IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v70y2024i2p1276-1300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Value of U.S. College Education in Global Labor Markets: Experimental Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Mingyu Chen

    (IZA Institute of Labor Economics, 53113 Bonn, Germany)

Abstract

One million international students study in the United States each year, and the majority of them compete in global labor markets after graduation. I conducted a large-scale field experiment and a companion employer survey to study how employers in China value U.S. college education. I sent more than 27,000 fictitious online applications to business and computer science jobs in China, randomizing the country of college education. I find that U.S.-educated applicants are on average 18% less likely to receive a callback than applicants educated in China, with applicants from very selective U.S. institutions underperforming those from the least selective Chinese institutions. The United States-China callback gap is smaller at high-wage jobs, consistent with employers fearing U.S.-educated applicants have better outside options and would be harder to hire and retain. The gap is also smaller at foreign-owned firms, consistent with Chinese-owned firms knowing less about American education. Controlling for high school quality, test scores, or U.S. work experiences does not attenuate the gap, suggesting that the gap is not driven by employer perceptions of negative selection. A survey of 507 hiring managers at college career fairs finds consistent and additional supporting evidence for the experimental findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Mingyu Chen, 2024. "The Value of U.S. College Education in Global Labor Markets: Experimental Evidence from China," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(2), pages 1276-1300, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:70:y:2024:i:2:p:1276-1300
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2023.4745
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4745
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4745?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:70:y:2024:i:2:p:1276-1300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.