IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iza/izadps/dp15726.html

The Effects of a Disability Employment Quota When Compliance Is Cheaper than Defiance

Author

Listed:
  • Krekó, Judit

    (Central European University)

  • Telegdy, Álmos

    (Corvinus University of Budapest)

Abstract

This paper evaluates the effects of the Hungarian disability employment quota, which requires firms over a certain size to employ people with disabilities or pay a noncompliance tax. We employ a regression discontinuity design on firm-level data to estimate the effect on the quota on the employment of persons with disabilities, when the tax increased from very low levels to 170 percent of the lowest wage cost required to meet the quota. We estimate a lower bound of the effect that takes into account the bias resulting from bunching of firms below the threshold. Firms hire 0.24–0.29 additional disabled workers on average when the tax increased, with a lower bound of 0.16. When the threshold is raised from 20 to 25 employees, bunching of firms and the estimated effect disappears around the old threshold. The policy effect is weaker in regions with few disabled individuals, implying that the policy outcomes are hampered by low labor supply, materializing in high fixed costs of hiring, as predicted by our model.

Suggested Citation

  • Krekó, Judit & Telegdy, Álmos, 2022. "The Effects of a Disability Employment Quota When Compliance Is Cheaper than Defiance," IZA Discussion Papers 15726, IZA Network @ LISER.
  • Handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp15726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://docs.iza.org/dp15726.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luis Garicano & Claire Lelarge & John Van Reenen, 2016. "Firm Size Distortions and the Productivity Distribution: Evidence from France," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(11), pages 3439-3479, November.
    2. Thomas Barnay & Emmanuel Duguet & Christine Le Clainche & Yann Videau, 2019. "An evaluation of the 1987 French Disabled Workers Act: better paying than hiring," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(4), pages 597-610, June.
    3. Miguel Ángel Malo & Ricardo Pagan, 2014. "Hiring Workers with Disabilities when a Quota Requirement Exists: The Relevance of Firm’s Size," AIEL Series in Labour Economics, in: Dario Sciulli & Miguel Ángel Malo (ed.), Disadvantaged Workers, edition 1, chapter 4, pages 49-63, AIEL - Associazione Italiana Economisti del Lavoro.
    4. Matias D. Cattaneo & Michael Jansson & Xinwei Ma, 2020. "Simple Local Polynomial Density Estimators," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 115(531), pages 1449-1455, July.
    5. Sebastian Calonico & Matias D. Cattaneo & Rocio Titiunik, 2014. "Robust data-driven inference in the regression-discontinuity design," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 14(4), pages 909-946, December.
    6. Robert R. Weathers II & Michelle Stegman Bailey, 2014. "The Impact of Rehabilitation and Counseling Services on the Labor Market Activity of Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) Beneficiaries," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(3), pages 623-648, June.
    7. Mori, Yuko & Sakamoto, Norihito, 2018. "Economic consequences of employment quota system for disabled people: Evidence from a regression discontinuity design in Japan," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 1-14.
    8. Alain Cohn & Ernst Fehr & Benedikt Herrmann & Frédéric Schneider, 2014. "Social Comparison And Effort Provision: Evidence From A Field Experiment," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 12(4), pages 877-898, August.
    9. Sebastian Calonico & Matias D. Cattaneo & Rocio Titiunik, 2014. "Robust Nonparametric Confidence Intervals for Regression‐Discontinuity Designs," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 82, pages 2295-2326, November.
    10. Felix Koenig & Barbara Petrongolo & John Van Reenen & Nitika Bagaria, 2019. "Can Helping the Sick Hurt the Able? Incentives, Information and Disruption in a Welfare Reform," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 129(624), pages 3189-3218.
    11. David Card & Alexandre Mas & Enrico Moretti & Emmanuel Saez, 2012. "Inequality at Work: The Effect of Peer Salaries on Job Satisfaction," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(6), pages 2981-3003, October.
    12. Elisabeth Fevang & Inés Hardoy & Knut Røed, 2017. "Temporary Disability and Economic Incentives," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 127(603), pages 1410-1432, August.
    13. Guido W. Imbens & Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2009. "Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 47(1), pages 5-86, March.
    14. Kluve, Jochen, 2010. "The effectiveness of European active labor market programs," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(6), pages 904-918, December.
    15. Nabanita Datta Gupta & Mona Larsen & Lars Thomsen, 2015. "Do wage subsidies for disabled workers reduce their non-employment? - evidence from the Danish Flexjob scheme," IZA Journal of Labor Policy, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 4(1), pages 1-26, December.
