IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v46y2019i3p445-468.html

A quasi-equilibrium approach for market clearing in land use microsimulations

Author

Listed:
  • Ricardo Hurtubia
  • Francisco Javier Martinez
  • Michel Bierlaire

Abstract

A method for market clearing in land use models with a microsimulation approach for location choice of agents is proposed. The method, based on the Bid-auction theory and random utility models, assumes that agents individually adjust their perceived expected utility by observing market prices before entering auctions for a real estate good, hence modifying their overall willingness to pay for locations. The adjustment translates into a correction of each agent’s bid level that follows the direction of supply-demand equilibrium, as they attempt to ensure their location. In each period, auctions for each available real estate good are simulated and prices are computed as the expected maximum bid of all agents in the market. The proposed method is tested for the city of Brussels, validated against real data and compared with results obtained when the bid adjustment is not included. Simulation results reproduce price trends that were observed in reality between the year 2001 and 2008, outperforming results obtained without a quasi-equilibrium bid adjustment approach. The proposed method is feasible to be implemented in large scale microsimulations and agent-based models because it does not require solving large fixed-point equilibrium problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Ricardo Hurtubia & Francisco Javier Martinez & Michel Bierlaire, 2019. "A quasi-equilibrium approach for market clearing in land use microsimulations," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(3), pages 445-468, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:46:y:2019:i:3:p:445-468
    DOI: 10.1177/2399808317719071
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2399808317719071
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2399808317719071?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Yong & Irwin, Elena G. & Jayaprakash, Ciriyam, 2011. "Incorporating Spatial Complexity into Economic Models of Land Markets and Land Use Change," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(3), pages 321-340, December.
    2. Alex Anas & Yu Liu, 2007. "A Regional Economy, Land Use, And Transportation Model (Relu‐Tran©): Formulation, Algorithm Design, And Testing," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 415-455, August.
    3. Tatiana Filatova & Dawn C. Parker & Anne van der Veen, 2009. "Agent-Based Urban Land Markets: Agent's Pricing Behavior, Land Prices and Urban Land Use Change," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 12(1), pages 1-3.
    4. Shipeng Sun & Dawn C. Parker & Qingxu Huang & Tatiana Filatova & Derek T. Robinson & Rick L. Riolo & Meghan Hutchins & Daniel G. Brown, 2014. "Market Impacts on Land-Use Change: An Agent-Based Experiment," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 104(3), pages 460-484, May.
    5. Ellickson, Bryan, 1981. "An alternative test of the hedonic theory of housing markets," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 56-79, January.
    6. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521766555, Enero-Abr.
    7. Grimm, Volker & Berger, Uta & DeAngelis, Donald L. & Polhill, J. Gary & Giske, Jarl & Railsback, Steven F., 2010. "The ODD protocol: A review and first update," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(23), pages 2760-2768.
    8. Francisco Martínez & Ricardo Hurtubia, 2006. "Dynamic Model for the Simulation of Equilibrium Status in the Land Use Market," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 55-73, March.
    9. Chen, Yong & Irwin, Elena G. & Jayaprakash, Ciriyam, 2011. "Incorporating Spatial Complexity into Economic Models of Land Markets and Land Use Change," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 40(3), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Ricardo Hurtubia & Michel Bierlaire, 2014. "Estimation of Bid Functions for Location Choice and Price Modeling with a Latent Variable Approach," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 47-65, March.
    11. Farooq, Bilal & Bierlaire, Michel & Hurtubia, Ricardo & Flötteröd, Gunnar, 2013. "Simulation based population synthesis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 243-263.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huai, Yue & Lo, Hong K. & Zhang, Anming, 2025. "Optimal private housing supply under various schemes of public housing provision," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Magliocca, Nicholas & McConnell, Virginia & Walls, Margaret & Safirova, Elena, 2012. "Zoning on the urban fringe: Results from a new approach to modeling land and housing markets," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1-2), pages 198-210.
    2. Rianne Duinen & Tatiana Filatova & Wander Jager & Anne Veen, 2016. "Going beyond perfect rationality: drought risk, economic choices and the influence of social networks," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 57(2), pages 335-369, November.
    3. Rémi Lemoy & Charles Raux & Pablo Jensen, 2016. "Exploring the polycentric city with multi-worker households: an agent-based microeconomic model," Post-Print hal-00602087, HAL.
    4. Khalid Haniza, 2015. "Spatial heterogeneity and spatial bias analyses in hedonic price models: some practical considerations," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 28(28), pages 113-128, June.
    5. Lynch, Lori & Geoghegan, Jacqueline, 2011. "FOREWORD: The Economics of Land Use Change: Advancing the Frontiers," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 40(3), pages 1-6, December.
    6. Thomas E. Guerrero & C. Angelo Guevara & Elisabetta Cherchi & Juan de Dios Ortúzar, 2021. "Addressing endogeneity in strategic urban mode choice models," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 2081-2102, August.
    7. Francis Tseng & Fei Liu & Bernardo Alves Furtado, 2017. "Humans of Simulated New York (HOSNY): an exploratory comprehensive model of city life," Papers 1703.05240, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2017.
    8. Zhi Dong & Tien Sing, 2014. "Developer Heterogeneity and Competitive Land Bidding," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 441-466, April.
    9. Kii, Masanobu & Nakanishi, Hitomi & Nakamura, Kazuki & Doi, Kenji, 2016. "Transportation and spatial development: An overview and a future direction," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 148-158.
    10. Pangallo, Marco & Nadal, Jean-Pierre & Vignes, Annick, 2019. "Residential income segregation: A behavioral model of the housing market," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 15-35.
    11. Hirte, Georg & Nitzsche, Eric & Tscharaktschiew, Stefan, 2018. "Optimal adaptation in cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 147-169.
    12. Teulings, Coen & Ossokina, Ioulia V. & de Groot, Henri L.F., 2014. "Welfare Benefits of Agglomeration and Worker Heterogeneity," IZA Discussion Papers 8382, IZA Network @ LISER.
    13. Melvin Wong & Bilal Farooq, 2019. "Information processing constraints in travel behaviour modelling: A generative learning approach," Papers 1907.07036, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2019.
    14. De Groot, Henri L.F. & Ossokina, Ioulia V. & Teulings, Coen N, 2014. "Welfare Benefits of Agglomeration and Worker Heterogeneity," CEPR Discussion Papers 10216, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    15. Chen, Yong, 2020. "Effects of development tax on leapfrog sprawl in a thinly traded land market," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    16. Tomás Cox & Ricardo Hurtubia, 2021. "Latent Segmentation of Urban Space through Residential Location Choice," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 199-228, March.
    17. Jason Hawkins & Adam Weiss & Khandker Nurul Habib, 2021. "Household-level dynamics in residential location choice modelling with a latent auction method," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(2), pages 314-330, February.
    18. Cox, Tomás & Rossetti, Tomás & Hurtubia, Ricardo, 2019. "Validating street-level perceptual attributes with location choice models," OSF Preprints f48xs, Center for Open Science.
    19. Huai, Yue & Lo, Hong K. & Ng, Ka Fai, 2021. "Monocentric versus polycentric urban structure: Case study in Hong Kong," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 99-118.
    20. Martínez, Francisco J. & Henríquez, Rodrigo, 2007. "A random bidding and supply land use equilibrium model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 632-651, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:46:y:2019:i:3:p:445-468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.