IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pla484.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Nathan Larson

Personal Details

First Name:Nathan
Middle Name:
Last Name:Larson
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pla484
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]
http://www.american.edu/cas/faculty/nlarson.cfm
Terminal Degree:2001 Economics Department; Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) (from RePEc Genealogy)

Affiliation

Department of Economics
American University

Washington, District of Columbia (United States)
http://www.american.edu/cas/economics/
RePEc:edi:deameus (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Anderson, Simon & Baik, Alicia & Larson, Nathan, 2019. "Price Discrimination in the Information Age: Prices, Poaching, and Privacy with Personalized Targeted Discounts," CEPR Discussion Papers 13793, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  2. Anderson, Simon & Baik, Alicia & Larson, Nathan, 2015. "Personalized Pricing and Advertising: An Asymmetric Equilibrium Analysis," CEPR Discussion Papers 10464, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  3. Ralph Sonenshine & Nathan Larson & Michael Cauvel, 2015. "The Effect of Mergers, Divestitures, and Board Composition on CEO Compensation Before and After the Financial Crisis," Working Papers 2015-08, American University, Department of Economics.
  4. Larson, Nathan, 2011. "Network security," MPRA Paper 32822, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  5. Larson, Nathan, 2011. "Clustering on the same news sources in an asset market," MPRA Paper 32823, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  6. Larson, Nathan, 2008. "Inertia in social learning from a summary statistic," MPRA Paper 32143, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Jul 2011.
  7. Marco Angrisani & Antonio Guarino & Steffen Huck & Nathan Larson, 2008. "No-Trade in the Laboratory," CESifo Working Paper Series 2436, CESifo.
  8. Larson, Nathan, 2008. "Niche products, generic products, and consumer search," MPRA Paper 32161, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2011.
  9. Larson, Nathan & Elmaghraby, Wedad, 2008. "Procurement auctions with avoidable fixed costs: an experimental approach," MPRA Paper 32163, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2011.

Articles

  1. Simon Anderson & Alicia Baik & Nathan Larson, 2023. "Price Discrimination in the Information Age: Prices, Poaching, and Privacy with Personalized Targeted Discounts," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 90(5), pages 2085-2115.
  2. Larson Nathan, 2016. "Strategic Delay in Global Games," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 83-117, January.
  3. Larson, Nathan, 2015. "Inertia in social learning from a summary statistic," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 159(PA), pages 596-626.
  4. Anderson, Simon & Baik, Alicia & Larson, Nathan, 2015. "Personalized pricing and advertising: An asymmetric equilibrium analysis," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 53-73.
  5. Nathan Larson, 2013. "Niche products, generic products, and consumer search," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 52(2), pages 793-832, March.
  6. Elmaghraby, Wedad J. & Larson, Nathan, 2012. "Explaining deviations from equilibrium in auctions with avoidable fixed costs," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 131-159.
  7. Angrisani Marco & Guarino Antonio & Huck Steffen & Larson Nathan C, 2011. "No-Trade in the Laboratory," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-58, April.
  8. Larson, Nathan, 2009. "Private value perturbations and informational advantage in common value auctions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 430-460, March.
  9. Larson, Nathan, 2004. "Match choice and Ghettoization in evolutionary games," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 1-28, July.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Anderson, Simon & Baik, Alicia & Larson, Nathan, 2019. "Price Discrimination in the Information Age: Prices, Poaching, and Privacy with Personalized Targeted Discounts," CEPR Discussion Papers 13793, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    Cited by:

    1. Didier Laussel & Ngo Van Long & Joana Resende, 2019. "The Curse of Knowledge: Having Access to Customer Information Can Reduce Monopoly Profit," CIRANO Working Papers 2019s-04, CIRANO.
    2. Flavio Pino, 2022. "The microeconomics of data – a survey," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 49(3), pages 635-665, September.
    3. Garella, Paolo G. & Laussel, Didier & Resende, Joana, 2021. "Behavior based price personalization under vertical product differentiation," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    4. Didier Laussel & Joana Resende, 2022. "When Is Product Personalization Profit-Enhancing? A Behavior-Based Discrimination Model," Post-Print hal-03740642, HAL.
    5. Didier Laussel & Ngo van Long & Joana Resende, 2023. "Profit Effects of Consumers’ Identity Management: A Dynamic Model," Post-Print hal-04019356, HAL.
    6. Matveenko, Andrei & Starkov, Egor, 2023. "Sparking curiosity or tipping the scales? Targeted advertising with consumer learning," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 172-192.
    7. Laussel, Didier & Long, Ngo Van & Resende, Joana, 2019. "The Curse of Knowledge: Having Access to Customer Information Can be Detrimental to Monopoly’s Profit," Discussion paper series HIAS-E-93, Hitotsubashi Institute for Advanced Study, Hitotsubashi University.
    8. Didier Laussel & Joana Resende, 2022. "When Is Product Personalization Profit-Enhancing? A Behavior-Based Discrimination Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(12), pages 8872-8888, December.
    9. Laussel, Didier & Long, Ngo Van & Resende, Joana, 2020. "Quality and price personalization under customer recognition: A dynamic monopoly model with contrasting equilibria," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    10. Yiquan Gu & Leonardo Madio & Carlo Reggiani, 2021. "Exclusive Data, Price Manipulation and Market Leadership," Working Papers 202102, University of Liverpool, Department of Economics.

  2. Anderson, Simon & Baik, Alicia & Larson, Nathan, 2015. "Personalized Pricing and Advertising: An Asymmetric Equilibrium Analysis," CEPR Discussion Papers 10464, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    Cited by:

    1. Astorne-Figari, Carmen & López, José Joaquín & Yankelevich, Aleksandr, 2019. "Advertising for consideration," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 653-669.
    2. Simon Anderson & Alicia Baik & Nathan Larson, 2023. "Price Discrimination in the Information Age: Prices, Poaching, and Privacy with Personalized Targeted Discounts," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 90(5), pages 2085-2115.
    3. Anderson, Simon P. & Jullien, Bruno, 2016. "The advertising-financed business model in two-sided media markets," TSE Working Papers 16-632, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    4. Didier Laussel & Ngo Van Long & Joana Resende, 2019. "The Curse of Knowledge: Having Access to Customer Information Can Reduce Monopoly Profit," CIRANO Working Papers 2019s-04, CIRANO.
    5. David P. Myatt, 2019. "A Theory of Stable Price Dispersion," Economics Series Working Papers 873, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    6. Garella, Paolo G. & Laussel, Didier & Resende, Joana, 2021. "Behavior based price personalization under vertical product differentiation," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    7. Montez, João & Marxen, Annabelle, 2020. "Licensing at the patent cliff and market entry," CEPR Discussion Papers 14276, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    8. Didier Laussel & Joana Resende, 2022. "When Is Product Personalization Profit-Enhancing? A Behavior-Based Discrimination Model," Post-Print hal-03740642, HAL.
    9. Margarita De-Miguel-Guzmán & Carlos Ronquillo-Bolaños & Alexander Sánchez-Rodríguez & Gelmar García-Vidal & Reyner Pérez-Campdesuñer & Rodobaldo Martínez-Vivar, 2020. "Analysis of the Effectiveness of Advertising Messages. Comparison by Media, Typology, and Schedule of Advertisements," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 32(1), pages 27-46.
    10. David Bounie & Antoine Dubus & Patrick Waelbroeck, 2021. "Selling strategic information in digital competitive markets," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 52(2), pages 283-313, June.
    11. Didier Laussel & Ngo van Long & Joana Resende, 2023. "Profit Effects of Consumers’ Identity Management: A Dynamic Model," Post-Print hal-04019356, HAL.
    12. Montez, João & Schutz, Nicolas, 2018. "All-Pay Oligopolies: Price Competition with Unobservable Inventory Choices," CEPR Discussion Papers 12963, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    13. Shelegia, Sandro & Wilson, Christopher, 2019. "A Generalized Model of Advertised Sales," CEPR Discussion Papers 14113, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    14. Schlosser, Rainer, 2017. "Stochastic dynamic pricing and advertising in isoelastic oligopoly models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(3), pages 1144-1155.
    15. Esteves, Rosa-Branca & Resende, Joana, 2019. "Personalized pricing and advertising: Who are the winners?," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 239-282.
    16. Sandro Shelegia & Chris M. Wilson, 2016. "A generalized model of sales," Economics Working Papers 1541, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    17. Laussel, Didier & Long, Ngo Van & Resende, Joana, 2019. "The Curse of Knowledge: Having Access to Customer Information Can be Detrimental to Monopoly’s Profit," Discussion paper series HIAS-E-93, Hitotsubashi Institute for Advanced Study, Hitotsubashi University.
    18. Didier Laussel & Joana Resende, 2022. "When Is Product Personalization Profit-Enhancing? A Behavior-Based Discrimination Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(12), pages 8872-8888, December.
    19. Laussel, Didier & Long, Ngo Van & Resende, Joana, 2020. "Quality and price personalization under customer recognition: A dynamic monopoly model with contrasting equilibria," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    20. Schlosser, Rainer, 2016. "Joint stochastic dynamic pricing and advertising with time-dependent demand," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 439-452.
    21. Siemering, Christian, 2023. "A model of endogenous targeting in duopoly," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    22. Arnold, Michael & Zhang, Lan, 2020. "Competition with an information clearinghouse and asymmetric firms: Why more than two firms compete (or not) for shoppers," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 55-82.
    23. Chen, Bintong & Chen, Jing, 2017. "When to introduce an online channel, and offer money back guarantees and personalized pricing?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(2), pages 614-624.