    16. Robert R. Weathers II & Jeffrey Hemmeter, 2011. "The impact of changing financial work incentives on the earnings of Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) beneficiaries," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 708-728, September.
    17. Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, 1991. "Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 106(4), pages 1039-1061.
    18. David Card & Raj Chetty & Andrea Weber, 2007. "Cash-on-Hand and Competing Models of Intertemporal Behavior: New Evidence from the Labor Market," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 122(4), pages 1511-1560.
    19. Silva, José I. & Vall-Castelló, Judit, 2017. "Partial disability and labor market adjustment: The case of Spain," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 23-34.
    20. Mattias Fogelgren & Petra Ornstein & Magnus Rödin & Peter Skogman Thoursie, 2023. "Is Supported Employment Effective for Young Adults with Disability Pension? Evidence from a Swedish Randomized Evaluation," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 58(2), pages 452-487.
    21. Horowitz, Joel L & Manski, Charles F, 1995. "Identification and Robustness with Contaminated and Corrupted Data," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 63(2), pages 281-302, March.
    22. Erling Barth & Alex Bryson & James C. Davis & Richard Freeman, 2016. "It's Where You Work: Increases in the Dispersion of Earnings across Establishments and Individuals in the United States," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 34(S2), pages 67-97.
    23. Zafar Nazarov & Dongug Kang & Sarah von Schrader, 2015. "Employment Quota System and Labour Market Outcomes of Individuals with Disabilities: Empirical Evidence from South Korea," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 36, pages 99-126, March.
    24. Sergi Jiménez-Martín & Arnau Juanmartí Mestres & Judit Vall Castelló, 2019. "Hiring subsidies for people with a disability: do they work?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(5), pages 669-689, July.
    25. Stijn Baert, 2016. "Wage subsidies and hiring chances for the disabled: some causal evidence," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 17(1), pages 71-86, January.
    26. Amrit Amirapu & Michael Gechter, 2020. "Labor Regulations and the Cost of Corruption: Evidence from the Indian Firm Size Distribution," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 102(1), pages 34-48, March.
    27. Jae Song & David J Price & Fatih Guvenen & Nicholas Bloom & Till von Wachter, 2019. "Firming Up Inequality," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 134(1), pages 1-50.
    28. Rafael Lalive & Jean-Philippe Wuellrich & Josef Zweimüller, 2013. "Do Financial Incentives Affect Firms’ Demand For Disabled Workers?," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 11(1), pages 25-58, February.
    29. Cladia Noack & Chistoph Rothe, 2023. "Donut Regression Discontinuity Designs," Papers 2308.14464, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2026.
    30. David S. Lee, 2009. "Training, Wages, and Sample Selection: Estimating Sharp Bounds on Treatment Effects," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 76(3), pages 1071-1102.
    31. Sarah Hamersma, 2008. "The effects of an employer subsidy on employment outcomes: A study of the work opportunity and welfare-to-work tax credits," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 498-520.
    32. Wuellrich, Jean-Philippe, 2010. "The effects of increasing financial incentives for firms to promote employment of disabled workers," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 173-176, May.
    33. Peter Harasztosi & Attila Lindner, 2019. "Who Pays for the Minimum Wage?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(8), pages 2693-2727, August.
    34. Jennifer Roberts & Karl Taylor, 2022. "New Evidence on Disability Benefit Claims in Britain: The Role of Health and the Local Labour Market," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 89(353), pages 131-160, January.
    35. Andreas Ravndal Kostol & Magne Mogstad, 2014. "How Financial Incentives Induce Disability Insurance Recipients to Return to Work," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(2), pages 624-655, February.
    36. Elisabeth Fevang & Inés Hardoy & Knut Røed, 2017. "Temporary Disability and Economic Incentives," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 127(603), pages 1410-1432, August.
    37. François Gerard & Miikka Rokkanen & Christoph Rothe, 2020. "Bounds on treatment effects in regression discontinuity designs with a manipulated running variable," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 11(3), pages 839-870, July.
