IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/e/pdo96.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Peter C. Dooley

(deceased)

Personal Details

This person is deceased (Date: 19 Jun 2012)
First Name:Peter
Middle Name:C.
Last Name:Dooley
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pdo96
http://usaskfaculty.ca/2012/06/28/usfa-e-letter-the-legacy-of-peter-c-dooley/

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Dooley, P.C., 1992. "Petty's Theories of Rent," Papers 92-3, Saskatchewan - Department of Economics.
  2. Dooley, P.C., 1992. "John Locke and Classical Perspective on Value and Rent," Papers 92-6, Saskatchewan - Department of Economics.

Articles

  1. Peter C. Dooley, 1992. "Why Did Marshall Introduce the Giffen Paradox?," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 24(3), pages 749-752, Fall.
  2. Dooley, Peter C, 1988. "Porter's Hint and Alternative Theories of the Giffen Paradox: A Reply," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(50), pages 142-144, June.
  3. Peter C. Dooley, 1988. "Malthus on Long Swings: The General Case," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 21(1), pages 200-205, February.
  4. Dooley, Peter C, 1985. "Alfred Marshall: Fitting the Theory to the Facts," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 9(3), pages 245-255, September.
  5. Dooley, Peter C, 1985. "Giffen's Hint?," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(44), pages 201-205, June.
  6. Peter C. Dooley, 1983. "Consumer's Surplus: Marshall and His Critics," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 16(1), pages 26-38, February.
  7. Peter C. Dooley, 1983. "Slutsky's Equation is Pareto's Solution," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 15(4), pages 513-517, Winter.
  8. Dooley, Peter C, 1969. "The Interlocking Directorate," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 59(3), pages 314-323, June.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

    Sorry, no citations of working papers recorded.

Articles

  1. Peter C. Dooley, 1983. "Consumer's Surplus: Marshall and His Critics," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 16(1), pages 26-38, February.

    Cited by:

    1. Graham,Errol George & Tchale,Hardwick & Ndione,Mamadou, 2020. "An Optimal Rice Policy for Sierra Leone : Balancing Consumer and Producer Welfare," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9369, The World Bank.
    2. Robert Sproule & Ambrose Leung, 2007. "Using the compensating and equivalent variations to define the Slutsky Equation under a discrete price change," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 4(11), pages 1-9.
    3. Michael V. White, 1990. "Invention in the Face of Necessity: Marshallian Rhetoric and the Giffen Good(s)," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 66(1), pages 1-11, March.
    4. Rozenn Martinoia, 2000. "Le surplus des consommateurs d'Alfred Marshall : une généalogie intellectuelle," Cahiers d'Économie Politique, Programme National Persée, vol. 36(1), pages 39-58.
    5. Ronald Ravinesh Kumar & Peter J. Stauvermann, 2021. "Revisited: Monopoly and Long-Run Capital Accumulation in Two-Sector Overlapping Generation Model," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Miroslav Svoboda, 2008. "History and troubles of consumer surplus," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2008(3), pages 230-242.

  2. Peter C. Dooley, 1983. "Slutsky's Equation is Pareto's Solution," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 15(4), pages 513-517, Winter.

    Cited by:

    1. Johannes Bröcker & Till Requate, 2022. "Substitution and size effect for factor demand revisited," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 10(2), pages 251-265, October.
    2. Jean-Sébastien Lenfant, 2006. "Complementarity and Demand Theory: From the 1920s to the 1940s," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 38(5), pages 48-85, Supplemen.
    3. Robert Nau, 2011. "Risk, ambiguity, and state-preference theory," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 48(2), pages 437-467, October.
    4. Alan Martina, 2000. "Antonelli's analytical techniques: their exploitation to derive results in duality theory," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(3), pages 363-376.
    5. Kazuyuki Sasakura, 2016. "Slutsky Revisited: A New Decomposition of the Price Effect," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 2(2), pages 253-280, July.
    6. Robert Sproule & Ambrose Leung, 2007. "Using the compensating and equivalent variations to define the Slutsky Equation under a discrete price change," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 4(11), pages 1-9.
    7. Christian Weber, 2002. "Did Pareto discover income and substitution effects? On an interpretation suggested by Hutchison," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 2(2), pages 1-6.
    8. Aldo Montesano, 2024. "Pareto and pure economics: analyses subsequently accepted and others neglected," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 71(3), pages 537-552, September.

