IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Targeting Teaching: Does the Medium Matter? Online versus Paper Coursework

  • Rey Hernández-Julián


    (Metropolitan State College of Denver, Department of Economics, Campus Box 77, P.O. Box 173362, Denver, CO 80217-3362, USA)

  • Christina Peters


    (Metropolitan State College of Denver, Department of Economics, Campus Box 77, P.O. Box 173362, Denver, CO 80217-3362, USA; corresponding author)

Registered author(s):

    If individuals process information differently when it is accessed electronically rather than on paper, then the transition from paper to electronic text may affect learning and retention. Using a randomized experiment, we compare learning outcomes of economics students who use electronic teaching tools with students who access the same material on paper. We find that students who submit homework online complete more assignments but have lower classroom attendance rates. However, there is no effect on exam scores. This suggests that while an electronic medium may enable instructional material to be accessed more easily, it does not significantly impact learning.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Southern Economic Association in its journal Southern Economic Journal.

    Volume (Year): 78 (2012)
    Issue (Month): 4 (April)
    Pages: 1333-1345

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:sej:ancoec:v:78:4:y:2012:p:1333-1345
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sej:ancoec:v:78:4:y:2012:p:1333-1345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Laura Razzolini)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.