    38. Vall Castello, Judit, 2012. "Promoting employment of disabled women in Spain; Evaluating a policy," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 82-91.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Márta Bisztray & Balázs Muraközy & Rita Pető, 2025. "The role of firms in the wage penalty for chronic health conditions," KRTK-KTI WORKING PAPERS 2508, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    2. Berlinski, Samuel & Gagete-Miranda, Jessica, 2025. "Enforcement spillovers under different networks: The case of quotas for persons with disabilities in Brazil," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    3. Gustavo de Souza, 2020. "Employment and Welfare Effects of the Quota for Disabled Workers in Brazil," Working Paper Series WP 2023-11, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    4. Li, Muyi & Wang, Yamo & Yue, Yang, 2025. "From welfare enterprises to broad tax incentives: Effects of employment policy changes on disabled in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Judit Krekó, 2019. "Effect of employment tax incentives: the case of disability quota in Hungary," CEU Working Papers 2019_1, Department of Economics, Central European University.
    2. Gustavo de Souza, 2020. "Employment and Welfare Effects of the Quota for Disabled Workers in Brazil," Working Paper Series WP 2023-11, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    3. Hsu, Yu-Chin & Shiu, Ji-Liang & Wan, Yuanyuan, 2024. "Testing identification conditions of LATE in fuzzy regression discontinuity designs," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 241(1).
    4. Derbyshire, Daniel W. & Jeanes, Emma & Khedmati Morasae, Esmaeil & Reh, Susan & Rogers, Morwenna, 2024. "Employer-focused interventions targeting disability employment: A systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 347(C).
    5. Tomasz Olma, 2021. "Nonparametric Estimation of Truncated Conditional Expectation Functions," Papers 2109.06150, arXiv.org.
    6. Guida Ayza Estopa, 2024. "Return-to-work policies for disability insurance recipients: The role of financial incentives," French Stata Users' Group Meetings 2024 17, Stata Users Group.
    7. Liu, Qi & Liu, Shilei & Liu, Zhaoyang & Deng, Xiangzheng & Xu, Jintao & Kontoleon, Andreas, 2025. "A regression discontinuity assessment of the differential impacts of China’s natural forest protection program across forestland property right regimes," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    8. Sergi Jiménez-Martín & Arnau Juanmarti Mestres & Judit Vall Castello, 2017. "Hiring subsidies for people with disabilities: Do they work?," Policy Papers 2017-11, FEDEA.
    9. Berlinski, Samuel & Gagete-Miranda, Jessica, 2025. "Enforcement spillovers under different networks: The case of quotas for persons with disabilities in Brazil," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    10. Nicolas R. Ziebarth, 2018. "Social Insurance and Health," Contributions to Economic Analysis, in: Health Econometrics, volume 127, pages 57-84, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    11. Alastair Langtry, 2022. "Keeping up with "The Joneses": reference dependent choice with social comparisons," Papers 2203.10305, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.
    12. Kämpfen, F.; & Gómez-Olivé, X.; & O’Donnell, O.; & Riumallo Herl, C.;, 2023. "Effectiveness of Population-Based Hypertension Screening: A Multidimensional Regression Discontinuity Design," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 23/15, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    13. Nicolas Hérault & Ha Vu & Roger Wilkins, 2020. "The effect of job search requirements on welfare receipt," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2020n16, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    14. Claudine Gartenberg & Julie Wulf, 2020. "Competition and Pay Inequality Within and Between Firms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(12), pages 5925-5943, December.
    15. Myhre, Andreas, 2021. "Intensive and Extensive Margin Labor Supply Responses to Kinks in Disability Insurance Programs," MPRA Paper 109547, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Duryea, Suzanne & Martínez, Claudia & Smith, Raimundo, 2024. "Disability Employment Quotas: Effects of Laws and Nudges," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 13375, Inter-American Development Bank.
    17. Mario Bernasconi & Tunga Kantarcı & Arthur Soest & Jan-Maarten Sonsbeek, 2024. "The added worker effect: evidence from a disability insurance reform," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1275-1316, December.
    18. Jonas Hjort & Xuan Li & Heather Sarsons, 2020. "Across-Country Wage Compression in Multinationals," NBER Working Papers 26788, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Herault, Nicolas & Vu, Ha & Wilkins, Roger, 2020. "The Effect of Job Search Requirements on Welfare Receipt," IZA Discussion Papers 13684, IZA Network @ LISER.
    20. Sylvain Chareyron & Yannick L'Horty & Philom ne Mbaye & Pascale Petit, 2022. "Impacts of quota policy and employer obligation to adapt workstations on discrimination against people with disabilities: Lessons from an experiment," TEPP Working Paper 2022-17, TEPP.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J14 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of the Elderly; Economics of the Handicapped; Non-Labor Market Discrimination
    • H32 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents - - - Firm
    • J23 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Demand

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp15726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark Fallak (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/izaaalu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.