  3. Dooley, Peter C, 1969. "The Interlocking Directorate," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 59(3), pages 314-323, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Mehmet Ali Köseoglu & John A. Parnell & Melissa Yan Yee Yick, 2021. "Identifying influential studies and maturity level in intellectual structure of fields: evidence from strategic management," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1271-1309, February.
    2. Ingolf Dittmann & Ernst Maug & Christoph Schneider, 2008. "How Preussag Became TUI: A Clinical Study of Institutional Blockholders and Restructuring in Europe," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 37(3), pages 571-598, September.
    3. Bouwman, Christa H. S., 2010. "Corporate Governance Propagation through Overlapping Directors," Working Papers 11-23, University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School, Weiss Center.
    4. Leonardo BECCHETTI & Fabio PISANI, 2015. "The Determinants of Outreach Performance of Social Business: an Inquiry on Italian Social Cooperatives," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 86(1), pages 105-136, March.
    5. Santella, Paolo & Drago, Carlo & Polo, Andrea & Gagliardi, Enrico, 2009. "A Comparison among the director networks in the main listed companies in France, Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom," MPRA Paper 16397, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Benjamin S. Kay & Cindy M. Vojtech, 2015. "Corporate Governance Responses to Director Rule Changes," Staff Discussion Papers 15-02, Office of Financial Research, US Department of the Treasury.
    7. Ettore Croci & Rosanna Grassi, 2014. "The economic effect of interlocking directorates in Italy: new evidence using centrality measures," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 89-112, March.
    8. Gualdani, Cristina, 2018. "An Econometric Model of Network Formation with an Application to Board Interlocks between Firms," TSE Working Papers 17-898, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised Jul 2019.
    9. Jean-Pierre Pichard-Stamford, 2000. "Légitimité et enracinement du dirigeant par le réseau des administrateurs," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 3(4), pages 143-178, December.
    10. Jason Coupet & Abagail McWilliams, 2017. "Integrating Organizational Economics and Resource Dependence Theory to Explain the Persistence of Quasi Markets," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-13, August.
    11. Gualdani, Cristina, 2021. "An econometric model of network formation with an application to board interlocks between firms," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 224(2), pages 345-370.
    12. Alain Alcouffe & Hee-Young Yeo & Christine Pochet, 2003. "Ceo Reciprocal Interlocks in French Corporations," Post-Print halshs-00006093, HAL.
    13. Barone, Guglielmo & Schivardi, Fabiano & Sette, Enrico, 2022. "Interlocking Directorates and Competition in Banking," CEPR Discussion Papers 14654, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    14. Drago, Carlo & Millo, Francesco & Ricciuti, Roberto & Santella, Paolo, 2015. "Corporate governance reforms, interlocking directorship and company performance in Italy," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 38-49.
    15. Carbonai Davide & Di Bartolomeo Giovanni, 2006. "Interlocking directorates as a trust substitute: The case of the Italian non-life insurance industry," wp.comunite 0001, Department of Communication, University of Teramo.
    16. Carlos Drago & Francesco Millo & Roberto Ricciuti & Paolo Santella, 2011. "Corporate Governance Reforms, Interlocking Directorship Networks and Company Value in Italy (1998-2007)," CESifo Working Paper Series 3322, CESifo.
    17. Caswell, Julie A., 1988. "An Alternative Measure Of Aggregate Concentration With An Application To The Agribusiness Sector," Working Papers 115904, Regional Research Project NE-165 Private Strategies, Public Policies, and Food System Performance.
    18. Michele Bernini & Georgios Efthyvoulou & Ian Gregory-Smith & Jolian McHardy & Antonio Navas, 2014. "Interlocking Directorships and Patenting Coordination," Working Papers 2014016, The University of Sheffield, Department of Economics.
    19. Larcker, David F. & So, Eric C. & Wang, Charles C.Y., 2013. "Boardroom centrality and firm performance," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 225-250.
    20. Wuyts, Stefan & Dutta, Shantanu, 2008. "Licensing exchange—Insights from the biopharmaceutical industry," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 273-281.
    21. Bikram De, 2008. "The Incidence and Performance Effects of Interlocking Directorates in Emerging Market Business Groups: Evidence from India," Working Papers id:1770, eSocialSciences.
    22. Wuyts, S.H.K. & Dutta, S., 2008. "Licensing exchange : Insights from the biopharmaceutical industry," Other publications TiSEM 79c0c1a5-b48c-4de2-aa6f-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    23. Larcker, David F. & So, Eric C. & Wang, Charles C. Y., 2010. "Boardroom Centrality and Stock Returns," Research Papers 2061, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    24. Drago, Carlo & Ricciuti, Roberto & Santella, Paolo, 2016. "An Attempt to Disperse the Italian Interlocking Directorship Network: Analyzing the Effects of the 2011 Reform," Economy and Society 230584, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    25. Mariëlle C. Non & Philip Hans Franses, 2007. "Interlocking Boards and Firm Performance: Evidence from a New Panel Database," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 07-034/2, Tinbergen Institute.
