IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jforec/v44y2025i6p1884-1906.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fundamentals Models Versus Random Walk: Evidence From an Emerging Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Helder Ferreira de Mendonça
  • Luciano Vereda
  • Luan Mateus Matos de Araújo

Abstract

We analyze the predictive power of fundamentals versus random walk models for horizons from 1 to 24 months in an emerging market. Specifically, we investigate what fundamentals models outperform random walk during periods of appreciation and depreciation of the exchange rate. Furthermore, we analyze whether the fundamentals models that beat random walk contain information not considered by market expectations. Based on data from the Brazilian economy, the findings point out that some fundamentals models are useful for forecasting the exchange rate. The predictive power of fundamentals models increases in periods marked by a trend of currency appreciation or depreciation. In particular, the PPP‐type fundamentals models have greater predictive power than the random walk and add information to market expectations for different time horizons and periods of exchange rate appreciation and depreciation.

Suggested Citation

  • Helder Ferreira de Mendonça & Luciano Vereda & Luan Mateus Matos de Araújo, 2025. "Fundamentals Models Versus Random Walk: Evidence From an Emerging Economy," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(6), pages 1884-1906, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jforec:v:44:y:2025:i:6:p:1884-1906
    DOI: 10.1002/for.3279
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/for.3279
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/for.3279?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jforec:v:44:y:2025:i:6:p:1884-1906. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/2966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.