IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pna312.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Paulo Natenzon

Personal Details

First Name:Paulo
Middle Name:Esteban
Last Name:Natenzon
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pna312
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]
http://pnatenzon.wustl.edu
WUSTL Department of Economics Campus Box 1208 1 Brookings Drive St. Louis, MO 63130 USA
Terminal Degree:2011 Department of Economics; Princeton University (from RePEc Genealogy)

Affiliation

Olin School of Business
Washington University in St. Louis

St. Louis, Missouri (United States)
http://www.olin.wustl.edu/
RePEc:edi:oswusus (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Paulo Natenzon, 2010. "Subjective Ambiguity and Preference for Flexibility," Working Papers 1265, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Econometric Research Program..

Articles

  1. Paulo Natenzon, 2019. "Random Choice and Learning," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 127(1), pages 419-457.
  2. Gorno, Leandro & Natenzon, Paulo, 2018. "Subjective ambiguity and preference for flexibility," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 24-32.
  3. Faruk Gul & Paulo Natenzon & Wolfgang Pesendorfer, 2014. "Random Choice as Behavioral Optimization," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 82, pages 1873-1912, September.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Paulo Natenzon, 2010. "Subjective Ambiguity and Preference for Flexibility," Working Papers 1265, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Econometric Research Program..

    Cited by:

    1. Gorno, Leandro, 2016. "Additive representation for preferences over menus in finite choice settings," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 41-47.
    2. Richter, Michael & Rubinstein, Ariel, 2019. ""Convex preferences": a new definition," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 14(4), November.
    3. Honda, Edward, 2021. "Sophistication and preference inconsistency in a menu utility representation," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 116-121.
    4. Arlegi, Ritxar & Bourgeois-Gironde, Sacha & Hualde, Mikel, 2022. "Attitudes toward choice with incomplete preferences: An experimental study," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 663-679.

Articles

  1. Paulo Natenzon, 2019. "Random Choice and Learning," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 127(1), pages 419-457.

    Cited by:

    1. Roy Allen & Pawel Dziewulski & John Rehbeck, 2019. "Revealed Statistical Consumer Theory," University of Western Ontario, Departmental Research Report Series 20195, University of Western Ontario, Department of Economics.
    2. Caliari, Daniele, 2023. "Rationality is not consistency," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change SP II 2023-304, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    3. Ronayne, David & Brown, Gordon D.A., 2016. "Multi-attribute decision by sampling: An account of the attraction, comprimise and similarity effects," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1124, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    4. Ryan Webb, 2019. "The (Neural) Dynamics of Stochastic Choice," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 230-255, January.
    5. Dongwoo Lee & Hans Haller, 2022. "Selective attribute rules," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 137(3), pages 229-254, December.
    6. Jose Apesteguia & Miguel A. Ballester, 2022. "Choice-based foundations of ordered logit," Economics Working Papers 1822, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    7. Simone Bertoli & Jesus Fernandez-Huertas Moraga & Lucas Guichard, 2020. "Rational inattention and migration decisions," Post-Print hal-02902862, HAL.
    8. Jose Apesteguia & Miguel Ángel Ballester, 2020. "Separating predicted randomness from residual behavior," Economics Working Papers 1757, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    9. Duffy, Sean & Gussman, Steven & Smith, John, 2021. "Visual judgments of length in the economics laboratory: Are there brains in stochastic choice?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    10. Victor H. Aguiar & Maria Jose Boccardi & Nail Kashaev & Jeongbin Kim, 2018. "Random Utility and Limited Consideration," Papers 1812.09619, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    11. HORAN, Sean & MANZINI, Paola, 2018. "Precision may harm: The comparative statics of imprecise judgement," Cahiers de recherche 2018-13, Universite de Montreal, Departement de sciences economiques.
    12. Jose Apesteguia & Miguel Ángel Ballester, 2018. "Separating Predicted Randomness from Noise," Working Papers 1018, Barcelona School of Economics.
    13. Dewan, Ambuj & Neligh, Nathaniel, 2020. "Estimating information cost functions in models of rational inattention," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    14. Mel Win Khaw & Ziang Li & Michael Woodford, 2022. "Cognitive Imprecision and Stake-Dependent Risk Attitudes," CESifo Working Paper Series 9923, CESifo.
    15. Andrew Caplin & Daniel Martin, 2015. "A Testable Theory of Imperfect Perception," PSE - Labex "OSE-Ouvrir la Science Economique" halshs-01155313, HAL.
    16. Junnan He, 2021. "Bayesian Contextual Choices under Imperfect Perception of Attributes," Working Papers hal-03878378, HAL.
    17. Simone Cerreia-Vioglio & Fabio Maccheroni & Massimo Marinacci & Aldo Rustichini, 2020. "Multinomial logit processes and preference discovery: inside and outside the black box," Papers 2004.13376, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2021.
    18. Landry, Peter & Webb, Ryan, 2021. "Pairwise normalization: A neuroeconomic theory of multi-attribute choice," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    19. Georgios Gerasimou, 2020. "The Decision-Conflict Logit," Papers 2008.04229, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2023.
    20. Michael Woodford, 2019. "Modeling Imprecision in Perception, Valuation and Choice," NBER Working Papers 26258, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    21. Dutta, Rohan, 2020. "Gradual pairwise comparison and stochastic choice," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 15(4), November.
    22. Alisdair McKay & Filip Matejka, 2011. "Rational Inattention to Discrete Choices: A New Foundation for the Multinomial Logit Model," 2011 Meeting Papers 535, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    23. Mariana Carrera & Heather Royer & Mark Stehr & Justin Sydnor & Dmitry Taubinsky, 2019. "Who Chooses Commitment? Evidence and Welfare Implications," NBER Working Papers 26161, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    24. Duffy, Sean & Smith, John, 2020. "An economist and a psychologist form a line: What can imperfect perception of length tell us about stochastic choice?," MPRA Paper 99417, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    25. Tserenjigmid, Gerelt, 2019. "Choosing with the worst in mind: A reference-dependent model," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 631-652.
    26. Miguel Costa-Gomes & Georgios Gerasimou, 2020. "Status Quo Bias and the Decoy Effect: A Comparative Analysis in Choice under Risk," Papers 2006.14868, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2021.
    27. Andrew J. Keith & Darryl K. Ahner, 2021. "A survey of decision making and optimization under uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 300(2), pages 319-353, May.
    28. Emerson Melo, 2021. "Learning in Random Utility Models Via Online Decision Problems," Papers 2112.10993, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.
    29. William Morrison & Dmitry Taubinsky, 2019. "Rules of Thumb and Attention Elasticities: Evidence from Under- and Overreaction to Taxes," NBER Working Papers 26180, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    30. Caliari, Daniele, 2023. "Behavioural welfare analysis and revealed preference: Theory and experimental evidence," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change SP II 2023-303, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    31. Efe A. Ok & Gerelt Tserenjigmid, 2023. "Measuring Stochastic Rationality," Papers 2303.08202, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    32. Duffy, Sean & Gussman, Steven & Smith, John, 2019. "Judgments of length in the economics laboratory: Are there brains in choice?," MPRA Paper 93126, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    33. Junnan He, 2021. "Bayesian Contextual Choices under Imperfect Perception of Attributes," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03878378, HAL.
    34. Guney, Begum & Richter, Michael & Tsur, Matan, 2018. "Aspiration-based choice," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 935-956.
    35. Lang, Ruitian, 2019. "Try before you buy: A theory of dynamic information acquisition," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1057-1093.
    36. Maltz, Amnon & Rachmilevitch, Shiran, 2021. "A model of menu-dependent evaluations and comparison-aversion," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    37. Matthew Kovach & Gerelt Tserenjigmid, 2021. "Behavioral Foundations of Nested Stochastic Choice and Nested Logit," Papers 2112.07155, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2022.
    38. Emerson Melo, 2021. "Learning In Random Utility Models Via Online Decision Problems," CAEPR Working Papers 2022-003 Classification-D, Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research, Department of Economics, Indiana University Bloomington.
    39. Gerasimou, Georgios, 2012. "Asymmetric Dominance, Deferral and Status Quo Bias in a Theory of Choice with Incomplete Preferences," MPRA Paper 40097, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    40. D. Pennesi, 2016. "Deciding fast and slow," Working Papers wp1082, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    41. Michael Woodford, 2014. "An Optimizing Neuroeconomic Model of Discrete Choice," NBER Working Papers 19897, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    42. Allen, Roy & Dziewulski, Paweł & Rehbeck, John, 2022. "Making sense of monkey business: Re-examining tests of animal rationality," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 220-228.
    43. Edward Honda, 2021. "Categorical consideration and perception complementarity," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 71(2), pages 693-716, March.
    44. Simone Cerreia-Vioglio & Fabio Maccheroni & Massimo Marinacci, 2020. "Multinomial logit processes and preference discovery: outside and inside the black box," Working Papers 663, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
    45. Gerelt Tserenjigmid, 2021. "The Order-Dependent Luce Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(11), pages 6915-6933, November.