    26. Evandro de Nez & Paulo Roberto da Cunha, 2018. "Influence of board interlocking in the selection of the audit firm on the mandatory caster," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 63(2), pages 5-6, Junio.
    27. Bryan S. Graham, 2019. "Network Data," Papers 1912.06346, arXiv.org.
    28. Geoffrey Martin & Remzi Gözübüyük & Manuel Becerra, 2015. "Interlocks and firm performance: The role of uncertainty in the directorate interlock-performance relationship," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 235-253, February.
    29. Isabel-María García-Sánchez, 2010. "The effectiveness of corporate governance: board structure and business technical efficiency in Spain," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 18(3), pages 311-339, September.
    30. Sicilia, Carlos & Sallan, Jose M. & Simo, Pep, 2016. "The Spanish corporate structure through interlocking directorates," Cuadernos de Gestión, Universidad del País Vasco - Instituto de Economía Aplicada a la Empresa (IEAE).
    31. Giovanni Bartolomeo & Paolo Canofari, 2015. "Interlocking Directorates and Concentration in the Italian Insurance Market," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 351-362, December.
    32. Pombo, Carlos & Gutiérrez, Luis H., 2011. "Outside directors, board interlocks and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Colombian business groups," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 63(4), pages 251-277, July.
    33. Stefanelli, Valeria & Matteo, Cotugno, 2010. "An Empirical Analysis on Board Monitoring Role and Loan Portfolio Quality Measurement in Banks," MPRA Paper 29766, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    34. Bikram De, 2003. "The Incidence And Performance Effects Of Interlocking Directorates In Emerging Market Business Groups : Evidence From India," Microeconomics Working Papers 22390, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    35. Roszaini Haniffa & Mohammad Hudaib, 2006. "Corporate Governance Structure and Performance of Malaysian Listed Companies," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(7‐8), pages 1034-1062, September.
    36. Carbonai, Davide & Drago, Carlo, 2015. "Positive Freedom in Networked Capitalism: An Empirical Analysis," Economy and Society 208364, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    37. Eliezer M. Fitch & Lawrence J. White, 2001. "Why Do CEO's Reciprocally Sit On Each Other's Boards?," Working Papers 01-03, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, Department of Economics.
    38. Bing Ren & Kevin Au & Thomas Birtch, 2009. "China’s business network structure during institutional transitions," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 219-240, June.
    39. Fortich, Roberto & Gutiérrez, Luis & Pombo, Carlos, 2008. "Board structure and firm performance: evidence from Colombia," Galeras. Working Papers Series 019, Universidad de Los Andes. Facultad de Administración. School of Management.
    40. Serguei Saavedra & Luis J. Gilarranz & Rudolf P. Rohr & Michael Schnabel & Brian Uzzi & Jordi Bascompte, 2014. "Stock fluctuations are correlated and amplified across networks of interlocking directorates," Papers 1410.6646, arXiv.org.
    41. Jonathan A. Christy & Zoltan P. Matolcsy & Anna Wright & Anne Wyatt, 2013. "Do Board Characteristics Influence the Shareholders' Assessment of Risk for Small and Large Firms?," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 49(2), pages 161-196, June.
    42. Matthew R. Roy & Mark A. Fox & Robert T. Hamilton, 1994. "Board Size and Potential Corporate and Director Interlocks in Australasia 1984-1993," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 19(2), pages 201-217, December.
    43. Dayanandan, Ajit & Donker, Han & Nofsinger, John, 2019. "The role of caste for board membership, CEO, and interlocking," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 29-41.
    44. Toby Stuart & Soojin Yim, 2008. "Board Interlocks and the Propensity to be Targeted in Private Equity Transactions," NBER Working Papers 14189, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    45. Umed Temurshoev, 2008. "Who's Who in Networks. Wanted: the Key Group," Working Papers 08-08, NET Institute, revised Sep 2008.
    46. R. Andergassen, 2011. "Board of director collusion, managerial incentives and firm values," Working Papers wp795, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    47. Ludovico Alcorta, 1986. "Perspectivas de la centralización económica: un balance bibliográfico," Apuntes. Revista de ciencias sociales, Fondo Editorial, Universidad del Pacífico, vol. 13(19), pages 3-51.
    48. Khondkar E. Karim & Jiayan Li & Karen Jingrong Lin & Ashok Robin, 2022. "Do directors have style? Board interlock and accounting properties," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1-2), pages 3-32, January.
    49. Bryan S. Graham, 2019. "Network Data," CeMMAP working papers CWP71/19, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    50. Hansin Bilgili & Jonathan L. Johnson & Tsvetomira V. Bilgili & Alan E. Ellstrand, 2022. "Research on social relationships and processes governing the behaviors of members of the corporate elite: a review and bibliometric analysis," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(8), pages 2285-2339, November.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Peter C. Dooley should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.