  3. Ralph Sonenshine & Nathan Larson & Michael Cauvel, 2015. "The Effect of Mergers, Divestitures, and Board Composition on CEO Compensation Before and After the Financial Crisis," Working Papers 2015-08, American University, Department of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Shashank Bansal & M. Thenmozhi, 2019. "Does Board Composition Matter to Institutional Investors?," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 18(2_suppl), pages 238-266, August.

  4. Larson, Nathan, 2011. "Network security," MPRA Paper 32822, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. Daron Acemoglu & Azarakhsh Malekian & Asuman Ozdaglar, 2013. "Network Security and Contagion," NBER Working Papers 19174, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

  5. Larson, Nathan, 2008. "Inertia in social learning from a summary statistic," MPRA Paper 32143, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Jul 2011.

    Cited by:

    1. Antonio Guarino & Philippe Jehiel, 2013. "Social Learning with Coarse Inference," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 5(1), pages 147-174, February.
    2. Monzón, Ignacio & Rapp, Michael, 2014. "Observational learning with position uncertainty," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 375-402.
    3. Vincent Mak & Rami Zwick, 2014. "Experimenting and learning with localized direct communication," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 17(2), pages 262-284, June.

  6. Marco Angrisani & Antonio Guarino & Steffen Huck & Nathan Larson, 2008. "No-Trade in the Laboratory," CESifo Working Paper Series 2436, CESifo.

    Cited by:

    1. Morone, Andrea & Nuzzo, Simone, 2016. "Do markets (institutions) drive out lemmings - or vice versa?," Kiel Working Papers 2061, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    2. Page, Lionel & Siemroth, Christoph, 2017. "An experimental analysis of information acquisition in prediction markets," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 354-378.
    3. Carrillo, Juan D. & Palfrey, Thomas R., 2011. "No trade," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 66-87, January.
    4. Aghion, Philippe & Fehr, Ernst & Holden, Richard & Wilkening, Tom, 2015. "The Role of Bounded Rationality and Imperfect Information in Subgame Perfect Implementation: An Empirical Investigation," IZA Discussion Papers 8971, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    5. Wenner, Lukas M., 2018. "Do sellers exploit biased beliefs of buyers? An experiment," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 194-215.
    6. Schmitz, Patrick W. & Hoppe-Fischer, Eva, 2013. "Do Sellers Offer Menus of Contracts to Separate Buyer Types? An Experimental Test of Adverse Selection Theory," CEPR Discussion Papers 9510, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    7. Andrea Morone & Simone Nuzzo, 2016. "Market efficiency, trading institutions and information mirages: Evidence from an experimental asset market," Working Papers 2016/12, Economics Department, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón (Spain).
    8. Kleinlercher, Daniel & Stöckl, Thomas, 2021. "Thou shalt not trade—An analysis of the violations of no-trade predictions in experimental asset markets," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C).
    9. Ruiz-Buforn, Alba & Camacho-Cuena, Eva & Morone, Andrea & Alfarano, Simone, 2021. "Overweighting of public information in financial markets: A lesson from the lab," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    10. Ruiz-Buforn, Alba & Alfarano, Simone & Camacho-Cuena, Eva & Morone, Andrea, 2018. "Crowding out effect and traders' overreliance on public information in financial markets: a lesson from the lab," MPRA Paper 88866, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Andrea Morone & Simone Nuzzo, 2019. "Market efficiency, trading institutions and information mirages: evidence from a laboratory asset market," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 14(2), pages 317-344, June.

