IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jeurec/v11y2013i1p25-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Financial Incentives Affect Firms’ Demand For Disabled Workers?

Author

Listed:
  • Rafael Lalive
  • Jean-Philippe Wuellrich
  • Josef Zweimüller

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Rafael Lalive & Jean-Philippe Wuellrich & Josef Zweimüller, 2013. "Do Financial Incentives Affect Firms’ Demand For Disabled Workers?," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 11(1), pages 25-58, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jeurec:v:11:y:2013:i:1:p:25-58
    DOI: j.1542-4774.2012.01109.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2012.01109.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thomas Barnay & Emmanuel Duguet & Christine Le Clainche & Yann Videau, 2019. "An evaluation of the 1987 French Disabled Workers Act: better paying than hiring," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(4), pages 597-610, June.
    2. Stijn Baert, 2016. "Wage subsidies and hiring chances for the disabled: some causal evidence," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 17(1), pages 71-86, January.
    3. Rafael Lalive & Camille Landais & Josef Zweimüller, 2015. "Market Externalities of Large Unemployment Insurance Extension Programs," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(12), pages 3564-3596, December.
    4. Joaquín Mayorga, 2019. "The labour effect of a Disability Act. Longitudinal evidence from Chile," Working Papers wp478, University of Chile, Department of Economics.
    5. Hullegie, Patrick & Koning, Pierre, 2015. "Employee Health and Employer Incentives," IZA Discussion Papers 9310, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    6. Richard V. Burkhauser & Mary C. Daly & Nicolas R. Ziebarth, 2016. "Protecting working-age people with disabilities: experiences of four industrialized nations
      [Absicherung von Personen mit Erwerbsminderung: Erfahrungen aus vier Industrieländern]
      ," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 49(4), pages 367-386, December.
    7. N. N., 2015. "WIFO-Monatsberichte, Heft 11/2015," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 88(11), November.
    8. Nabanita Datta Gupta & Mona Larsen & Lars Thomsen, 2015. "Do wage subsidies for disabled workers reduce their non-employment? - evidence from the Danish Flexjob scheme," IZA Journal of Labor Policy, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 4(1), pages 1-26, December.
    9. René Böheim & Thomas Leoni, 2014. "Firms' Sickness Costs and Workers' Sickness Absences," NBER Working Papers 20305, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Mori, Yuko & Sakamoto, Norihito, 2018. "Economic consequences of employment quota system for disabled people: Evidence from a regression discontinuity design in Japan," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 1-14.
    11. Michael Levere & Purvi Sevak & David Stapleton, "undated". "Policy Changes for SourceAmerica Nonprofit Agencies: Impacts of Eliminating Section 14(c) and Reducing AbilityOne's Required Direct Labor Ratio," Mathematica Policy Research Reports dcbb25f4acc94421a7dd1cd45, Mathematica Policy Research.
    12. Marie-Anne Valfort, 2018. "Do anti-discrimination policies work?," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 450-450, May.
    13. Martin Falk & Werner Hölzl & Harald Oberhofer, 2015. "Die Bedeutung von unternehmensbezogenen Individualdaten für die empirische Wirtschaftsforschung und wirtschaftspolitische Beratung," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 88(11), pages 845-857, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jeurec:v:11:y:2013:i:1:p:25-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley Content Delivery). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/eeaaaea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.