IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ilrrev/v74y2021i4p920-947.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Do Online Degrees Affect Labor Market Prospects? Evidence from a Correspondence Audit Study

Author

Listed:
  • Conor Lennon

Abstract

This article reports the findings of a correspondence audit study that examines how online bachelor’s degrees affect labor market outcomes. The study involves sending 1,891 applications for real job openings using 100 fictitious applicant profiles. The applicant profiles are designed to be representative of recent college graduates from established universities. Using random assignment to degree type, applicant profiles that indicate a traditional (in-person) degree receive nearly twice as many callbacks as those that indicate an online degree. Findings suggest that, at least currently, completing an online degree program would significantly limit the labor market prospects of typical college students.

Suggested Citation

  • Conor Lennon, 2021. "How Do Online Degrees Affect Labor Market Prospects? Evidence from a Correspondence Audit Study," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 74(4), pages 920-947, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:74:y:2021:i:4:p:920-947
    DOI: 10.1177/0019793919899943
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0019793919899943
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0019793919899943?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stans, Renske & Ehrmantraut, Laura & Siemers, Malin & Pinger, Pia, 2025. "The Impact of Higher Education on Employer Perceptions," IZA Discussion Papers 17732, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Gaddis, S. Michael & Quadlin, Natasha & Larsen, Edvard Nergård & Crabtree, Charles & Holbein, John B., 2025. "Missing Results of Discrimination: A Systematically Comparative Meta-Analysis and Re-Examinations of Racial, Gender, and Intersectional Discrimination using Correspondence Audits," SocArXiv nd2y6_v1, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:74:y:2021:i:4:p:920-947. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ilr.cornell.edu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.