  7. Larson, Nathan, 2008. "Niche products, generic products, and consumer search," MPRA Paper 32161, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2011.

    Cited by:

    1. Heski Bar-Isaac & Guillermo Caruana & Vicente Cuñat, 2023. "Targeted Product Design," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(2), pages 157-186, May.
    2. Tobias Gamp & Daniel Krähmer, 2022. "Competition in search markets with naive consumers," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 53(2), pages 356-385, June.
    3. Max Riegel, 2024. "Vertical Differentiation Through Product Design," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2024_556, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    4. Arthur Fishman & Nadav Levy, 2015. "Search Costs and Investment in Quality," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(4), pages 625-641, December.
    5. Heski Bar-Isaac & Guillermo Caruana & Vicente Cunat, 2012. "Search, Design, and Market Structure," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(2), pages 1140-1160, April.
    6. Riegel, Max, 2023. "Vertical Differentiation through Product Design," MPRA Paper 119384, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. S. Nuray Akin & Brennan Platt, 2012. "A theory of search with deadlines and uncertain recall," Working Papers 2012-3, University of Miami, Department of Economics.
    8. Gamp, Tobias & Krähmer, Daniel, 2022. "Competition in Search Markets with Naive Consumers," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 364, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    9. Asli Elif Aydin, 2014. "Consumer Information Search Behavior for Experiential and Material Purchases," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 6(3), pages 194-201.
    10. Hui Song, 2017. "Ordered search with asymmetric product design," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 121(2), pages 105-132, June.
    11. Mariana Cunha & António Osório & Ricardo Ribeiro, 2016. "Endogenous product design and quality with rationally inattentive consumers," Working Papers de Economia (Economics Working Papers) 03, Católica Porto Business School, Universidade Católica Portuguesa.
    12. Moraga-González, José-Luis & Sun, Yajie, 2022. "Product Quality and Consumer Search," CEPR Discussion Papers 14669, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

Articles

  1. Simon Anderson & Alicia Baik & Nathan Larson, 2023. "Price Discrimination in the Information Age: Prices, Poaching, and Privacy with Personalized Targeted Discounts," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 90(5), pages 2085-2115.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  2. Larson, Nathan, 2015. "Inertia in social learning from a summary statistic," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 159(PA), pages 596-626.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  3. Anderson, Simon & Baik, Alicia & Larson, Nathan, 2015. "Personalized pricing and advertising: An asymmetric equilibrium analysis," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 53-73.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  4. Nathan Larson, 2013. "Niche products, generic products, and consumer search," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 52(2), pages 793-832, March.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  5. Elmaghraby, Wedad J. & Larson, Nathan, 2012. "Explaining deviations from equilibrium in auctions with avoidable fixed costs," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 131-159.

    Cited by:

    1. Ke Liu & Xiaoxuan Meng, 2021. "Exclusive dealing when upstream displacement is possible," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 830-843, November.

  6. Angrisani Marco & Guarino Antonio & Huck Steffen & Larson Nathan C, 2011. "No-Trade in the Laboratory," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-58, April.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  7. Larson, Nathan, 2009. "Private value perturbations and informational advantage in common value auctions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 430-460, March.

