IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bdr/borrec/175.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Análisis de la Descentralización Fiscal en Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • Ana María Iregui
  • Jorge Ramos
  • Luz Amparo Saavedra

Abstract

A principios de la década del noventa Colombia introdujo una serie de reformas fiscales que al parecer estuvieron dirigidas a desconcentrar el gasto nacional y a mejorar la cobertura y eficiencia en la provisión de bienes públicos.1 En esencia, las reformas redefinieron las responsabilidades de gasto en todos los niveles de gobierno y modificaron el sistema de transferencias del nivel central hacia los gobiernos municipales y departamentales. Bajo el nuevo esquema, y especialmente a partir de 1995, se empieza a evidenciar un deterioro en las finanzas del gobierno nacional y de los gobiernos territoriales: mientras el déficit de los gobiernos territoriales pasó del 0.3% del PIB en 1990 al 0.6% del PIB en 1999, el del gobierno central pasó del 1.0% de PIB al 6.8% del PIB en el mismo período (ver Cuadro 1). Uno de los interrogantes que surge de este hecho es si el nuevo esquema institucional genera incentivos perversos que expliquen la situación fiscal del sector público. Diversos analistas han evaluado el deterioro reciente de las finanzas públicas al igual que las limitaciones y alcances del proceso de “descentralización” (Bird y Fiszbein, 1999; Dillinger y Webb, 1999; Fedesarrollo, 1999; Comisión de racionalización del gasto y de las finanzas públicas, 1997; Sánchez et al, 1997; Vargas y Sarmiento, 1997; Correa y Steiner, 1994). Sin embargo, la literatura se ha quedado corta en el análisis sobre los efectos e incentivos que el proceso de desconcentración del gasto y el nuevo sistema de transferencias han podido generar en la gestión fiscal de los diferentes niveles de gobierno. Este trabajo analiza el actual marco institucional y normativo, los incentivos fiscales que este genera, las interrelaciones fiscales que existen entre el gobierno central y los gobiernos territoriales y las consecuencias que éstas tienen sobre el balance fiscal de cada uno de ellos. En particular, se hace énfasis en las limitaciones que el esquema actual impone sobre el manejo presupuestal a
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Ana María Iregui & Jorge Ramos & Luz Amparo Saavedra, 2001. "Análisis de la Descentralización Fiscal en Colombia," Borradores de Economia 175, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    • Handle: RePEc:bdr:borrec:175
    DOI: 10.32468/be.175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.32468/be.175
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32468/be.175?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dillinger, William & Webb, Steven B., 1999. "Decentralization and fiscal management in Colombia," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2122, The World Bank.
    2. Wallace E. Oates & Wallace E. Oates, 2004. "An Essay on Fiscal Federalism," Chapters, in: Environmental Policy and Fiscal Federalism, chapter 22, pages 384-414, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Alberto Alesina & Alberto Carrasquilla & Juan José Echavarría Soto, 2000. "Decentralization in Colombia," Working Papers Series. Documentos de Trabajo 2254, Fedesarrollo.
    4. Mr. Richard Miller Bird, 1999. "Rethinking Subnational Taxes: A New Look At Tax Assignment," IMF Working Papers 1999/165, International Monetary Fund.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luis Fernando Ramírez Hernández & Manuel Beltrán Garzón, 2009. "Justificación económica de la descentralización: un análisis desde las finanzas regionales," Revista Equidad y Desarrollo, Universidad de la Salle, August.
    2. Faggini, Marisa & Parziale, Anna, 2011. "Fitness landscape and tax planning: NK model for fiscal federalism," MPRA Paper 33770, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/10059 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Mare, Mauro, 2015. "Why and How should the EU budget be reformed?," MPRA Paper 76112, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Elio Londero, 2005. "‘Market Discipline’, Lending Ceilings and Subnational Finance," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 575-590, November.
    6. Gerardo A. Villa D., 2005. "Resena sobre el ajuste fiscal territorial después de la Constitución de 1991," Ensayos Sobre Economía Regional (ESER) 3458, Banco de la República - Economía Regional.
    7. Luca Gandullia, 2012. "The role of direct taxes in fiscal decentralization," DEP - series of economic working papers 6/2012, University of Genoa, Research Doctorate in Public Economics.
    8. James Alm, 2015. "Financing Urban Infrastructure: Knowns, Unknowns, And A Way Forward," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 230-262, April.
    9. Elacqua, Gregory & Munevar, Isabela & Sanchez, Fabio & Santos, Humberto, 2021. "The impact of decentralized decision-making on student outcomes and teacher quality: Evidence from Colombia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    10. Iain Begg & Henrik Enderlein & Jacques Le Cacheux & Mojmir Mrak, 2008. "Financing of the European Union Budget," Working Papers hal-03459814, HAL.
    11. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/10059 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/10059 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Szalai, Ákos, 2002. "Fiskális föderalizmus. Áttekintés [Fiscal federalism. A review]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(5), pages 424-440.
    14. Becerra, Ligia Melo, 2004. "Intergovernmental fiscal relations : the Colombian case," Economics PhD Theses 0304, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    15. Arindam Das-Gupta, 2006. "Internal Trade Barriers in India," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 7(2), pages 231-254, September.
    16. Rocabado Mejía, Carlos, 2006. "La Asignación Tributaria en Bolivia," Documentos de trabajo 7/2006, Instituto de Investigaciones Socio-Económicas (IISEC), Universidad Católica Boliviana.
    17. Sivagnanam, K. Jothi, 2007. "Poverty Reduction by Decentralisation: A Case for Rural Panchyats in Tamil Nadu," MPRA Paper 3210, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Torgler, Benno & Schneider, Friedrich & Schaltegger, Christoph A., 2007. "With or Against the People? The Impact of a Bottom-Up Approach on Tax Morale and the Shadow Economy," Berkeley Olin Program in Law & Economics, Working Paper Series qt6331x6vz, Berkeley Olin Program in Law & Economics.
    19. Stéphane Guimbert, 2002. "Réformes de la fiscalité du capital en Europe," Revue Française d'Économie, Programme National Persée, vol. 16(4), pages 113-169.
    20. Zodrow, George R, 2003. "Tax Competition and Tax Coordination in the European Union," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 10(6), pages 651-671, November.
    21. Sigman, Hilary, 2003. "Letting States Do the Dirty Work: State Responsibility for Federal Environmental Regulation," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 56(1), pages 107-122, March.
    22. World Bank, 2006. "Republic of Colombia," World Bank Publications - Reports 33924, The World Bank Group.
    23. Anastassios Chardas, 2012. "Multi-level governance and the application of the partnership principle in times of economic crisis in Greece," GreeSE – Hellenic Observatory Papers on Greece and Southeast Europe 56, Hellenic Observatory, LSE.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdr:borrec:175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Clorith Angélica Bahos Olivera (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/brcgvco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.