IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jsecdv/v27y2025i1d10.1007_s40847-024-00338-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Race, gender and beauty in instructional ratings: a quantile regression approach

Author

Listed:
  • Sudhakar Raju

    (Rockhurst University)

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to apply quantile regression (QR) to analyze the effect of ascriptive characteristics such as beauty, gender and race on teaching evaluations. QR offers significant methodological advantages for studying issues that involve unequal outcomes at various points of a skewed distribution. While QR has been applied to other forms of discrimination (age, caste, obesity, etc.), it has not been specifically applied to discrimination in teaching evaluations. Using an unusual dataset originally compiled by Hamermesh and Parker (H–P 2005) on beauty, I re-analyze the dataset using QR. While the original paper by H–P focused only on the effect of beauty on teaching evaluations, I find evidence of other biases. The striking result here is not the impact of beauty on evaluations. Beauty, by itself, does not exert much of an effect. Gender, however, has a more pronounced effect and when combined with race tends to result in significant negative effects at various points of the quantile distribution. When contrasting these findings of bias with more recent ones, not much seems to have changed over the last two decades.

Suggested Citation

  • Sudhakar Raju, 2025. "Race, gender and beauty in instructional ratings: a quantile regression approach," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 27(1), pages 1-19, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jsecdv:v:27:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s40847-024-00338-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s40847-024-00338-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40847-024-00338-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40847-024-00338-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Teaching evaluations; Instructional evaluations; Discrimination; Bias; Beauty; Race; Gender; Quantile regression; Hamermesh and Parker (2005);
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • I29 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Other
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • J71 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Discrimination - - - Hiring and Firing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jsecdv:v:27:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s40847-024-00338-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.