    Cited by:

    1. Bajoori, Elnaz & Vermeulen, Dries, 2019. "Equilibrium selection in interdependent value auctions," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 47-56.
    2. Boone, J. & Goeree, J.K., 2005. "Optimal Privatization Using Qualifying Auctions," Discussion Paper 2005-72, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    3. Ángel Hernando Veciana & Michael Tröge, 2005. "The Insider'S Curse," Working Papers. Serie AD 2005-08, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    4. Jan Boone & Jacob K. Goeree, 2009. "Optimal Privatisation Using Qualifying Auctions," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 119(534), pages 277-297, January.
    5. Fasten, Erik R. & Hofmann, Dirk, 2010. "Two-sided Certification: The market for Rating Agencies," Discussion Paper Series of SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems 338, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich.
    6. Hernando-Veciana, Ángel, 2009. "Information acquisition in auctions: Sealed bids vs. open bids," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 372-405, March.
    7. Malueg, David A. & Orzach, Ram, 2009. "Revenue comparison in common-value auctions: Two examples," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 105(2), pages 177-180, November.
    8. Liu, Heng, 2014. "Equilibrium selection in common-value second-price auctions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 1-6.
    9. Morath, Florian, 2010. "Volunteering and the strategic value of ignorance," Discussion Papers, Research Professorship & Project "The Future of Fiscal Federalism" SP II 2010-17, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    10. David Malueg & Ram Orzach, 2012. "Equilibrium and revenue in a family of common-value first-price auctions with differential information," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 41(2), pages 219-254, May.
    11. Alejandro Francetich, 2013. "Becoming the Neighbor Bidder: Endogenous Winner’s Curse in Dynamic Mechanisms," Working Papers 501, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
    12. Alejandro Francetich, 2015. "Becoming the Neighbor Bidder: Endogenous Winner's Curse in Dynamic Mechanisms," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 7(2), pages 45-76, May.
    13. Erik R. Fasten & Dirk Hofmann, 2010. "Two-sided Certification: The market for Rating Agencies," SFB 649 Discussion Papers SFB649DP2010-007, Sonderforschungsbereich 649, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
    14. Fasten, Erik R. & Hofmann, Dirk, 2010. "Two-sided certification: The market for rating agencies," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2010-007, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    15. Fong, Yuk-fai & Garrett, Daniel F., 2010. "Bidding in a possibly common-value auction," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 494-501, November.
    16. Abraham, Ittai & Athey, Susan & Babaioff, Moshe & Grubb, Michael D., 2020. "Peaches, lemons, and cookies: Designing auction markets with dispersed information," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 454-477.
    17. Daniel Quint, 2010. "Looking smart versus playing dumb in common-value auctions," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 44(3), pages 469-490, September.

  8. Larson, Nathan, 2004. "Match choice and Ghettoization in evolutionary games," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 1-28, July.

    Cited by:

    1. Thierry Vignolo, 2010. "Imitation and selective matching in reputational games," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 395-412, June.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 5 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-BEC: Business Economics (2) 2015-03-05 2015-08-07
  2. NEP-CFN: Corporate Finance (2) 2011-08-22 2015-08-07
  3. NEP-COM: Industrial Competition (2) 2015-03-05 2019-09-02
  4. NEP-IND: Industrial Organization (2) 2015-03-05 2019-09-02
  5. NEP-MIC: Microeconomics (2) 2015-03-05 2019-09-02
  6. NEP-CTA: Contract Theory and Applications (1) 2015-03-05
  7. NEP-HRM: Human Capital and Human Resource Management (1) 2015-08-07
  8. NEP-MFD: Microfinance (1) 2015-03-05
  9. NEP-MKT: Marketing (1) 2015-03-05
  10. NEP-MST: Market Microstructure (1) 2011-08-22
  11. NEP-NET: Network Economics (1) 2011-08-22
  12. NEP-SOC: Social Norms and Social Capital (1) 2011-08-22

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Nathan Larson should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.