  2. Gorno, Leandro & Natenzon, Paulo, 2018. "Subjective ambiguity and preference for flexibility," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 24-32.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  3. Faruk Gul & Paulo Natenzon & Wolfgang Pesendorfer, 2014. "Random Choice as Behavioral Optimization," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 82, pages 1873-1912, September.

    Cited by:

    1. Manzini, Paola & Mariotti, Marco & Ulku, Levent, 2015. "Stochastic Complementarity," SIRE Discussion Papers 2015-60, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    2. Lin, Yun Hui & Wang, Yuan & He, Dongdong & Lee, Loo Hay, 2020. "Last-mile delivery: Optimal locker location under multinomial logit choice model," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    3. Demirkan, Yusufcan & Kimya, Mert, 2020. "Hazard rate, stochastic choice and consideration sets," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 142-150.
    4. Aguiar, Victor H. & Boccardi, Maria Jose & Dean, Mark, 2016. "Satisficing and stochastic choice," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 445-482.
    5. Steverson, Kai & Brandenburger, Adam & Glimcher, Paul, 2019. "Choice-theoretic foundations of the divisive normalization model," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 148-165.
    6. Mogens Fosgerau & Emerson Melo & André de Palma & Matthew Shum, 2017. "Discrete Choice and Rational Inattention: a General Equivalence Result," Discussion Papers 17-26, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
    7. Dongwoo Lee & Hans Haller, 2022. "Selective attribute rules," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 137(3), pages 229-254, December.
    8. Echenique, Federico & Saito, Kota & Tserenjigmid, Gerelt, 2018. "The perception-adjusted Luce model," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 67-76.
    9. Henke, Ilaria & Moyano, Amparo & Pagliara, Francesca, 2023. "Influence of high-speed rail on the decentralisation of events from big metropolitan areas to smaller intermediate cities," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    10. Mira Frick & Ryota Iijima & Tomasz Strzalecki, 2017. "Dynamic Random Utility," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2092, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    11. Duffy, Sean & Gussman, Steven & Smith, John, 2021. "Visual judgments of length in the economics laboratory: Are there brains in stochastic choice?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    12. Yukalov, V.I., 2021. "A resolution of St. Petersburg paradox," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    13. Victor H. Aguiar & Maria Jose Boccardi & Nail Kashaev & Jeongbin Kim, 2018. "Random Utility and Limited Consideration," Papers 1812.09619, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    14. Paola Manzini & Marco Mariotti, 2012. "Stochastic Choice and Consideration Sets," CEEL Working Papers 1205, Cognitive and Experimental Economics Laboratory, Department of Economics, University of Trento, Italia.
    15. Jose Apesteguia & Miguel Ángel Ballester, 2018. "Separating Predicted Randomness from Noise," Working Papers 1018, Barcelona School of Economics.
    16. Paola Manzini & Marco Mariotti, 2011. "A General Behavioural Model of Random Choice," Carlo Alberto Notebooks 237, Collegio Carlo Alberto.
    17. Ma, Wei, 2017. "Perturbed utility and general equilibrium analysis," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 122-131.
    18. Junnan He, 2021. "Bayesian Contextual Choices under Imperfect Perception of Attributes," Working Papers hal-03878378, HAL.
    19. Breitmoser, Yves, 2017. "Discrete Choice with Presentation Effects," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 35, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    20. Jose Apesteguia & Miguel Ángel Ballester, 2014. "A Measure of Rationality and Welfare," Working Papers 573, Barcelona School of Economics.
    21. Lambrecht, Marco, 2020. "Independence of alternatives in ranking models," Working Papers 0688, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
    22. Wei Ma, 2017. "Perturbed Utility and General Equilibrium Analysis," Working Papers 201701, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    23. Jose Apesteguia & Miguel A. Ballester, 2016. "Single-crossing random utility models," Economics Working Papers 1515, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    24. Jose P. Arrieta & Yash R. Shrestha, 2022. "On the strategic value of equifinal choice," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 11(2), pages 37-45, June.
    25. Germano, Fabrizio & Sobbrio, Francesco, 2020. "Opinion dynamics via search engines (and other algorithmic gatekeepers)," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    26. Faro, José Heleno, 2023. "The Luce model with replicas," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    27. Manzini, Paola & Mariotti, Marco, 2014. "Imperfect Attention and Menu Evaluation," SIRE Discussion Papers 2014-012, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    28. Manzini, Paola & Mariotti, Marco, 2018. "Dual random utility maximisation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 162-182.
