IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/boe/boeewp/0723.html

Predictive regressions under asymmetric loss: factor augmentation and model selection

Author

Listed:
  • Matei Demetrescu

    (Institute for Statistics and Econometrics)

  • Sinem Hacioglu Hoke

    (Bank of England)

Abstract

The paper discusses the specifics of forecasting with factor-augmented predictive regressions under general loss functions. In line with the literature, we employ principal component analysis to extract factors from the set of predictors. We additionally extract information on the volatility of the series to be predicted, since volatility is forecast-relevant under non-quadratic loss functions. To ensure asymptotic unbiasedness of forecasts under the relevant loss, we estimate the predictive regression by minimizing the in-sample average loss. Finally, to select the most promising predictors for the series to be forecast, we employ an information criterion tailored to the relevant loss. Using a large monthly data set for the US economy, we assess the proposed adjustments in a pseudo out-of-sample forecasting exercise for various variables. As expected, the use of estimation under the relevant loss is effective. Using an additional volatility proxy as predictor and conducting model selection tailored to the relevant loss function enhances forecast performance significantly.

Suggested Citation

  • Matei Demetrescu & Sinem Hacioglu Hoke, 2018. "Predictive regressions under asymmetric loss: factor augmentation and model selection," Bank of England working papers 723, Bank of England.
  • Handle: RePEc:boe:boeewp:0723
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/working-paper/2018/predictive-regressions-under-asymmetric-loss-factor-augmentation-and-model-selection.pdf?la=en&hash=A37DC9BEB6D9FE9965F58055CD733C41E0BD53E5
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Matteo Iacopini & Francesco Ravazzolo & Luca Rossini, 2020. "Proper scoring rules for evaluating asymmetry in density forecasting," Papers 2006.11265, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2020.
    3. Karen Miranda & Pilar Poncela & Esther Ruiz, 2022. "Dynamic factor models: Does the specification matter?," SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 13(1), pages 397-428, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C53 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Forecasting and Prediction Models; Simulation Methods
    • C55 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Large Data Sets: Modeling and Analysis

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boe:boeewp:0723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Research (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/boegvuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.