farm Realities," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 56(3), pages 526-542, May.
    10. Abate, Gashaw Tadesse & Abay, Kibrom A. & Chamberlin, Jordan & Sebsibie, Samuel, 2024. "Measuring land rental market participation in smallholder agriculture can survey design innovations improve land market participation statistics?," IFPRI discussion papers 2255, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    11. Reitmann, Ann-Kristin & Goedhuys, Micheline & Grimm, Michael & Nillesen, Eleonora E.M., 2020. "Gender attitudes in the Arab region – The role of framing and priming effects," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    12. Ambler, Kate & Herskowitz, Sylvan & Maredia, Mywish K., "undated". "Rural Labor and Long Recall Loss," Staff Paper Series 316616, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    13. James R. Stevenson & Karen Macours & Douglas Gollin, 2023. "The Rigor Revolution: New Standards of Evidence for Impact Assessment of International Agricultural Research," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 15(1), pages 495-515, October.
    14. Sofia Amaral & Lelys Dinarte-Diaz & Patricio Dominguez & Steffanny Romero & Santiago M. Perez-Vincent, 2022. "Talk or Text? Evaluating Response Rates by Remote Survey Method during Covid-19," CESifo Working Paper Series 9517, CESifo.
    15. Fiala, Nathan & Rose, Julian & Aryemo, Filder & Peters, Jörg, 2022. "The (very) long-run impacts of cash grants during a crisis," Ruhr Economic Papers 961, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    16. Abay, Kibrom A. & Ayalew, Hailemariam & Terfa, Zelalem & Karugia, Joseph & Breisinger, Clemens, 2025. "How good are livestock statistics in Africa? Can nudging and direct counting improve the quality of livestock asset data?," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    17. Abate, Gashaw T. & de Brauw, Alan & Hirvonen, Kalle & Wolle, Abdulazize, 2023. "Measuring consumption over the phone: Evidence from a survey experiment in urban Ethiopia," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    18. Kadam, Aditi & McCullough, Ellen B. & McGavock, Tamara J. & Magnan, Nicholas, 2025. "Who is asking and how? Effects of survey mode and enumerator gender on measuring women’s life experience," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    19. Daniel Gerszon Mahler & Elizabeth Foster & Samuel Tetteh-Baah, 2024. "How Improved Household Surveys Influence National and International Poverty Rates," World Bank Publications - Reports 42225, The World Bank Group.
    20. Abay, Kibrom A. & Berhane, Guush & Hoddinott, John F. & Tafere, Kibrom, 2021. "Assessing response fatigue in phone surveys: Experimental evidence on dietary diversity in Ethiopia," IFPRI discussion papers 2017, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    21. Dillon, Andrew & Karlan, Dean & Udry, Christopher & Zinman, Jonathan, 2020. "Good identification, meet good data," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    22. Fiala, Nathan & Masselus, Lise, 2022. "Whom to ask? Testing respondent effects in household surveys," Ruhr Economic Papers 935, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    23. Kalyani Raghunathan & Mai Mahmoud & Jessica Heckert & Gayathri Ramani & Greg Seymour, 2025. "Do Estimates of Women’s Control over Income and Decisionmaking Vary Across Nationally Representative Survey Programs?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 179(1), pages 95-122, August.
    24. GIBSON, John & ZHANG, Xiaoxuan & PARK, Albert & YI, Jiang & XI, Li, 2024. "Remotely measuring rural economic activity and poverty : Do we just need better sensors?," CEI Working Paper Series 2023-08, Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    25. Peterson-Wilhelm, Bailey & Schwab, Benjamin, 2024. "How does recall bias in farm labor impact separability tests?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:anr:reseco:v:12:y:2020:p:431-447. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: http://www.annualreviews.org (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.annualreviews.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.