    29. Yosuke Hashidate, 2018. "Preferences for Randomization and Anticipated Utility," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-1083, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    30. Ubøe, Jan & Andersson, Jonas & Jörnsten, Kurt & Lillestøl, Jostein & Sandal, Leif, 2017. "Statistical testing of bounded rationality with applications to the newsvendor model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(1), pages 251-261.
    31. Jose Apesteguia & Miguel A. Ballester, 2016. "Stochastic representatitve agent," Economics Working Papers 1536, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    32. Roy Allen & John Rehbeck, 2023. "Revealed stochastic choice with attributes," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 75(1), pages 91-112, January.
    33. Alisdair McKay & Filip Matejka, 2011. "Rational Inattention to Discrete Choices: A New Foundation for the Multinomial Logit Model," 2011 Meeting Papers 535, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    34. Cervellati, Matteo & Gulino, Giorgio & Roberti, Paolo, 2022. "Random Power to Parties and Policies in Coalition Governments," CEPR Discussion Papers 14906, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    35. Yves Breitmoser, 2021. "An axiomatic foundation of conditional logit," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 72(1), pages 245-261, July.
    36. Matias D. Cattaneo & Xinwei Ma & Yusufcan Masatlioglu & Elchin Suleymanov, 2020. "A Random Attention Model," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(7), pages 2796-2836.
    37. V. I. Yukalov, 2021. "A Resolution of St. Petersburg Paradox," Papers 2111.14635, arXiv.org.
    38. Chew, Soo Hong & Miao, Bin & Shen, Qiang & Zhong, Songfa, 2022. "Multiple-switching behavior in choice-list elicitation of risk preference," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    39. Lin, Yun Hui & Wang, Yuan & Lee, Loo Hay & Chew, Ek Peng, 2022. "Omnichannel facility location and fulfillment optimization," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 187-209.
    40. Efe A. Ok & Gerelt Tserenjigmid, 2023. "Measuring Stochastic Rationality," Papers 2303.08202, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    41. Francesco Cerigioni & Simone Galperti, 2021. "Listing Specs: The Effect of Framing Attributes on Choice," Working Papers 1247, Barcelona School of Economics.
    42. Lin, Yunhui & Wang, Yuan & Lee, Loo Hay & Chew, Ek Peng, 2022. "Profit-maximizing parcel locker location problem under threshold Luce model," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    43. Junnan He, 2021. "Bayesian Contextual Choices under Imperfect Perception of Attributes," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03878378, HAL.
    44. Ahn, David S. & Echenique, Federico & Saito, Kota, 2018. "On path independent stochastic choice," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 13(1), January.
    45. Yegane, Ece, 2022. "Stochastic choice with limited memory," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    46. Matthew Kovach & Gerelt Tserenjigmid, 2021. "Behavioral Foundations of Nested Stochastic Choice and Nested Logit," Papers 2112.07155, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2022.
    47. Jose Apesteguia & Miguel Angel Ballester, 2014. "Discrete Choice Estimation of Time Preferences," Working Papers 787, Barcelona School of Economics.
    48. Daniel E. Chavez & Marco A. Palma, 2019. "Pushing subjects beyond rationality with more alternatives in experimental auctions," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 50(2), pages 207-217, March.
    49. Breitmoser, Yves, 2018. "The Axiomatic Foundation of Logit," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 78, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    50. D. Pennesi, 2016. "Intertemporal discrete choice," Working Papers wp1061, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    51. Bleile, Jörg, 2016. "Limited Attention in Case-Based Belief Formation," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 518, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    52. Federico Echenique & Kota Saito, 2019. "General Luce model," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 68(4), pages 811-826, November.
    53. Doğan, Serhat & Yıldız, Kemal, 2021. "Odds supermodularity and the Luce rule," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 443-452.
    54. Clithero, John A., 2018. "Improving out-of-sample predictions using response times and a model of the decision process," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 344-375.
    55. Heydari, Pedram, 2021. "Luce arbitrates: Stochastic resolution of inner conflicts," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 33-74.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Paulo Esteban Natenzon should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.