IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hrv/faseco/30367409.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Value of Postsecondary Credentials in the Labor Market: An Experimental Study

Author

Listed:
  • Deming, David James
  • Yuchtman, Noam
  • Abulafi, Amira
  • Goldin, Claudia D.
  • Katz, Lawrence F.

Abstract

We study employers’ perceptions of the value of postsecondary degrees using a field experiment. We randomly assign the sector and selectivity of institutions to fictitious resumes and apply to real vacancy postings for business and health jobs on a large online job board. We find that a business bachelor’s degree from a for-profit “online†institution is 22 percent less likely to receive a callback than one from a non-selective public institution. In applications to health jobs, we find that for-profit credentials receive fewer callbacks unless the job requires an external quality indicator such as an occupational license.

Suggested Citation

  • Deming, David James & Yuchtman, Noam & Abulafi, Amira & Goldin, Claudia D. & Katz, Lawrence F., 2016. "The Value of Postsecondary Credentials in the Labor Market: An Experimental Study," Scholarly Articles 30367409, Harvard University Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:hrv:faseco:30367409
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/30367409/30665162.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hrv:faseco:30367409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Office for Scholarly Communication (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deharus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.